Hokey dokey. Let’s talk for a minute about this whole “control” thing.
We social media nerds are fond of talking about not “controlling” the message. And companies are freaking out about the idea of “losing control” of their brands and their stuff because the rolling tide that is the social media whateveritis is going to come and take that away from them somehow.
My friend and trusted colleague, Olivier Blanchard, spoke to this sassily, but correctly this week:
Will customers suddenly crash your strategy meetings via Seesmic? Will their Facebook updates derail your media buying? Will they somehow use Twitter to intercept and rewrite your press releases? Will they hack Seesmic to replace your next ad campaigns with their own? Will they use MySpace to brainwash your empoyees into acting like jerks?
There are a few different things we need to talk about in context of the idea of control.
1. How You Present Yourself
You’ve always held the keys to how you put your business out into the world, or how you educate your employees about your purpose and values. Everything from your logo to your collateral to how your customer service department behaves is under the umbrella of your presentation as a company. You get to decide how you do this part. You make the rules about what you put out there in terms of sanctioned image, content, or message. That’s always been true, and that hasn’t changed. You have every bit the control over the presentation of your company as you always have.
2. How You Are Perceived and How People React
This is the bit where we’re talking about businesses never really having control. You can’t dictate how people think, period. You couldn’t do it before the world of social technologies, and you can’t do it now. You can present yourself and hope to influence that perception, but you cannot control it.
The difference is that today, with the prevalence and ubiquity of the internet, there are lots of places for people to share those perceptions with their friends and the world at large (including your customers, prospects, employees, and people not connected to you at all). So you haven’t lost any control. People are still reacting to your business the way they always have. Now, they’ve got more tools with which to share those viewpoints, and they’re more visible and sharable.
Worried that the danger is in your own house? That employees are going to misrepresent you if you give them tools to do so? Hint: they already have them. They’re called the phone on their desk, and the email account with your domain on it, and their own voice and personal lives. You trust them as representatives of your business in every other communication channel. If you don’t trust them here, you have a hiring problem or an education problem, but not a control problem. The tools are not the issue.
3. What You Do With What You Learn
Ultimately, you decide how you’re going to absorb and assimilate #2 into #1. As a business, if you’re listening and paying attention to how people are articulating those perceptions, you still have the choice as to what you’re going to do with that information. You can change everything. You can change nothing at all.
The reason social media advocates get up in your grill is because they’re afraid that #2 is happening, but that it’s not informing #1, and that the two may even be working at cross purposes. They (we) also believe that there’s probably some insights that your customers and community can give to you that might actually help make your business better, whether it’s reinforcement of what you’re doing well, criticism intended to point out potential weaknesses, or a way of looking at your business or describing your value in a way you may never have thought of.
The truth is that, with the rare trollish exception, people aren’t expressing their opinions about your company because they don’t care. They’re not trying to wrest your brand from you and create some brand alter-ego doppleganger thing, and they’re not using YouTube or Facebook or their blog to try and overthrow you as the masters of your brand domain. In fact, most people don’t want that kind of responsibility.
They’re trying to tell you what matters to them and what would make your business more useful and helpful to them (read: what makes them spend money on you), in whatever medium they think you’ll notice. They’re not trying to control your brand. They’re trying to get your attention.
You have all the control you want over #3. Using social media strategies and tools can help you with #2, if you’re engaging with the intent to hear and the intent to consider what those folks are telling you. That builds trust. It lets people know you’re paying attention and that you value their voice. It’s not a promise of action, but it’s a demonstration of awareness.
But control? You have as much as you always did. Now, you’ve got more accountability and expectations surrounding your business because of social media. People are watching to see how you respond to both. Ultimately, what you do with any of it is completely up to you.
See the difference? What do you think?
Hi.
I think it’s great that we (as online merchants) get to interact with our customers / potential customers in such a direct and open manner. Business transparency is bandied about a lot but it really is the only way to do it properly.
And online, there’s nowhere to hide.
So rejoice in the opportunity and if you’ve messed up, then by showing publicly how you deal with that – ultimately gives you more opportunities to do business because you’ll have not only shown you care enough about the one customer as a single entity to deal with their problem, you’ve also shown you’re human.
And that’s all some people want at the end of the day. To know that there’s someone there.
Jonathan
Hi.
