I wasn’t going to blog about the Motrin fiasco, because I thought all of the points had been covered, really, and I didn’t have much else to say other than “me too” or “that’s interesting“. But what’s been festering with me is the idea that the lynch mob came out en force, and among the angriness, there were precious few level-headed solutions that were offered or positive perspectives to be had.
Companies cannot learn how to immerse themselves in social media unless they have guideposts. Real solutions. Real concepts that tie back to their business, and that they can implement in their existing framework.
And mistakes happen. Ill-conceived ads will get run, someone will leak insider information, bad judgment will prevail. So when we’re finished bludgeoning a company with a sledgehammer over how they’ve wronged their community, how do we help them to build on that learning?
If our answer to every social media or marketing misstep is to shred the companies who have screwed up, what incentive do they have to believe us social media types when we tell them that there’s brand building potential in transparency? How do we ensure that we haven’t made them think that social media is a snake pit just waiting to devour them? They’ve just stuck their head out and gotten it lopped off.
So let’s find a few positives, shall we, and focus on some outcomes and solutions?
The Twitter Community Has A Significant Voice
Twitter was once merely a niche, geek-infested (yes, me too) site with little mainstream application. But today, a big connection was made between a Big Brand and this little (?) universe for which so many of us are evangelists.
This is GOOD for showing the potential of this medium for distributing a message, or at the very least, for listening to it. If we can now take that learning and translate it into how we can also transmit positive, valuable messages, that’d be even better.
So for a bit of Twitter Done Right, a Success Story: A smaller brand learning to use Twitter for business results.
Transparency Isn’t Always Easy.
In this particular instance, the pharmaceutical industry has very particular regulations about adverse events reporting, and it makes it more challenging for them to engage directly with customers. Am I suggesting that they shouldn’t? No. (There were probably other channels available to them that they probably should have taken advantage of – would love to hear your suggestions). But it behooves us all to understand the vertical in which we’re dealing so that the implications for transparent communications are fully understood.
While many of us have the most altruistic aspirations regarding social media’s potential, this has opened our eyes to the possibility that not every business can embrace it the same way.(If you disagree with the regulation in the first place, that’s not social media’s fault. Try the government.)
For a success story of overcoming transparency barriers: Listen to what Lego did.
Listening Is Important (And Expectations are High)
Monitoring and stewarding your brand are critically important anywhere, and even moreso now in the fast-moving social flash flood. The Motrin folks got skewered for not hearing the conversation the instant it caught fire on a Saturday morning (it took them about 18 hours to respond). The positive here is that setting up listening posts isn’t too complicated – there are lots of free and paid tools (disclosure: client) that can help with that.
Also, it raises awareness for the need for the human factor in listening (since the tools can’t decide what to do with that information once they have it). On the other hand, how the response is handled is often as important as how quickly it’s disseminated. So we can learn from this that listening applies not just to your social media efforts, but to your overall branding and marketing. It’s what facilitates you as a business being able to make a level-headed, intelligent response once you’ve taken stock and considered the feedback you’ve gathered.
There’s More Than One Lens Through Which To Look
Many of us were speculating about whether or not Motrin did any testing of these ads before sending them off into the big wide world. To be fair, not everyone was offended by it (I thought it was a little flip, but not tragic. And I’m a mom).
I’d be interested to know what if any kind of focus group work or testing or feedback they got on the ad before they ran it. It’s entirely possible that the audience they tapped thought it was great. Whether that included a bunch of moms or just their internal group and their agency remains to be seen.
What it shows me, though, is that we need to carefully point out to companies that it’s important to consider their brand through eyes other than their own (or those on their payrolls). We’ve said it before, we’ll say it again. Brands are defined by the customers, not the businesses. But there’s no such thing as a unanimous home run, and that’s ok. You do your research, you test, you ask for as much feedback as you reasonably can, and you go.
Apologies Amidst Crisis Can Make a Difference.
