The post I wrote last week on 13 Truths about Social Media Measurement did well, and I thought it would be interesting to look at some stats around it in detail. As of today, it’s in the top 10 posts on my blog in terms of visits/traffic of all time (and that’s just a few days after it posted).
So this is a bit of a post mortem on that post, what happened around, it, and some conclusions I can draw about it.
Note that the intent here is NOT to get you tangled up in my specific numbers. My numbers are what I have to work with, so that’s what I’m using. It’s all in the relative data. The hope is that I’ll help you consider how you might analyze your own blog performance, content, or other initiatives, and illustrate a bit about the longer term results of a blogging investment.
Analysis Period
For ease of tracking and a solid, uncluttered snapshot, I did this analysis for the 24 hour period from when the post hit to the following day at the same time. So this is not an analysis “to date” of this post, but it’ll certainly be interesting to revisit this content in 30 days and do some analysis around the lifespan of a popular post. For the purposes of pulling together this post, I had to draw a line in the sand somewhere.
Specific Statistics:
Bit.ly link: 1,613 clicks
Website visits: 3,192
I get anywhere between 40K and 60K uniques a month right now (with the exception of March where I surged to 100K in large part because of this post). So this post represents about 6% of my total monthly traffic for May.
Other Stats: (various sources)
Comments: 31
Shared Items (Google): 84
Delicious Bookmarks: 126
Facebook Shares: 48
Likes: 14
Traffic Sources: (per Google Analytics)
Direct: 31%
Feedburner: 15%
Twitter: 12%
Google (organic): 5%
Delicious: 5%
# of Tweets of the post: 702 (analysis by Radian6)
30% of the posts did NOT include my name, blog name, or twitter handle. just the article title.
15% of the posts didn’t include the “13 Truths” part of the title, and amended it to their own language.
There’s undoubtedly an additional slush factor in those that replied, shared, etc and included a link but totally different language or words. That’s gravy, in my mind. This tells me that when you’re analyzing a post’s carry, you have to consider how it might morph in the translation and spread and realize you’ll always have a margin of error.
Potential Twitter Reach (also provided by Radian6): 2,466,697
I’m still not sold on the value of this number. It looks impressive on paper. But see the conclusions section below for some thoughts about it.
New subscriptions to the blog: +/- 200
I’d love to say this is perfectly accurate, but Feedburner doesn’t always play nice. I could have tracked this better by putting a unique subscription link with tracking code on the post itself, but others would have undoubtedly clicked the main sub link anyway.
To the best I can tell, I gained about 200 subscribers because of one post. That’s about a 6% conversion rate based on visits in the same time period. I’d also love to put in better tracking (using Google Analytics goals) to see how those subscriptions convert by referral sources, i.e. whether the traffic from Delicious bounces and leaves, or tends to actually subscribe and stick around.
Emails inquiring about speaking, input/consulting (which I don’t do): 4
Time Spent writing the blog post: approximately 60 minutes.
My former billing rate as a consultant averaged $275/hour. So you could say my investment was $275 worth of time. If were to take a single speaking engagement at even half my standard rate that found me because of this post, my ROI would be about 1700%. If I were in the consulting or service business, a single account landed this way could pay for itself several thousand times over.
That’s just for one post, though, that’s part of a long effort of blogging consistently and with purpose. See more in the conclusions about that.
Referrals to my company site (Radian6): none
Of note here is that I didn’t link to Radian6 or mention it anywhere in my post. Other posts I’ve done on measurement HAVE sent traffic through to the Radian6 site, but only when I’ve mentioned the company and linked to it specifically (or my guest author has; this post that Matt wrote last week drove nice traffic through to Radian6’s website). More on that below.
Other Conclusions, Thoughts, and Analysis
Twitter
It’s clearly a key place for me to continue sharing my content, as it gets good reach. Half the traffic for the day can be attributed to the bit.ly link, which I only shared on Twitter. On the other hand, it’s important for me to consider more avenues for distributing content in the future, because I’m putting too many of my eggs in the Twitter basket right now.
There were 686 tweets of the post and 1,613 clicks on the shortened link, which means that every tweet accounted for an average of 2.35 clicks.