I think it’s great that we (as online merchants) get to interact with our customers / potential customers in such a direct and open manner. Business transparency is bandied about a lot but it really is the only way to do it properly.
And online, there’s nowhere to hide.
So rejoice in the opportunity and if you’ve messed up, then by showing publicly how you deal with that – ultimately gives you more opportunities to do business because you’ll have not only shown you care enough about the one customer as a single entity to deal with their problem, you’ve also shown you’re human.
And that’s all some people want at the end of the day. To know that there’s someone there.
Jonathan
Hi.
I think it’s great that we (as online merchants) get to interact with our customers / potential customers in such a direct and open manner. Business transparency is bandied about a lot but it really is the only way to do it properly.
And online, there’s nowhere to hide.
So rejoice in the opportunity and if you’ve messed up, then by showing publicly how you deal with that – ultimately gives you more opportunities to do business because you’ll have not only shown you care enough about the one customer as a single entity to deal with their problem, you’ve also shown you’re human.
And that’s all some people want at the end of the day. To know that there’s someone there.
Jonathan
Right on all counts. I would add that the best companies (and people, for that matter) take passionate criticism as a sign that someone really deeply cares about them and wants them to do better work.
To wit, I had a conversation with a friend of mine who works for Valve Software, who have a new game coming out called Left for Dead 2 (sequel to last years l4d). Valve has a long tradition of supporting its games years after they’re released with patches, new content, etc, so when a sequel was announced so quickly after the original was released, some fans were understandably worried, and launched an online petition to protest the release.
The Valve people heard about this (Because they listen to their customers) and, instead of offering a rebuttal, or trying to shut it down, instead decided to fly them out to Seattle at their own expense, gave them a full studio tour, and let them play the brand new version before anyone else got to. When they got back, they posted that they were wrong about what they said, and wanted to let everyone know that the new game is great and they’re really looking forward to it.
And of course that story travelled far and wide, and pre-orders for the new game are way up compared to pre-orders for the original.
This, to me, is a perfect example of recognizing the value of your company and using it to the benefit of your end users. I wish more places would think that way.
Right on all counts. I would add that the best companies (and people, for that matter) take passionate criticism as a sign that someone really deeply cares about them and wants them to do better work.
To wit, I had a conversation with a friend of mine who works for Valve Software, who have a new game coming out called Left for Dead 2 (sequel to last years l4d). Valve has a long tradition of supporting its games years after they’re released with patches, new content, etc, so when a sequel was announced so quickly after the original was released, some fans were understandably worried, and launched an online petition to protest the release.
The Valve people heard about this (Because they listen to their customers) and, instead of offering a rebuttal, or trying to shut it down, instead decided to fly them out to Seattle at their own expense, gave them a full studio tour, and let them play the brand new version before anyone else got to. When they got back, they posted that they were wrong about what they said, and wanted to let everyone know that the new game is great and they’re really looking forward to it.
And of course that story travelled far and wide, and pre-orders for the new game are way up compared to pre-orders for the original.
This, to me, is a perfect example of recognizing the value of your company and using it to the benefit of your end users. I wish more places would think that way.
Amber,
I agree with your point that companies have the same amount of control over their brand message now, as they did before the social revolution.
However I would push back on number one when talking of companies with multiple blogging employees. I see a tremendous amount of fear that an employee might say something counter to the sanctioned image, content, or message that the corporate entity is putting out there.
Mark Cuban was quoted taking this stance in the Israel/Scoble book Naked Conversations.
Without formal reviews and approval processes of outgoing content from individual employee bloggers, how can companies get over their fear of losing control of the message they’re sending out before it hits the consumer?
Amber,
I agree with your point that companies have the same amount of control over their brand message now, as they did before the social revolution.
However I would push back on number one when talking of companies with multiple blogging employees. I see a tremendous amount of fear that an employee might say something counter to the sanctioned image, content, or message that the corporate entity is putting out there.
Mark Cuban was quoted taking this stance in the Israel/Scoble book Naked Conversations.
Without formal reviews and approval processes of outgoing content from individual employee bloggers, how can companies get over their fear of losing control of the message they’re sending out before it hits the consumer?
Amber,
I agree with your point that companies have the same amount of control over their brand message now, as they did before the social revolution.