Saying you’re sorry and that you’ve heard the uproar is a good thing. You can change your tune, say you’re sorry you screwed up, and move on.
Success story: Nike admitted their gaffe with the Nike Women’s Marathon and earned some respect for it. And by now, you know what Comcast has been doing to admit their shortcomings and fix problems on the fly. Network Solutions has been successfully stemming a negative tide through genuine, authentic outreach.
I’d really hate for something like poorly worded website and print ads to be a fear-mongering exercise that forces more companies to stick their heads in the sand in hopes that the SM firestorm never shows up on their doorstep. I do sure hope we continue to educate companies about the right ways to participate in this space.
But I for one would like to do so by shining some light on the positives, the learnings and outcomes (even from the missteps), and real solutions that companies can employ. If companies are truly not ready to talk to their customers, how do we keep from proving to them that all of their fears are real? In our quest to demonstrate that our voices are legitimate, can we also show that we know how to elevate the tide for everyone?
What do you have to say?
Photo credit: jvh33
Great post, Amber! Additionally, I think when a company does respond after a gaffe, and is ready to learn, we need to reward them with support (not continue to beat them up, as many are doing with Motrin still). That will encourage other companies to engage, and create positive case studies, not just more scare stories.
Barb Gibsons last blog post..Wake-up call for communicators not yet tuned in to social media
Great post, Amber! Additionally, I think when a company does respond after a gaffe, and is ready to learn, we need to reward them with support (not continue to beat them up, as many are doing with Motrin still). That will encourage other companies to engage, and create positive case studies, not just more scare stories.
Barb Gibsons last blog post..Wake-up call for communicators not yet tuned in to social media
Ok I’m going to start this by saying that I totally get what you are saying about rushing in and slamming cos that make their first mistakes with social media.
And I remember leaving a VERY similar post to this in 2006 when a flood of bloggers slammed Dell for launching it’s One2One blog. Bloggers had been slamming Dell for NOT blogging after Dell Hell, then when Dell finally did launch a blog, many of those same bloggers then slammed Dell for a supposedly weak first blogging effort. IOW, they were slamming Dell for listening to them, it seemed.
But…that was 2006. And at some point, I wonder if we still should be ‘cutting slack’ to companies that still aren’t aware of social media and the conversations that their customers are having online? Does the ‘free pass’ for a ‘first time offender’ have an expiration date?
In total, I say we should err on the side of caution, and follow your advice to be careful about scaring companies off by coming down on them too hard for their first missteps. But at the same time, companies need to start making moves to familiarize themselves with where their customers are online, and how to engage and interact with them.
These are still the early days of companies interacting with their customers via social tools, but that won’t be the case much longer.
mack colliers last blog post..#Motrinmoms = Exhibit A for online monitoring
Ok I’m going to start this by saying that I totally get what you are saying about rushing in and slamming cos that make their first mistakes with social media.
And I remember leaving a VERY similar post to this in 2006 when a flood of bloggers slammed Dell for launching it’s One2One blog. Bloggers had been slamming Dell for NOT blogging after Dell Hell, then when Dell finally did launch a blog, many of those same bloggers then slammed Dell for a supposedly weak first blogging effort. IOW, they were slamming Dell for listening to them, it seemed.
But…that was 2006. And at some point, I wonder if we still should be ‘cutting slack’ to companies that still aren’t aware of social media and the conversations that their customers are having online? Does the ‘free pass’ for a ‘first time offender’ have an expiration date?
In total, I say we should err on the side of caution, and follow your advice to be careful about scaring companies off by coming down on them too hard for their first missteps. But at the same time, companies need to start making moves to familiarize themselves with where their customers are online, and how to engage and interact with them.
These are still the early days of companies interacting with their customers via social tools, but that won’t be the case much longer.
mack colliers last blog post..#Motrinmoms = Exhibit A for online monitoring
@Mack, I’m not suggesting we cut them “slack”. I’m suggesting that we resist the urge to make everything into a drama fest. Last night’s Twitter debacle was fraught with knee-jerk, reactionary piling on, and that wasn’t solving anything.