Also important to note: my potential “impressions” on Twitter were nearly 2.5 million. It goes without saying that the percentage of inactive accounts on Twitter – some say as many as 70-80% – skews these numbers. And if there were only 1,613 clicks out of those 2.5 million impressions? That’s an overall conversion rate from attention to action (in this case just a click) of WAY less than 1% (.0006% to be exact).
What would be interesting is to somehow figure out where those 686 tweets and their subsequent clicks fall in within my network (i.e. are they direct connections, or separated by a couple of degrees), and somehow map the resulting click throughs to those degrees of separation. That could start showing how “impressions” on Twitter dilute (or not) as they drift away from the original source, or from close connections. My hypothesis is that the heavy percentage of the actual traffic would come from the first couple of degrees.
That’s more than I have the chops for right now, though. I’d need some API help with that one.
Delicious
Delicious bookmarks can drive great traffic too, but the types of posts that get bookmarked there are of a specific stripe that I can’t just churn out constantly.
This one hit the Delicious “Popular” posts page, which undoubtedly helped raise some awareness for the post and generated some traffic.
Posts on measurement are clearly still very wanted and well read, so that’s a viable content subject. List posts work, as all of the last several list posts I’ve done have hit Delicious pretty well and driven significant traffic. Good intel for content strategy, but obviously not something you can do every day. Fatigue for content counts for something, so the popular, bookmarkable stuff has to be interspersed with other content.
Radian6 Referrals
My blog can and does drive visible traffic and leads to Radian6. So it’s a good way to keep my bosses invested in the idea that spending time on my own blog is a good thing for THEM. But if that’s part of my goal (and it is), I have to be sure and specifically ASK readers to go there (by means of mentioning my company and linking to it in a post, with disclosure of course). Obviously I can’t do that all the time, or folks would see me as a walking plug for my employer. But it’s something to keep in mind.
Content Spread
This post also got picked up in some newsletters, other publications, and aggregate sites (with permission and attribution). It also got picked up by annoying scraper sites that don’t credit or link back to the original work.
Practical, educational content spreads. And it finds new life in other channels and more mainstream industry publications if it’s written to be applicable to more than the immediate audience. Even the spammers and scrapers like to pick up content that’s driving traffic.
Also of note: Sticky titles and lists posts work well, and unique titles make for easier analysis and tracking of how they spread and get shared.
The Blogging Commitment
Blogging can pay off, big time. BUT. I’ve spent over two years building my audience, traffic, and consistently putting out content (some well received, some not). The burn is slow, and you have to keep earning the attention in order to keep it. I started at ZERO, just like everyone else.
It’s not enough to just get traffic. You have to get people that want to take a seat at the table and hang around for a while. I’d also love to find a way to analyze at what rate my existing subscribers share content and pass it along, as that can help me understand one aspect of long term subscriber value, and how invested my readers are in the content overall.
And what content works? Well, that’s a matter of listening to your audience, participating in the larger community, and delivering stuff that meets needs and interests of those people. Simple, right? Nope. Lots of work. Time. Effort. Learning.
Can You Apply Any of This?
This wasn’t so much intended to show the performance of a single post as to get you thinking about how you can analyze the performance of your content, and measure some readily available things in order to draw some insights about what you’re doing.
I’m not doing this for every post, of course, but by focusing my analysis on the far ends of the scale – the posts that are ghost towns and the ones that go gangbusters – I can continually understand what my audience, social network communities, and other people are finding worth reading. And this is hardly professional, bullet-proof analyst-level drilldown, but what do I need that for? More work than it’s worth. At this point I’m just looking for some validation of my hypotheses.
So was this helpful to you? Again, don’t get mired in my specific stats, but look at the methods, the data captures, the smashing together of a few different numbers to see how you might put a similar framework in front of the content you create to learn what’s working, what’s not, and help you fine tune your strategy.
Questions? Comments? I’m all ears.
Amber,
Always find it interesting when people share their stats, what works, doesnt work, etc. Thanks for sharing yours.
My follower numbers arent near the scale of yours but I have seen an interest in my content from LinkedIn. My LinkedIn network is mostly from people that I have personally done business with so they know me and my work. It also seems to be largely ignored by the blogging community so it is easier for the good ones to stand out.