However I would push back on number one when talking of companies with multiple blogging employees. I see a tremendous amount of fear that an employee might say something counter to the sanctioned image, content, or message that the corporate entity is putting out there.
Mark Cuban was quoted taking this stance in the Israel/Scoble book Naked Conversations.
Without formal reviews and approval processes of outgoing content from individual employee bloggers, how can companies get over their fear of losing control of the message they’re sending out before it hits the consumer?
Great entry! It’s a big problem here in Poland that many companies don’t allow their employees to interact with customers. They are affraid that they won’t act properly, but everyone from client service departament knows much better problems of typical customer then “big fishes”..
Great entry! It’s a big problem here in Poland that many companies don’t allow their employees to interact with customers. They are affraid that they won’t act properly, but everyone from client service departament knows much better problems of typical customer then “big fishes”..
Great entry! It’s a big problem here in Poland that many companies don’t allow their employees to interact with customers. They are affraid that they won’t act properly, but everyone from client service departament knows much better problems of typical customer then “big fishes”..
Amber,
I love this line: “Now, you’ve got more accountability and expectations surrounding your business because of social media.”
Businesses need to realize that even if they choose to not “get into that whole social media thing” (refer to Mr. Blanchard’s post, of course), they will be held to the new standards for listening and responding. Just as “we don’t have a web site” is not an acceptable answer for no immediately available information online (from the company directly, anyway 🙂 “We don’t use social media” is becoming an unacceptable answer to not knowing your customer’s pain points or what is happening to you brand out there.
Businesses and brands can choose not to listen, but they need to recognize that is the choice they’re making… not “we’re not going to do social media.”
Mandy
I agree with you on all accounts here. The line “Now, you’ve got more accountability and expectations surrounding your business because of social media.” says it all.
To add to here, yes businesses who chose not to engage in social media are making the choice but they need to recognize that just because they are not does not mean that the conversation will not be happening. In the past a good or bad experience was shared with a few friends, but now it is shared with an entire community.
Amber – great post. The consumer cannot control the brand. They may influence by not not purchasing and sharing why they are not supporting the product or service but they cannot control your message which is your brand.
Amber,
I love this line: “Now, you’ve got more accountability and expectations surrounding your business because of social media.”
Businesses need to realize that even if they choose to not “get into that whole social media thing” (refer to Mr. Blanchard’s post, of course), they will be held to the new standards for listening and responding. Just as “we don’t have a web site” is not an acceptable answer for no immediately available information online (from the company directly, anyway 🙂 “We don’t use social media” is becoming an unacceptable answer to not knowing your customer’s pain points or what is happening to you brand out there.
Businesses and brands can choose not to listen, but they need to recognize that is the choice they’re making… not “we’re not going to do social media.”
Mandy
I agree with you on all accounts here. The line “Now, you’ve got more accountability and expectations surrounding your business because of social media.” says it all.
To add to here, yes businesses who chose not to engage in social media are making the choice but they need to recognize that just because they are not does not mean that the conversation will not be happening. In the past a good or bad experience was shared with a few friends, but now it is shared with an entire community.
Amber – great post. The consumer cannot control the brand. They may influence by not not purchasing and sharing why they are not supporting the product or service but they cannot control your message which is your brand.
Amber, this post does a good job of talking about HOW WE CAN exert an appropriate level of control in the new paradigm of open communication. Thanks for talking about what we CAN do.
I’m often struck by “You are not in control” message in the myriad of presentations I see. It’s often intended as a wakeup call… and it’s like it means we should all run around like the sky is falling and feel insecure.
Ultimately, I think we’re seeing companies with UNEMPOWERED front lines scrambling to figure out how they’re going to operationalize social media in a way that feels more secure and comfortable. And you’ve pointed to some of the problems these companies face (e.g. hiring problem, training problem – but not about the tools). I think it’s a matter of adjusting to the new reality. The ones that really, really suck at customer service will have the hardest time on a number of levels.
Amber, this post does a good job of talking about HOW WE CAN exert an appropriate level of control in the new paradigm of open communication. Thanks for talking about what we CAN do.
I’m often struck by “You are not in control” message in the myriad of presentations I see. It’s often intended as a wakeup call… and it’s like it means we should all run around like the sky is falling and feel insecure.