As for being aware, I’d say that it’s not accurate to say that Motrin wasn’t listening. Did they have listening posts set up? Maybe, maybe not. They responded within 24 hours, which in my book, is WAY better than many companies accomplish. They DID listen, and they took action as a result. What more do we want?
Whether or not it’s early, we as the social media stewards have an obligation to be the builders, not those who tear down. So my answer is that we need to continue calling out the companies that screw it up, but we also need to be using that opportunity to constructively educate and change the environment, not just act like a bunch of know-it-alls who have it all figured out. I think there’s absolutely reason to point out missteps, but I just don’t think we can stop there and call our job done.
“I’d really hate for something like poorly worded website and print ads to be a fear-mongering exercise that forces more companies to stick their heads in the sand in hopes that the SM firestorm never shows up on their doorstep.”
Sorry, your fear is already a reality.
In a brave media/liberal town like NYC…my colleagues are now scared. Can we blame them? And if we do, are we being objective and, um, engaging them into a community?
Yes, everyone has a right to be upset/not upset by this ad. And I love everyone getting a voice (I rage against companies that supress voices)! But in reading the NYT/MSM, companies are now scared to engage in SM, not excited.
And I had to promise 3 colleagues that I would NOT reference them personally in my comment here. WHY? Because they are actually scared to engage for fear of hate mail to their co’s or them personally. Sigh ;-(
CKs last blog post..Yup, I’m voting Obama…
“I’d really hate for something like poorly worded website and print ads to be a fear-mongering exercise that forces more companies to stick their heads in the sand in hopes that the SM firestorm never shows up on their doorstep.”
Sorry, your fear is already a reality.
In a brave media/liberal town like NYC…my colleagues are now scared. Can we blame them? And if we do, are we being objective and, um, engaging them into a community?
Yes, everyone has a right to be upset/not upset by this ad. And I love everyone getting a voice (I rage against companies that supress voices)! But in reading the NYT/MSM, companies are now scared to engage in SM, not excited.
And I had to promise 3 colleagues that I would NOT reference them personally in my comment here. WHY? Because they are actually scared to engage for fear of hate mail to their co’s or them personally. Sigh ;-(
CKs last blog post..Yup, I’m voting Obama…
Great points here Amber.
I was honestly getting a headache (no pun intended) with all the Motrin talk but looking into these positives are great. I think for a lot of us within the proverbial ‘echo chamber’, are quick to jump on a company who isn’t ‘doing it right’. Sure, we get it but some truly don’t and allowing them to understand how to, with some of these points you’ve made, is a step in the right and positive direction.
Sonny Gills last blog post..Unwrapping A Gift For You
Great points here Amber.
I was honestly getting a headache (no pun intended) with all the Motrin talk but looking into these positives are great. I think for a lot of us within the proverbial ‘echo chamber’, are quick to jump on a company who isn’t ‘doing it right’. Sure, we get it but some truly don’t and allowing them to understand how to, with some of these points you’ve made, is a step in the right and positive direction.
Sonny Gills last blog post..Unwrapping A Gift For You
ok,
so – this is going to sound corny, but you have the same thought process i had this morning. i thought all was said and done, and i was sad to see that there seemed to be no positive coming of this. i was actually going to blog on the “twitter mafia”, (yeah, it sounds horrible) and how the bullying of motrin led them to learn something very quickly that i am not sure were even aware of.
i do believe there is a value to social media, but it should be to pile no (in this case) motrin to force them to “deal with their errors”. i think that there was sufficient brain power behind the “lynch mob” mentality to actually propose some good ideas and solutions instead of pointing them to where they were wrong. i like what mack collier said – paraphrasing – you cannot be darn if you do and darn if you don’t.
bl: nice blog, took my thoughts and wrote them better than i could have – then again, it will happen again.