If you are looking for another area to move into maybe LinkedIn might be a good fit?
Matt
Amber,
Always find it interesting when people share their stats, what works, doesnt work, etc. Thanks for sharing yours.
My follower numbers arent near the scale of yours but I have seen an interest in my content from LinkedIn. My LinkedIn network is mostly from people that I have personally done business with so they know me and my work. It also seems to be largely ignored by the blogging community so it is easier for the good ones to stand out.
If you are looking for another area to move into maybe LinkedIn might be a good fit?
Matt
So, what you’re saying is, if you want traffic and fame, you should write posts about how to measure social media metrics?
OK I WILL DO THAT THX.
*cough*
.-= Justin Kownacki´s last blog ..5 Thoughts on the Future of Media – 2010 Update =-.
Yeah, I figure there’s going to be some of that. Always is. 🙂
Amber – thank you for the instructional post. Did you incorporate re-posts via the LinkedIn “share” feature?
Justin – fabulous irony and supporting point for your solipsistic (and entertaining) framework on social media.
http://www.justinkownacki.com/2010/05/24/i-tweet-therefore-i-am-empty/
So, what you’re saying is, if you want traffic and fame, you should write posts about how to measure social media metrics?
OK I WILL DO THAT THX.
*cough*
.-= Justin Kownacki´s last blog ..5 Thoughts on the Future of Media – 2010 Update =-.
Yeah, I figure there’s going to be some of that. Always is. 🙂
Amber – thank you for the instructional post. Did you incorporate re-posts via the LinkedIn “share” feature?
Justin – fabulous irony and supporting point for your solipsistic (and entertaining) framework on social media.
http://www.justinkownacki.com/2010/05/24/i-tweet-therefore-i-am-empty/
I’d be interested to hear how long it took to put together these stats as well.
.-= Jeremy Meyers´s last blog ..The one question you must ask when interacting =-.
About an hour. Maybe less.
I’d be interested to hear how long it took to put together these stats as well.
.-= Jeremy Meyers´s last blog ..The one question you must ask when interacting =-.
About an hour. Maybe less.
Amber, thank you. Besides finding the numbers interesting, I like the simple, straight ahead reporting including the caveats you mention. Aaron
Glad it was useful! Thanks for sharing the post, too.
Amber, thank you. Besides finding the numbers interesting, I like the simple, straight ahead reporting including the caveats you mention. Aaron
Glad it was useful! Thanks for sharing the post, too.
Very interesting stats Amber. Always love to get an inside look at how people do and how well things work. I can agree with you on not being sold on the value of the Twitter reach. That’s a VERY high number but when taken into consideration the number of followers added together of those who tweeted your post, it’s very possible.
The fact is though, only a small percentage tend to see each tweet. Either way, it still worked out well for you!
.-= Mike Stenger´s last blog ..Why Video Isn’t Always The Answer =-.
Very interesting stats Amber. Always love to get an inside look at how people do and how well things work. I can agree with you on not being sold on the value of the Twitter reach. That’s a VERY high number but when taken into consideration the number of followers added together of those who tweeted your post, it’s very possible.
The fact is though, only a small percentage tend to see each tweet. Either way, it still worked out well for you!
.-= Mike Stenger´s last blog ..Why Video Isn’t Always The Answer =-.
I think this is one of your best posts ever. I love seeing the power of an individual post and getting a glimpse behind the scenes. Well done and thank you for sharing!
.-= Mark W Schaefer´s last blog ..Six ideas to build social media momentum =-.
I think this is one of your best posts ever. I love seeing the power of an individual post and getting a glimpse behind the scenes. Well done and thank you for sharing!
.-= Mark W Schaefer´s last blog ..Six ideas to build social media momentum =-.
That is a cool and compelling analysis. Unfortunately it is quite difficult to create. You will not be able to perform such analytics for every blog post.
We are creating a social media metrics application at http://www.twentyfeet.com that will centralize all your web stats in one place. We only have twitter, facebook and bit.ly so far. But I would love to get feedback from you guys about it, as soon as it gets live in the next weeks.
I hope, that one day we will be able to help with some metrics to do something similar to your description but in a more automated way.