Ultimately, I think we’re seeing companies with UNEMPOWERED front lines scrambling to figure out how they’re going to operationalize social media in a way that feels more secure and comfortable. And you’ve pointed to some of the problems these companies face (e.g. hiring problem, training problem – but not about the tools). I think it’s a matter of adjusting to the new reality. The ones that really, really suck at customer service will have the hardest time on a number of levels.
Amber,
Thanks for trying to parse an idea that may have confused more people than it has enlightened. I just think “losing control” is a bad metaphor in that it doesn’t really fit with the intended advice. As Muddy Waters sang, “you can’t lose a girl you ain’t never had.” It especially doesn’t make sense to advise people to “lose control” of things that they know they never had control of in the first place. The other thing is, I think 99% of the resistance to the idea of losing control (to the extent there has been any)is rightfully aimed at your point #1. The way some speak about this, you would think they’re advocating losing control over #1. Which as you correctly point out, would be a big mistake.
Amber,
Thanks for trying to parse an idea that may have confused more people than it has enlightened. I just think “losing control” is a bad metaphor in that it doesn’t really fit with the intended advice. As Muddy Waters sang, “you can’t lose a girl you ain’t never had.” It especially doesn’t make sense to advise people to “lose control” of things that they know they never had control of in the first place. The other thing is, I think 99% of the resistance to the idea of losing control (to the extent there has been any)is rightfully aimed at your point #1. The way some speak about this, you would think they’re advocating losing control over #1. Which as you correctly point out, would be a big mistake.
Amber,
Thanks for trying to parse an idea that may have confused more people than it has enlightened. I just think “losing control” is a bad metaphor in that it doesn’t really fit with the intended advice. As Muddy Waters sang, “you can’t lose a girl you ain’t never had.” It especially doesn’t make sense to advise people to “lose control” of things that they know they never had control of in the first place. The other thing is, I think 99% of the resistance to the idea of losing control (to the extent there has been any)is rightfully aimed at your point #1. The way some speak about this, you would think they’re advocating losing control over #1. Which as you correctly point out, would be a big mistake.
nteresting post that I fear will be either “too obvious” for folks responsible for corporate reputation (trust your employees) or too frightening for everyone else with some touch on a brand or reputation (you want me to trust my employees?). Ultimately, arguments about engaging in social media are nothing but smoke screens. These conversations achieve just one thing … they take away from BIG PICTURE thinking.
Regardless of your current point of view on Social Media and Control or the channels in question, corporate and brand reputation would be best served by shifting perspectives. Too much attention is paid to WHO is saying what, WHERE they are saying and WHY it’s happening at all. These conversations are bumpy, inefficient service roads away from the shared goal…the WHAT. And, whether communications is social or otherwise, the WHAT is always about Building and Maintaining a Strong Reputation.
Throw away useless discussions about who can talk about the company, where those conversations should happen and why do we support or limit such engagement. Focus efforts, debates, intellect on WHAT outcome or result we want. Define the end game FIRST and the specifics to getting there will follow.
There’s a great analogy, which I won’t do justice to and apologize in advance, about big picture thinking. Two men were working in a quarry cutting stones when the boss came by and asked the first man what he was working on. The first man told the boss about the stone he was cutting and the sizes he needed to complete his work. The boss asked the second man the same question and was told “I’m building the Taj Mahal.”
Channels are channels and you wouldn’t waste precious human capital discussing the value of billboards over broadcast, would you? The same litmus test holds true for social media. Next time the conversation turns toward the benefit/ROI of social media simply admit upfront that companies never had control of messages. Then, turn the issue on its head and discuss what your company’s Taj Mahal is. Remove the smoke screens and force folks to engage on your terms.
nteresting post that I fear will be either “too obvious” for folks responsible for corporate reputation (trust your employees) or too frightening for everyone else with some touch on a brand or reputation (you want me to trust my employees?). Ultimately, arguments about engaging in social media are nothing but smoke screens. These conversations achieve just one thing … they take away from BIG PICTURE thinking.
Regardless of your current point of view on Social Media and Control or the channels in question, corporate and brand reputation would be best served by shifting perspectives. Too much attention is paid to WHO is saying what, WHERE they are saying and WHY it’s happening at all. These conversations are bumpy, inefficient service roads away from the shared goal…the WHAT. And, whether communications is social or otherwise, the WHAT is always about Building and Maintaining a Strong Reputation.