esteban kolskys last blog post..Customer Service is Dead — Long Live Community Service!
ok,
so – this is going to sound corny, but you have the same thought process i had this morning. i thought all was said and done, and i was sad to see that there seemed to be no positive coming of this. i was actually going to blog on the “twitter mafia”, (yeah, it sounds horrible) and how the bullying of motrin led them to learn something very quickly that i am not sure were even aware of.
i do believe there is a value to social media, but it should be to pile no (in this case) motrin to force them to “deal with their errors”. i think that there was sufficient brain power behind the “lynch mob” mentality to actually propose some good ideas and solutions instead of pointing them to where they were wrong. i like what mack collier said – paraphrasing – you cannot be darn if you do and darn if you don’t.
bl: nice blog, took my thoughts and wrote them better than i could have – then again, it will happen again.
esteban kolskys last blog post..Customer Service is Dead — Long Live Community Service!
Good Post and dead on as usual. I’m kind of torn on the testing issue – on one hand I do testing ALL the time to prevent disasters such as this one; it’s smart marketing.
But on the other I know that you can’t wait until everyone signs off on advertising before you run with it. Some of the greatest ads in history had been over the strident objections of detractors.
Ultimately, it’s always going to come down to a marketer’s call as to whether it’s a message they want to be identified with – is it one that is consistent with what they want their brand to be?
And hell yeah, let’s NOT scare away the ones that are sticking their toe in the SM water.
Frank Martins last blog post..So…What IS Marketing?
Good Post and dead on as usual. I’m kind of torn on the testing issue – on one hand I do testing ALL the time to prevent disasters such as this one; it’s smart marketing.
But on the other I know that you can’t wait until everyone signs off on advertising before you run with it. Some of the greatest ads in history had been over the strident objections of detractors.
Ultimately, it’s always going to come down to a marketer’s call as to whether it’s a message they want to be identified with – is it one that is consistent with what they want their brand to be?
And hell yeah, let’s NOT scare away the ones that are sticking their toe in the SM water.
Frank Martins last blog post..So…What IS Marketing?
Amber I’m basing my guess that they weren’t listening on the fact that their agency was apparently contacted yesterday for a response to the backlash on Twitter, and they had no idea what the blogger was talking about. As David Griner said at AdFreak, if you are going to launch a new ad on Saturday, you might want to monitor online reaction then, and not wait till Monday.
BTW let me be clear; their responding by yanking the ad and putting an apology on the site was a damned good response, and pretty darned timely. IMO that all but killed the chance of anyone other than mommy bloggers and Twitter power users even remembering this 24 hours from now.
And I agree with you and others that have said that solutions should be offered by the people that are doing the criticizing. Of course, Motrin can’t take advantage of those solutions, if they aren’t listening. My solution, which I’ve stated on my blog and Twitter, is to start monitoring now as an ongoing process. And start finding ways (as pharma regs allow) to reach out to and interact with the mommy bloggers that took offense to the ad. Listening to and engaging a detractor is often the quickest way to convert them into an evangelist for your brand.
Hopefully this will be a wake-up call for Motrin, and they will start listening to the conversations happening online. And I also agree with you on how bloggers/Twitterers can sometimes make a ‘drama’ out of episodes such as this. A great way for companies to avoid this, is to interact with their online customers.
We’ll see what happens from here.
mack colliers last blog post..#Motrinmoms = Exhibit A for online monitoring
Amber I’m basing my guess that they weren’t listening on the fact that their agency was apparently contacted yesterday for a response to the backlash on Twitter, and they had no idea what the blogger was talking about. As David Griner said at AdFreak, if you are going to launch a new ad on Saturday, you might want to monitor online reaction then, and not wait till Monday.
BTW let me be clear; their responding by yanking the ad and putting an apology on the site was a damned good response, and pretty darned timely. IMO that all but killed the chance of anyone other than mommy bloggers and Twitter power users even remembering this 24 hours from now.