What do you think?
I didn’t find it difficult, actually. Most of it was in Google Analytics and bit.ly stats. I pulled two stats via Radian6 that would have been hard to pull manually. The rest was basic math and some brainpower.
I’m curious about how you came across this post, and whether the subject interested you or whether you spotted an opportunity to plug your tool?
I was wondering the exact same thing Amber, and I’m impressed you asked it. Bravo.
That is a cool and compelling analysis. Unfortunately it is quite difficult to create. You will not be able to perform such analytics for every blog post.
We are creating a social media metrics application at http://www.twentyfeet.com that will centralize all your web stats in one place. We only have twitter, facebook and bit.ly so far. But I would love to get feedback from you guys about it, as soon as it gets live in the next weeks.
I hope, that one day we will be able to help with some metrics to do something similar to your description but in a more automated way.
What do you think?
I didn’t find it difficult, actually. Most of it was in Google Analytics and bit.ly stats. I pulled two stats via Radian6 that would have been hard to pull manually. The rest was basic math and some brainpower.
I’m curious about how you came across this post, and whether the subject interested you or whether you spotted an opportunity to plug your tool?
I was wondering the exact same thing Amber, and I’m impressed you asked it. Bravo.
Amber –
Imagine if you added an email newsletter to the mix – hmmm. Even if your content in the email was unique, you could/should still include a few links back to your recent posts. Also, I guarantee the return you’ll see on the emails will be higher than the average blog post. Crap. I lied. I can’t guarantee that, but … I can promise you that you’ll see a (positive) return.
It’s easy to track the numbers on email marketing efforts too.
Have I ‘sold’ you yet? Ha ha.
DJ Waldow
Director of Community, Blue Sky Factory
@djwaldow
.-= DJ Waldow´s last blog ..Stefan Pollard: You’ll Be Missed =-.
You know I’m sold. I just need a plan.
Amber –
Imagine if you added an email newsletter to the mix – hmmm. Even if your content in the email was unique, you could/should still include a few links back to your recent posts. Also, I guarantee the return you’ll see on the emails will be higher than the average blog post. Crap. I lied. I can’t guarantee that, but … I can promise you that you’ll see a (positive) return.
It’s easy to track the numbers on email marketing efforts too.
Have I ‘sold’ you yet? Ha ha.
DJ Waldow
Director of Community, Blue Sky Factory
@djwaldow
.-= DJ Waldow´s last blog ..Stefan Pollard: You’ll Be Missed =-.
You know I’m sold. I just need a plan.
Very interesting post. Love the data.
The number of non-direct Tweets is very interesting. This is an area oft-overlooked, as most people pay attention to mentions or @ replies, but not the bigger picture.
Indeed, the ROI on this post would be huge if you were a consultant, but that’s not really an economic truth. The ROI equation has to include all the time you’ve spend writing posts that didn’t get this type of reaction, plus your work commenting on other posts, on Twitter, on Facebook, on Linkedin, etc. Not to mention your public speaking.
And that’s what makes this so very hard. As was discussed in the post in question, your social media success is – by definition – an aggregation of a great many small wins and losses. It’s nearly impossible to draw a straight line between a single action and impact, which is why social analytics requires long-term trend data to prove itself.
To that end, the theoretically most valuable metric you cite (beyond immediate consulting offers, etc.) is RSS subscribers. Incremental progress yields long-term benefits. Why is why social is almost the exact opposite of traditional marketing, where immediate progress yields short-term benefits.
.-= Jay Baer´s last blog ..The More Things Change, The More Things Change =-.
Jay, exactly so. And it’s why I get ulcers during most ROI discussions. Investment is not usually a singular or simple element to quantify, especially in a communication framework where the long term impact of same is greater than the whole of its parts.
Part of the truth about measurement in most business arenas is that it’s more often messy. It’s rarely clean. So what I strive to help people understand is that measurement is diagnostic and a learning mechanism, not an absolute. Instead of simply looking at whether we reached some arbitrary score or standard, we ought to be figuring out whether our analysis is helping guide us toward better practice overall.
You and i think alike. We should write a book or something.
Jay and Amber: I’d read that book.