Throw away useless discussions about who can talk about the company, where those conversations should happen and why do we support or limit such engagement. Focus efforts, debates, intellect on WHAT outcome or result we want. Define the end game FIRST and the specifics to getting there will follow.
There’s a great analogy, which I won’t do justice to and apologize in advance, about big picture thinking. Two men were working in a quarry cutting stones when the boss came by and asked the first man what he was working on. The first man told the boss about the stone he was cutting and the sizes he needed to complete his work. The boss asked the second man the same question and was told “I’m building the Taj Mahal.”
Channels are channels and you wouldn’t waste precious human capital discussing the value of billboards over broadcast, would you? The same litmus test holds true for social media. Next time the conversation turns toward the benefit/ROI of social media simply admit upfront that companies never had control of messages. Then, turn the issue on its head and discuss what your company’s Taj Mahal is. Remove the smoke screens and force folks to engage on your terms.
nteresting post that I fear will be either “too obvious” for folks responsible for corporate reputation (trust your employees) or too frightening for everyone else with some touch on a brand or reputation (you want me to trust my employees?). Ultimately, arguments about engaging in social media are nothing but smoke screens. These conversations achieve just one thing … they take away from BIG PICTURE thinking.
Regardless of your current point of view on Social Media and Control or the channels in question, corporate and brand reputation would be best served by shifting perspectives. Too much attention is paid to WHO is saying what, WHERE they are saying and WHY it’s happening at all. These conversations are bumpy, inefficient service roads away from the shared goal…the WHAT. And, whether communications is social or otherwise, the WHAT is always about Building and Maintaining a Strong Reputation.
Throw away useless discussions about who can talk about the company, where those conversations should happen and why do we support or limit such engagement. Focus efforts, debates, intellect on WHAT outcome or result we want. Define the end game FIRST and the specifics to getting there will follow.
There’s a great analogy, which I won’t do justice to and apologize in advance, about big picture thinking. Two men were working in a quarry cutting stones when the boss came by and asked the first man what he was working on. The first man told the boss about the stone he was cutting and the sizes he needed to complete his work. The boss asked the second man the same question and was told “I’m building the Taj Mahal.”
Channels are channels and you wouldn’t waste precious human capital discussing the value of billboards over broadcast, would you? The same litmus test holds true for social media. Next time the conversation turns toward the benefit/ROI of social media simply admit upfront that companies never had control of messages. Then, turn the issue on its head and discuss what your company’s Taj Mahal is. Remove the smoke screens and force folks to engage on your terms.
Hi Amber
Nice article on a timely topic.
I think the key point is that nothing has changed with regard to control. Companies can still control what they/their people say about their products/services and they have no control over what people outside the company say about them…but they never did. Social Media didn’t create that situation; it existed in the days of pony express.
Social media just makes it easier for ideas to spread and for any voice to be heard. It that sense it benefits companies because they can listen to what they might have previously missed. It also benefits them because they can engage in those conversations.
The real issue is not the conversation. It is what is being discussed…if you are remarkable, in a good way OR a bad way, people will talk about you. The whole United Breaks Guitars video prompted me to blog about this very topic a few weeks back.
What companies can and should control is the quality of what they do. If they do that, they’ll like the conversations they hear.
Hi Amber
Nice article on a timely topic.
I think the key point is that nothing has changed with regard to control. Companies can still control what they/their people say about their products/services and they have no control over what people outside the company say about them…but they never did. Social Media didn’t create that situation; it existed in the days of pony express.
Social media just makes it easier for ideas to spread and for any voice to be heard. It that sense it benefits companies because they can listen to what they might have previously missed. It also benefits them because they can engage in those conversations.
The real issue is not the conversation. It is what is being discussed…if you are remarkable, in a good way OR a bad way, people will talk about you. The whole United Breaks Guitars video prompted me to blog about this very topic a few weeks back.
What companies can and should control is the quality of what they do. If they do that, they’ll like the conversations they hear.
Well done. As if Viktor Frankl had written “Brands Search for Meaning.” Hey, that sounds like a good blog post. I’m going to do that and, of course, will give you the shout out.