And I agree with you and others that have said that solutions should be offered by the people that are doing the criticizing. Of course, Motrin can’t take advantage of those solutions, if they aren’t listening. My solution, which I’ve stated on my blog and Twitter, is to start monitoring now as an ongoing process. And start finding ways (as pharma regs allow) to reach out to and interact with the mommy bloggers that took offense to the ad. Listening to and engaging a detractor is often the quickest way to convert them into an evangelist for your brand.
Hopefully this will be a wake-up call for Motrin, and they will start listening to the conversations happening online. And I also agree with you on how bloggers/Twitterers can sometimes make a ‘drama’ out of episodes such as this. A great way for companies to avoid this, is to interact with their online customers.
We’ll see what happens from here.
mack colliers last blog post..#Motrinmoms = Exhibit A for online monitoring
mack,
you bring a good point – which i raised earlier via twitter. is this a real issue if it is just confined to twitter-sphere?
i think that we can call twitter and blogs a catalyst for change, or a mainstream media, when we see issues like this jumping from one medium into others.
just 1.5 more cents
esteban kolskys last blog post..Customer Service is Dead — Long Live Community Service!
mack,
you bring a good point – which i raised earlier via twitter. is this a real issue if it is just confined to twitter-sphere?
i think that we can call twitter and blogs a catalyst for change, or a mainstream media, when we see issues like this jumping from one medium into others.
just 1.5 more cents
esteban kolskys last blog post..Customer Service is Dead — Long Live Community Service!
It was interesting watching this from afar. What will be even more interesting is “what happens next”. Sure there was good and bad in this episode, but until we see where Motrin go next, it will be hard to see the real benefits/costs to their brand.
If they are smart they will turn it around quicksmart and use this as a platform to explore and engage with their communities. Well, we can all dream, can’t we 😉
Gavin Heatons last blog post..Mainstreaming Social Media
It was interesting watching this from afar. What will be even more interesting is “what happens next”. Sure there was good and bad in this episode, but until we see where Motrin go next, it will be hard to see the real benefits/costs to their brand.
If they are smart they will turn it around quicksmart and use this as a platform to explore and engage with their communities. Well, we can all dream, can’t we 😉
Gavin Heatons last blog post..Mainstreaming Social Media
@esteban, regarding this being a ‘real’ issue if confined to Twitter, I say yes and no. It’s a real issue because it’s a subset of Motrin’s current and potential customers that were upset by the ad.
But on the flipside, that outrage seems to be pretty much confined to Twitter and the mommy blogger community. Now if that had spilled over to the mainstream and then a large portion of Motrin’s customers became outraged, THEN it’s a major issue. But that likely won’t happen, and Motrin’s pulling the ad and apologizing is a huge reason why.
mack colliers last blog post..#Motrinmoms = Exhibit A for online monitoring
@esteban, regarding this being a ‘real’ issue if confined to Twitter, I say yes and no. It’s a real issue because it’s a subset of Motrin’s current and potential customers that were upset by the ad.
But on the flipside, that outrage seems to be pretty much confined to Twitter and the mommy blogger community. Now if that had spilled over to the mainstream and then a large portion of Motrin’s customers became outraged, THEN it’s a major issue. But that likely won’t happen, and Motrin’s pulling the ad and apologizing is a huge reason why.
mack colliers last blog post..#Motrinmoms = Exhibit A for online monitoring
You make some great points, and it’s interesting to read all of the different opinions that have emerged after the lynch mob died down.
I agree that it was a wave that many people got caught up in, and that we as the social media early adopters (because let’s face it, most of social media is still in its early adopter phase) need to be proactive rather than reactive if brands are going to get involved and participate. If we unleash the hounds at every misstep, brands are simply going to avoid social media all together rather than embrace it like we all want them to.