Amber: I realize this is more of an R6 question, but Jay brought up the “non-direct Tweets” … can I measure that using R6? If yes, let me know and I’ll learn how from my Account Manager.
Gracias.
DJ Waldow
Director of Community, Blue Sky Factory
@djwaldow
.-= DJ Waldow´s last blog ..Stefan Pollard: You’ll Be Missed =-.
DJ, yes if you broaden your search terms. So you have to consider other combinations of terms or phrases that might be used to share your post, and perhaps even search for character strings in a shortened link. You’ll never get all of them, but if you’re thoughtful about what you’re looking for, you can certainly cast the net more widely.
Very interesting post. Love the data.
The number of non-direct Tweets is very interesting. This is an area oft-overlooked, as most people pay attention to mentions or @ replies, but not the bigger picture.
Indeed, the ROI on this post would be huge if you were a consultant, but that’s not really an economic truth. The ROI equation has to include all the time you’ve spend writing posts that didn’t get this type of reaction, plus your work commenting on other posts, on Twitter, on Facebook, on Linkedin, etc. Not to mention your public speaking.
And that’s what makes this so very hard. As was discussed in the post in question, your social media success is – by definition – an aggregation of a great many small wins and losses. It’s nearly impossible to draw a straight line between a single action and impact, which is why social analytics requires long-term trend data to prove itself.
To that end, the theoretically most valuable metric you cite (beyond immediate consulting offers, etc.) is RSS subscribers. Incremental progress yields long-term benefits. Why is why social is almost the exact opposite of traditional marketing, where immediate progress yields short-term benefits.
.-= Jay Baer´s last blog ..The More Things Change, The More Things Change =-.
Jay, exactly so. And it’s why I get ulcers during most ROI discussions. Investment is not usually a singular or simple element to quantify, especially in a communication framework where the long term impact of same is greater than the whole of its parts.
Part of the truth about measurement in most business arenas is that it’s more often messy. It’s rarely clean. So what I strive to help people understand is that measurement is diagnostic and a learning mechanism, not an absolute. Instead of simply looking at whether we reached some arbitrary score or standard, we ought to be figuring out whether our analysis is helping guide us toward better practice overall.
You and i think alike. We should write a book or something.
Jay and Amber: I’d read that book.
Amber: I realize this is more of an R6 question, but Jay brought up the “non-direct Tweets” … can I measure that using R6? If yes, let me know and I’ll learn how from my Account Manager.
Gracias.
DJ Waldow
Director of Community, Blue Sky Factory
@djwaldow
.-= DJ Waldow´s last blog ..Stefan Pollard: You’ll Be Missed =-.
DJ, yes if you broaden your search terms. So you have to consider other combinations of terms or phrases that might be used to share your post, and perhaps even search for character strings in a shortened link. You’ll never get all of them, but if you’re thoughtful about what you’re looking for, you can certainly cast the net more widely.
I’ve had more than a few people want to ‘JV’ with me to develop their brand on their identity online – and then I make a percentage of the profits off of their sales directly from their site (many different people with products from boardgames, to books, to electronics).
I’ve always tried to explain how this isn’t good for ME because i am building more than just the direct sales that happen. These metrics are the sort of thing that help me to put further into words and showcase WHY it doesn’t make sense for me. The reach goes very wide and lasts a long time.
Great post Amber. I appreciate your candid nature in sharing the numbers and honesty about Radian6.
I’ve had more than a few people want to ‘JV’ with me to develop their brand on their identity online – and then I make a percentage of the profits off of their sales directly from their site (many different people with products from boardgames, to books, to electronics).
I’ve always tried to explain how this isn’t good for ME because i am building more than just the direct sales that happen. These metrics are the sort of thing that help me to put further into words and showcase WHY it doesn’t make sense for me. The reach goes very wide and lasts a long time.
Great post Amber. I appreciate your candid nature in sharing the numbers and honesty about Radian6.
Amber, thanks for sharing these stats. It’s very educational to us bloggers who are not as far along the path to see what works and how.
.-= John Soares´s last blog ..Pay-Per-Click Marketing: How Well Is It Working? =-.
Amber, thanks for sharing these stats. It’s very educational to us bloggers who are not as far along the path to see what works and how.