Well done. As if Viktor Frankl had written “Brands Search for Meaning.” Hey, that sounds like a good blog post. I’m going to do that and, of course, will give you the shout out.
Well done. As if Viktor Frankl had written “Brands Search for Meaning.” Hey, that sounds like a good blog post. I’m going to do that and, of course, will give you the shout out.
I think pointing out that companies have as much control as they ever did is so important. The big whigs and CEOs tend to think that just because they aren’t all over the news, they are in control. Social media opens up the doors for MORE influence because they can hear what people are saying, what they want, and how they want it. Great post.
I think pointing out that companies have as much control as they ever did is so important. The big whigs and CEOs tend to think that just because they aren’t all over the news, they are in control. Social media opens up the doors for MORE influence because they can hear what people are saying, what they want, and how they want it. Great post.
The concern I keep seeing come up in this discussion is (via Chris Hall) “fear that an employee might say something counter to the sanctioned image, content, or message that the corporate entity is putting out there.”
My answer:
1. Establishing clear social media guidelines (more IBM than ESPN).
2. Initially, selecting what employees should participate in pilot SM programs. This would be based on their roles within the co. and their ability to participate professionally and effectively. (I am talking about an assessment of personality, motivation and critical skills.)
3. Training, training, training and more training. You can’t expect your employees to just figure out how to do this on their own and not screw up. Someone has to educate them, train them and mentor them to help the process along.
If you build this framework and deliver on its promise of creating a somewhat controlled environment, I think that you can alleviate those fears to a great extent.
The concern I keep seeing come up in this discussion is (via Chris Hall) “fear that an employee might say something counter to the sanctioned image, content, or message that the corporate entity is putting out there.”
My answer:
1. Establishing clear social media guidelines (more IBM than ESPN).
2. Initially, selecting what employees should participate in pilot SM programs. This would be based on their roles within the co. and their ability to participate professionally and effectively. (I am talking about an assessment of personality, motivation and critical skills.)
3. Training, training, training and more training. You can’t expect your employees to just figure out how to do this on their own and not screw up. Someone has to educate them, train them and mentor them to help the process along.
If you build this framework and deliver on its promise of creating a somewhat controlled environment, I think that you can alleviate those fears to a great extent.
The concern I keep seeing come up in this discussion is (via Chris Hall) “fear that an employee might say something counter to the sanctioned image, content, or message that the corporate entity is putting out there.”
My answer:
1. Establishing clear social media guidelines (more IBM than ESPN).
2. Initially, selecting what employees should participate in pilot SM programs. This would be based on their roles within the co. and their ability to participate professionally and effectively. (I am talking about an assessment of personality, motivation and critical skills.)
3. Training, training, training and more training. You can’t expect your employees to just figure out how to do this on their own and not screw up. Someone has to educate them, train them and mentor them to help the process along.
If you build this framework and deliver on its promise of creating a somewhat controlled environment, I think that you can alleviate those fears to a great extent.
Amber,
Agree on all 3 counts. Brands still have full control of the stimuli and hence in a good position to influence social media conversations.
My recent posts might be of interest to the readers. “Consumers were in charge even before social media” http://bit.ly/SRXOn and “Marketing priority for social media success” http://bit.ly/llzXc.
Amber,
Agree on all 3 counts. Brands still have full control of the stimuli and hence in a good position to influence social media conversations.
My recent posts might be of interest to the readers. “Consumers were in charge even before social media” http://bit.ly/SRXOn and “Marketing priority for social media success” http://bit.ly/llzXc.
Social media marketing without authentic personal branding is bull http://bit.ly/jt14N
You know what’s bull, Rodney? Using social media to drop crappy, spammy links to your junk on my blog. Good luck with that.