Motrin definitely made a few mistakes, but I think their biggest mistake was not being prepared for any kind of backlash. They launched the campaign on the weekend, and didn’t have any kind of Twitter search or media alerts in place to alert them as soon as things turned sour. Had they been prepared, this could have easily turned this into a positive event as they would have been the personal and proactive brand that companies like Comcast have become despite the negative press that they often receive.
Let’s just hope that there are plenty of lessons learned form this event, and that brands don’t shy away from social media, but instead use this as an example of just how powerful that social media message can be.
Cory O’Briens last blog post..Surf Report Puts Oakley In Surfers’ Hands
You make some great points, and it’s interesting to read all of the different opinions that have emerged after the lynch mob died down.
I agree that it was a wave that many people got caught up in, and that we as the social media early adopters (because let’s face it, most of social media is still in its early adopter phase) need to be proactive rather than reactive if brands are going to get involved and participate. If we unleash the hounds at every misstep, brands are simply going to avoid social media all together rather than embrace it like we all want them to.
Motrin definitely made a few mistakes, but I think their biggest mistake was not being prepared for any kind of backlash. They launched the campaign on the weekend, and didn’t have any kind of Twitter search or media alerts in place to alert them as soon as things turned sour. Had they been prepared, this could have easily turned this into a positive event as they would have been the personal and proactive brand that companies like Comcast have become despite the negative press that they often receive.
Let’s just hope that there are plenty of lessons learned form this event, and that brands don’t shy away from social media, but instead use this as an example of just how powerful that social media message can be.
Cory O’Briens last blog post..Surf Report Puts Oakley In Surfers’ Hands
@Mack Collier – Both the New York Times and Forbes covered it in their blogs, so I’d say it got pretty far into the mainstream media. It’s definitely not going to be on every news station this evening or newspaper headline tomorrow morning, but more than just the Twitter users and mommy bloggers are now aware of what happened.
Cory O’Briens last blog post..Surf Report Puts Oakley In Surfers’ Hands
@Mack Collier – Both the New York Times and Forbes covered it in their blogs, so I’d say it got pretty far into the mainstream media. It’s definitely not going to be on every news station this evening or newspaper headline tomorrow morning, but more than just the Twitter users and mommy bloggers are now aware of what happened.
Cory O’Briens last blog post..Surf Report Puts Oakley In Surfers’ Hands
@cory,
allow me to disagree. it reached their blogs – not the mainstream media. if this would have been on tv or newpapers or magazines (still don’t know about that one) then it would have jumped. as it stands, it was kept in the ether where we all live. again, 5MM people in twitter, 12+MM reading blogs… there are 300MM people in this country, 180MM or so that would be affected by a motrin problem or issue… did it really become a serious problem?
esteban kolskys last blog post..Customer Service is Dead — Long Live Community Service!
@cory,
allow me to disagree. it reached their blogs – not the mainstream media. if this would have been on tv or newpapers or magazines (still don’t know about that one) then it would have jumped. as it stands, it was kept in the ether where we all live. again, 5MM people in twitter, 12+MM reading blogs… there are 300MM people in this country, 180MM or so that would be affected by a motrin problem or issue… did it really become a serious problem?
esteban kolskys last blog post..Customer Service is Dead — Long Live Community Service!
First time here. Great site and spot-on post. I wrote a post on the same topic that ended by looking for resolution as well. It’s all in how they handle it. I agree that brands that respond well to consumer feedback or marketing fiascos can come back stronger and more respected in the market place. That Motrin just got a boatload of publicity, albeit negative, gives them an opportunity while in the spotlight—while lots of moms are watching—to make it right.
jyl_mommygossips last blog post..A Pain No Motrin Can Cure!
First time here. Great site and spot-on post. I wrote a post on the same topic that ended by looking for resolution as well. It’s all in how they handle it. I agree that brands that respond well to consumer feedback or marketing fiascos can come back stronger and more respected in the market place. That Motrin just got a boatload of publicity, albeit negative, gives them an opportunity while in the spotlight—while lots of moms are watching—to make it right.
jyl_mommygossips last blog post..A Pain No Motrin Can Cure!