.-= John Soares´s last blog ..Pay-Per-Click Marketing: How Well Is It Working? =-.
This is the first time to your site and am very impressed.
Two specific things:
1. I like the straightforward manner you presented the information
2. I like the specificity of the numbers
Too often I read vague statistics, I got “a lot” of hits, subscriptions saw “tremendous growth” and the like. Having real numbers is VERY helpful.
I know this can be uncomfortable for the person revealing their stats so thank you for putting them out there.
I’ll be back.
.-= Siddhartha´s last blog ..Nurturing Imagination in a Reality-Driven World =-.
I have to be honest here: I’ve never understood the subterfuge behind sharing stats. Some folks have explained the advertising bit, some the whole insecurity of being “compared” to others, but the way I figure it, we all start somewhere. I don’t mind sharing at all if it helps someone learn or get a few ideas.
This is the first time to your site and am very impressed.
Two specific things:
1. I like the straightforward manner you presented the information
2. I like the specificity of the numbers
Too often I read vague statistics, I got “a lot” of hits, subscriptions saw “tremendous growth” and the like. Having real numbers is VERY helpful.
I know this can be uncomfortable for the person revealing their stats so thank you for putting them out there.
I’ll be back.
.-= Siddhartha´s last blog ..Nurturing Imagination in a Reality-Driven World =-.
I have to be honest here: I’ve never understood the subterfuge behind sharing stats. Some folks have explained the advertising bit, some the whole insecurity of being “compared” to others, but the way I figure it, we all start somewhere. I don’t mind sharing at all if it helps someone learn or get a few ideas.
It really was very helpful, because I want to start a blog about PR in English too, and I think measurement need to be there. Thank you!
.-= Phoebs´s last blog ..Pattern-uri =-.
It really was very helpful, because I want to start a blog about PR in English too, and I think measurement need to be there. Thank you!
.-= Phoebs´s last blog ..Pattern-uri =-.
I see three metrics of great significance here.
1. Number of new subscribers. Traffic is ultimately useless until it becomes your audience for good. Subscribers are audience.
2. Speaking engagements. In terms of stuff you can take to the bank, this was a major score. Many booking agencies would love to have a booking engine this powerful.
3. Email newsletter subscribers. You picked up some via the subscribe by email. Add a real newsletter per Mr. Waldow’s recommendations to secure more and you’ve got yourself a portable audience that can be directed and focused at any professional or personal objective.
.-= Christopher S. Penn´s last blog ..There is no secret sauce =-.
Yep, all good stuff. Email is in the plans for the new blog. With DJ’s help. 🙂
I see three metrics of great significance here.
1. Number of new subscribers. Traffic is ultimately useless until it becomes your audience for good. Subscribers are audience.
2. Speaking engagements. In terms of stuff you can take to the bank, this was a major score. Many booking agencies would love to have a booking engine this powerful.
3. Email newsletter subscribers. You picked up some via the subscribe by email. Add a real newsletter per Mr. Waldow’s recommendations to secure more and you’ve got yourself a portable audience that can be directed and focused at any professional or personal objective.
.-= Christopher S. Penn´s last blog ..There is no secret sauce =-.
Yep, all good stuff. Email is in the plans for the new blog. With DJ’s help. 🙂
Amber,
This a great glimpse behind the curtain.
Key point that not all traffic is created equal.
Would you rather have 1,000 people see it and 100 subscribe or 10,000 people view and 50 subscribe?
Just asking 🙂
Now come on. You know my answer to that one…
Amber,
This a great glimpse behind the curtain.
Key point that not all traffic is created equal.
Would you rather have 1,000 people see it and 100 subscribe or 10,000 people view and 50 subscribe?
Just asking 🙂
Now come on. You know my answer to that one…
Amber,
I’m a data nerd. This is sweet music to my eyeballs.
Twitter reach is an interesting metric – sure, the “potential” is there for the 2.4M+ Twitter users to see, click through and digest your content, but what are the odds that the 2.4M+ Twitter users are online, engaged, and relevant? (Especially relevant. I hear there are “spammers” on this internet thingie that are hell-bent on making sure I have a bad day.)