Social media marketing without authentic personal branding is bull http://bit.ly/jt14N
I really wanted to write a simple message to be able to thank you for all the remarkable concepts you are writing here. My particularly long internet look up has at the end been recognized with reputable points to share with my visitors. I ‘d believe that we visitors are quite blessed to be in a fabulous site with so many brilliant professionals with interesting tactics. I feel very grateful to have used your entire webpage and look forward to tons of more fun times reading here. Thank you again for everything. External Cladding
I really wanted to write a simple message to be able to thank you for all the remarkable concepts you are writing here. My particularly long internet look up has at the end been recognized with reputable points to share with my visitors. I ‘d believe that we visitors are quite blessed to be in a fabulous site with so many brilliant professionals with interesting tactics. I feel very grateful to have used your entire webpage and look forward to tons of more fun times reading here. Thank you again for everything. External Cladding
External Cladding is used to
enhance the exterior or interior of a building. It can be used on existing
decorated surfaces or un-decorated surfaces i.e.; plastered walls, brick walls
etc. External Cladding usually
consists of large hygienic plastic sheets, of various sizes and design. The
decorative external cladding panels
are joined to each other, and these are secured to the walls with screws. The
fixings or screws are hidden by the cladding itself, and this makes a more
visually appealing installation. External Cladding
External Cladding is used to
enhance the exterior or interior of a building. It can be used on existing
decorated surfaces or un-decorated surfaces i.e.; plastered walls, brick walls
etc. External Cladding usually
consists of large hygienic plastic sheets, of various sizes and design. The
decorative external cladding panels
are joined to each other, and these are secured to the walls with screws. The
fixings or screws are hidden by the cladding itself, and this makes a more
visually appealing installation. External Cladding
Heya i am for the first time here. I found this board and I find It really useful & it helped me out much. I hope to give something back and help others like you aided me.
http://www.ptdoors.co.il/
Heya i am for the first time here. I found this board and I find It really useful & it helped me out much. I hope to give something back and help others like you aided me.
http://www.ptdoors.co.il/
I’ve been surfing online more than three hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. In my opinion, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be a lot more useful than ever before.http://www.ptdoors.co.il/
Aw, this was a very nice post. In idea I would like to put in writing like this moreover – taking time and actual effort to make an excellent article… however what can I say… I procrastinate alot and under no circumstances appear to get one thing done.
I’m impressed, I need to say. Actually rarely do I encounter a blog that’s each educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you might have hit the nail on the head. Your concept is excellent; the problem is one thing that not sufficient people are talking intelligently about. I’m very pleased that I stumbled across this in my seek for something referring to this.
Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thank you Nonetheless I’m experiencing concern with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting similar rss drawback? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Thnkx
http://www.flotech.net/copiers-multifunction-systems
Boston Copiers
Aw, this was a very nice post. In idea I would like to put in writing like this moreover – taking time and actual effort to make an excellent article… however what can I say… I procrastinate alot and under no circumstances appear to get one thing done.
I’m impressed, I need to say. Actually rarely do I encounter a blog that’s each educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you might have hit the nail on the head. Your concept is excellent; the problem is one thing that not sufficient people are talking intelligently about. I’m very pleased that I stumbled across this in my seek for something referring to this.
Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thank you Nonetheless I’m experiencing concern with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting similar rss drawback? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Thnkx
http://www.flotech.net/copiers-multifunction-systems
Boston Copiers
WONDERFUL Post.thanks for share..more wait .. …
There are definitely loads of particulars like that to take into consideration. That could be a nice level to bring up. I provide the thoughts above as normal inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you carry up where the most important thing can be working in honest good faith. I don?t know if finest practices have emerged around things like that, but I am sure that your job is clearly identified as a fair game. Both boys and girls feel the impression of just a moment’s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.
Atlanta Office Products
http://www.egpatlanta.com/copiers-printers/copiers-multifunction-systems
WONDERFUL Post.thanks for share..more wait .. …
There are definitely loads of particulars like that to take into consideration. That could be a nice level to bring up. I provide the thoughts above as normal inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you carry up where the most important thing can be working in honest good faith. I don?t know if finest practices have emerged around things like that, but I am sure that your job is clearly identified as a fair game. Both boys and girls feel the impression of just a moment’s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.
Atlanta Office Products
http://www.egpatlanta.com/copiers-printers/copiers-multifunction-systems
You made some respectable factors there. I regarded on the internet for the issue and located most people will associate with together with your website.
Would you be all in favour of exchanging links?
Folding Machines Albany
http://www.edanded.com/mailing-solutions
Nice post. I be taught one thing more challenging on completely different blogs everyday. It would at all times be stimulating to read content material from other writers and observe a bit one thing from their store. I’d choose to use some with the content on my blog whether you don’t mind. Natually I’ll give you a link on your internet blog. Thanks for sharing.