I completely agree with you Amber. Particularly on this point: “How do we ensure that we haven’t made [companies] think that social media is a snake pit just waiting to devour them?”
If social media is truly about opening up a conversation and a dialogue, don’t we as consumers also need to let the company respond and give ‘them’ a chance?
Leslie Bankss last blog post..golden ginko leaves
I completely agree with you Amber. Particularly on this point: “How do we ensure that we haven’t made [companies] think that social media is a snake pit just waiting to devour them?”
If social media is truly about opening up a conversation and a dialogue, don’t we as consumers also need to let the company respond and give ‘them’ a chance?
Leslie Bankss last blog post..golden ginko leaves
Great post Amber, got me thinking about the people behind the stuff-ups as opposed to just the online community. Thought provoking, thanks for sharing 🙂
Belinda Leskiws last blog post..Six Tips to Succeed in Social Media
Great post Amber, got me thinking about the people behind the stuff-ups as opposed to just the online community. Thought provoking, thanks for sharing 🙂
Belinda Leskiws last blog post..Six Tips to Succeed in Social Media
Amber you’re right – there was a lot of drama her and there didn’t have to be. The lesson here is companies need to be aware of what’s being said out there. They need to monitor the ‘Net and have people in place that understand social media and how to harness it. As the old saying goes, be there or be talked about…
Amber you’re right – there was a lot of drama her and there didn’t have to be. The lesson here is companies need to be aware of what’s being said out there. They need to monitor the ‘Net and have people in place that understand social media and how to harness it. As the old saying goes, be there or be talked about…
I’m going out on a limb here with some thoughts on the issue that are actually more shallow…(dismiss me if you will)
What is the likelihood that the powers that be at Motrin and the agency never anticipated their new campaign was “viral-worthy” (Seinfeld fans may equate with Elaine’s judicious scrutiny of her suitors). I mean, what if the campaign–at least at *this* nubile stage in the execution of their plan–two days out of the gate was merely the print ad and release of the spot? It’s like Motrin just now decided to date, and already the candidate pool expects them to have determined their intentions and retirement planning…
I’ll concur that it seems short-sighted of the brand (and most certainly their partner, IMO)not to have constructed at least a parachute plan for this campaign. And that’s giving them a “pass” for not considering (at least at launch) powerful channels with which to reach their consumers and instead relying on comfortable, traditional ground. Have they been in a cave? Moms + Babies = highly debatable and sensitive topics. Duh.
As you suggest, Amber, NEW (or new-ish) can be scary. Intimidating. At many companies have yet to intentionally, purposefully write rules of engagement for public, permanent, continuing communication with their consumers (social media). While for lack of rules I personally construct my own, its certainly feasible that to do so in larger companies carries a great deal more risk.
My employer’s client base is entirely healthcare, and ironically the majority is very interested in learning what all the SM fuss is about. There are several large respected brands building HC conversations already.
PS–I’m a mother of three and while I found some of the messaging flip and certainly trivializing and stereotypical, I didn’t interpret Motrin as suggesting babies and their gear are tools for defining womens roles. I think they were trying to be hip, and managed to silence the room the old fashioned way–with poor taste.
PPS, the number of comments to this post is as intimidating as it is encouraging. How can this comment add dimension and value to what others have already discussed? Conversely, how great it is that a slew of smart and insightful want to think through a problem together?! Whether or not Motrin learns from this, I’ll bet a whole lot of Twitterers and bloggers (marketers) will!
Sorry for the rants!