Like you, I agree that the data is a bit muddy, but 2.4M+ is an awfully nice number to roll around in your head. Without spending a dime (unless you count the opportunity cost to write the post), you’ve managed to reach an audience that would cost a television advertiser tens of thousands of dollars.
GOD, THE INTERNET IS SO FRIGGIN’ AWESOME.
Amber,
I’m a data nerd. This is sweet music to my eyeballs.
Twitter reach is an interesting metric – sure, the “potential” is there for the 2.4M+ Twitter users to see, click through and digest your content, but what are the odds that the 2.4M+ Twitter users are online, engaged, and relevant? (Especially relevant. I hear there are “spammers” on this internet thingie that are hell-bent on making sure I have a bad day.)
Like you, I agree that the data is a bit muddy, but 2.4M+ is an awfully nice number to roll around in your head. Without spending a dime (unless you count the opportunity cost to write the post), you’ve managed to reach an audience that would cost a television advertiser tens of thousands of dollars.
GOD, THE INTERNET IS SO FRIGGIN’ AWESOME.
Amber, thank you so much for this. So insightful. Besides all the great facts that I have soaked up, its so great to hear from an expert like you and to realize that my thinking and methodology for my clients is very similar. So I am on the right track. Good to know!
Yasmin
Amber, thank you so much for this. So insightful. Besides all the great facts that I have soaked up, its so great to hear from an expert like you and to realize that my thinking and methodology for my clients is very similar. So I am on the right track. Good to know!
Yasmin
This is great… it seems that everything can be backed out to a measured ROI
This is great… it seems that everything can be backed out to a measured ROI
Is it fair to stereotype the average blog does not pay for a Radian6 subscription but uses free statistical tools like Google Analytics and bit.ly’s own tracker, etc? For, that stereotype is what I encounter in my work with clients and bloggers.
I wonder if you could shed any light how your analysis with Radian6 would be different with free tools.
.-= Ari Herzog´s last blog ..BLOGGING IN CAPITAL LETTERS: YES OR NO? =-.
Ari, of course. Hence the disclosure. Radian6 isn’t intended to be a blogger’s analysis tool. I happen to have the benefit of it.
The only stats in here that were pulled from Radian6 were the aggregate Twitter reach, and the overall post count. Those things can both be done manually, though probably not to the same degree of accuracy, and with of course significantly more time to pull the numbers. Tracking the overall number of posts to the same degree of granularity would be significantly more time consuming and difficult, especially considering the variations on keywords I was looking for. That’s part of the benefit to even some of the more modest paid tools; they do some of the gathering and counting for you based on several search parameters that are significantly more difficult to do manually.
The remaining stats were all pulled with free tools, including Google Analytics, Bit.ly, Delicious, etc.
Is it fair to stereotype the average blog does not pay for a Radian6 subscription but uses free statistical tools like Google Analytics and bit.ly’s own tracker, etc? For, that stereotype is what I encounter in my work with clients and bloggers.
I wonder if you could shed any light how your analysis with Radian6 would be different with free tools.
.-= Ari Herzog´s last blog ..BLOGGING IN CAPITAL LETTERS: YES OR NO? =-.
Ari, of course. Hence the disclosure. Radian6 isn’t intended to be a blogger’s analysis tool. I happen to have the benefit of it.
The only stats in here that were pulled from Radian6 were the aggregate Twitter reach, and the overall post count. Those things can both be done manually, though probably not to the same degree of accuracy, and with of course significantly more time to pull the numbers. Tracking the overall number of posts to the same degree of granularity would be significantly more time consuming and difficult, especially considering the variations on keywords I was looking for. That’s part of the benefit to even some of the more modest paid tools; they do some of the gathering and counting for you based on several search parameters that are significantly more difficult to do manually.
The remaining stats were all pulled with free tools, including Google Analytics, Bit.ly, Delicious, etc.
I would like to add:
Blog posts are SEO inventory. Do a market analysis on keyword search volume/search relevance to your band. Optimize each post around keywords of value and share each post out and attach the same keyword to the appropriate #hastag and same keyword tags. This drives organic rankings which will give you a higher conversion %.
d
.-= Derek Showerman´s last blog ..Reputation Management & It’s Effect on SEO & Social Media =-.