I found your weblog site on google and verify a number of of your early posts. Continue to maintain up the superb operate. I just additional up your RSS feed to my MSN Information Reader. Searching for forward to studying extra from you in a while!…
SEO Boise
http://www.tributemedia.com/boise
Nice post. I be taught one thing more challenging on completely different blogs everyday. It would at all times be stimulating to read content material from other writers and observe a bit one thing from their store. I’d choose to use some with the content on my blog whether you don’t mind. Natually I’ll give you a link on your internet blog. Thanks for sharing.
I found your weblog site on google and verify a number of of your early posts. Continue to maintain up the superb operate. I just additional up your RSS feed to my MSN Information Reader. Searching for forward to studying extra from you in a while!…
SEO Boise
http://www.tributemedia.com/boise
I want to express my appreciation to you just for bailing me out of this crisis. Just after researching through the the net and seeing basics which were not productive, I assumed my entire life was well over. Living without the solutions to the problems you have resolved by means of your guideline is a crucial case, and those which could have in a wrong way affected my entire career if I had not noticed your website. Your good mastery and kindness in taking care of all things was very helpful. I am not sure what I would have done if I had not come across such a solution like this. It’s possible to at this moment look ahead to my future. Thanks a lot very much for this specialized and effective guide. I will not hesitate to endorse your site to any individual who would like direction on this problem.
http://www.admissionhook.com
I want to express my appreciation to you just for bailing me out of this crisis. Just after researching through the the net and seeing basics which were not productive, I assumed my entire life was well over. Living without the solutions to the problems you have resolved by means of your guideline is a crucial case, and those which could have in a wrong way affected my entire career if I had not noticed your website. Your good mastery and kindness in taking care of all things was very helpful. I am not sure what I would have done if I had not come across such a solution like this. It’s possible to at this moment look ahead to my future. Thanks a lot very much for this specialized and effective guide. I will not hesitate to endorse your site to any individual who would like direction on this problem.
http://www.admissionhook.com
I must express my love for your kindness in support of persons that require help with in this subject matter. Your personal commitment to passing the solution up and down has been especially powerful and has continuously helped associates like me to achieve their goals. Your informative publication means much a person like me and much more to my peers. Thanks a lot; from all of us.
http://www.admissionhook.com
I just wanted to write down a small word to be able to say thanks to you for these splendid points you are giving out on this website. My considerable internet look up has at the end of the day been paid with extremely good insight to go over with my visitors. I ‘d assume that most of us visitors are extremely fortunate to be in a superb network with very many awesome professionals with great suggestions. I feel pretty lucky to have used your entire web page and look forward to really more fabulous minutes reading here. Thanks once more for everything.
Scholarships for high school
seniors
I just wanted to write down a small word to be able to say thanks to you for these splendid points you are giving out on this website. My considerable internet look up has at the end of the day been paid with extremely good insight to go over with my visitors. I ‘d assume that most of us visitors are extremely fortunate to be in a superb network with very many awesome professionals with great suggestions. I feel pretty lucky to have used your entire web page and look forward to really more fabulous minutes reading here. Thanks once more for everything.
Scholarships for high school
seniors
Thank you a lot for providing individuals with such a pleasant chance to read critical reviews from here. It’s always very awesome and also full of amusement for me and my office fellow workers to visit your site on the least 3 times a week to see the new issues you will have. And indeed, we’re actually impressed considering the unbelievable thoughts you serve. Some 1 facts in this posting are ultimately the very best we’ve ever had.
http://www.collegetreasure.com
Thank you a lot for providing individuals with such a pleasant chance to read critical reviews from here. It’s always very awesome and also full of amusement for me and my office fellow workers to visit your site on the least 3 times a week to see the new issues you will have. And indeed, we’re actually impressed considering the unbelievable thoughts you serve. Some 1 facts in this posting are ultimately the very best we’ve ever had.
http://www.collegetreasure.com
I not to mention my guys ended up looking at the good things found on your web site and then all of the sudden came up with a terrible feeling I never expressed respect to the site owner for those strategies. These guys came as a consequence happy to learn them and now have pretty much been loving those things. We appreciate you really being quite helpful and then for having this kind of cool useful guides millions of individuals are really needing to know about. My very own sincere apologies for not saying thanks to you earlier.
http://www.collegetreasure.com