I would like to add:
Blog posts are SEO inventory. Do a market analysis on keyword search volume/search relevance to your band. Optimize each post around keywords of value and share each post out and attach the same keyword to the appropriate #hastag and same keyword tags. This drives organic rankings which will give you a higher conversion %.
d
.-= Derek Showerman´s last blog ..Reputation Management & It’s Effect on SEO & Social Media =-.
I love the analysis and all, great stuff.
The challenge for brands in this space becomes cost to generate a report like this against every asset, and the cost to synthesize all this data into a concrete, understandable and actionable report for the rest of the team.
Social measurement can easily become a black hole. There has to be a happy medium. And one of these days, someone very smart is going to nail it.
.-= Jon B´s last blog ..10 s-commerce best practices =-.
Jon, naturally. And it stands to be said that I don’t think you SHOULD be doing this analysis on every piece of content. What’s important are to pick those that represent significant *categories* or characteristics of content: especially popular content, especially UNpopular content, a few places in the middle. It’s about watching trends and correlative tendencies, not about obsessing over every minute and granular stat.
After all, the point of measuring is to understand how to ACT: stay the course, or change something. You don’t need every point on a graph to see which way the line is trending. So too with content mapping. It’s not worthwhile to track every asset, but rather to look at aggregate asset buckets over time, and spot the trends and patterns.
It’s time consuming to build initially, but once you have a system in place, it can actually become a rather fluid process.
I love the analysis and all, great stuff.
The challenge for brands in this space becomes cost to generate a report like this against every asset, and the cost to synthesize all this data into a concrete, understandable and actionable report for the rest of the team.
Social measurement can easily become a black hole. There has to be a happy medium. And one of these days, someone very smart is going to nail it.
.-= Jon B´s last blog ..10 s-commerce best practices =-.
Jon, naturally. And it stands to be said that I don’t think you SHOULD be doing this analysis on every piece of content. What’s important are to pick those that represent significant *categories* or characteristics of content: especially popular content, especially UNpopular content, a few places in the middle. It’s about watching trends and correlative tendencies, not about obsessing over every minute and granular stat.
After all, the point of measuring is to understand how to ACT: stay the course, or change something. You don’t need every point on a graph to see which way the line is trending. So too with content mapping. It’s not worthwhile to track every asset, but rather to look at aggregate asset buckets over time, and spot the trends and patterns.
It’s time consuming to build initially, but once you have a system in place, it can actually become a rather fluid process.
Hi Amber, this post is a great resource for anyone who needs to justify their blog & content marketing ROI. As an individual blogger though, what's the 1-3 things that you watch to keep track of a blog's success?
This is an extremely valuable post. I love how you've not only presented some stats but have been so stinkin' thorough in your presentation! And you're right, it's more about building a community of folks who hang around than just getting clicks.
Great post! I just had this discussion with my coworkers about our blog's reach, and how we can potentially measure that as a means of better understanding our clients needs and the way they process information. You've got me thinking about a lot; thanks much!
Great post! I just had this discussion with my coworkers about our blog's reach, and how we can potentially measure that as a means of better understanding our clients needs and the way they process information. You've got me thinking about a lot; thanks much!
Totally awesome – quantitative and qualitative analysis. Great for making the case of being the source of compelling content, which you clearly are! What a rock-star!!!!
Totally awesome – quantitative and qualitative analysis. Great for making the case of being the source of compelling content, which you clearly are! What a rock-star!!!!
Stretch marks massage, Massage for stretch marks.
Just about everyone who says massage works is using it in tandem with nourishing lotions or regenerative serums or a suctioning kind of process. Most of them say massage must be used in conjunction with their other doctor-free treatments, but a few people insist that massage is the core, and must be administered strategically.
http://stretchmarkinstitute.com/14,is-massage-h…
this is agreat blog
DeLonghi’s a pretty well-trusted brand – and with good reason! Their products usually work really well, whether they are heaters, dehumidifiers, or portable air conditioners. So this week, I’ve decided to take a look at the PAC-A120E 3-in-1 portable AC and see if it’s as great as the rest of DeLonghi’s other products.