Heather Rasts last blog post..Authenticity in Social Media
I’m going out on a limb here with some thoughts on the issue that are actually more shallow…(dismiss me if you will)
What is the likelihood that the powers that be at Motrin and the agency never anticipated their new campaign was “viral-worthy” (Seinfeld fans may equate with Elaine’s judicious scrutiny of her suitors). I mean, what if the campaign–at least at *this* nubile stage in the execution of their plan–two days out of the gate was merely the print ad and release of the spot? It’s like Motrin just now decided to date, and already the candidate pool expects them to have determined their intentions and retirement planning…
I’ll concur that it seems short-sighted of the brand (and most certainly their partner, IMO)not to have constructed at least a parachute plan for this campaign. And that’s giving them a “pass” for not considering (at least at launch) powerful channels with which to reach their consumers and instead relying on comfortable, traditional ground. Have they been in a cave? Moms + Babies = highly debatable and sensitive topics. Duh.
As you suggest, Amber, NEW (or new-ish) can be scary. Intimidating. At many companies have yet to intentionally, purposefully write rules of engagement for public, permanent, continuing communication with their consumers (social media). While for lack of rules I personally construct my own, its certainly feasible that to do so in larger companies carries a great deal more risk.
My employer’s client base is entirely healthcare, and ironically the majority is very interested in learning what all the SM fuss is about. There are several large respected brands building HC conversations already.
PS–I’m a mother of three and while I found some of the messaging flip and certainly trivializing and stereotypical, I didn’t interpret Motrin as suggesting babies and their gear are tools for defining womens roles. I think they were trying to be hip, and managed to silence the room the old fashioned way–with poor taste.
PPS, the number of comments to this post is as intimidating as it is encouraging. How can this comment add dimension and value to what others have already discussed? Conversely, how great it is that a slew of smart and insightful want to think through a problem together?! Whether or not Motrin learns from this, I’ll bet a whole lot of Twitterers and bloggers (marketers) will!
Sorry for the rants!
Heather Rasts last blog post..Authenticity in Social Media
Amber, a great post and a ton of great conversation. Here’s the thing…this was a traditional marketing campaign, not a social media endeavor. The backlash and flurry of conversation was all via Web 2.0 tools used by folks, like us, who live in that world. The amount of people who saw the Twitter reaction and posts by bloggers is probably minimal in comparison to the actual public that saw the TV spot or print ad. And, I’d venture a guess that there are some moms out there who saw the ad and thought “finally, someone who understands the pain those dreaded contraptions can cause!” My point is that I doubt this situation will stop companies from continually making traditional marketing snafus (unfortunately, they are too embedded in a lot of corporate cultures) or fear their next marketing campaign. The difference these days is they will be called to the carpet for making them (to Mack’s point). Is that right? No, of course not. Especially when, like you pointed out, the criticism is not constructive. The next step Motrin should take is to analyze what happened and figure out how to ‘listen’ to the market moving forward. Baby steps, not fear…that’s all that’s needed.
Beth Hartes last blog post..“All right, Mr. DeMille, I’m ready for my close-up” (Lessons Learned from a First Time Video Blog)
Amber, a great post and a ton of great conversation. Here’s the thing…this was a traditional marketing campaign, not a social media endeavor. The backlash and flurry of conversation was all via Web 2.0 tools used by folks, like us, who live in that world. The amount of people who saw the Twitter reaction and posts by bloggers is probably minimal in comparison to the actual public that saw the TV spot or print ad. And, I’d venture a guess that there are some moms out there who saw the ad and thought “finally, someone who understands the pain those dreaded contraptions can cause!” My point is that I doubt this situation will stop companies from continually making traditional marketing snafus (unfortunately, they are too embedded in a lot of corporate cultures) or fear their next marketing campaign. The difference these days is they will be called to the carpet for making them (to Mack’s point). Is that right? No, of course not. Especially when, like you pointed out, the criticism is not constructive. The next step Motrin should take is to analyze what happened and figure out how to ‘listen’ to the market moving forward. Baby steps, not fear…that’s all that’s needed.
Beth Hartes last blog post..“All right, Mr. DeMille, I’m ready for my close-up” (Lessons Learned from a First Time Video Blog)
Mack, your question: “Does the ‘free pass’ for a ‘first time offender’ have an expiration date?”
I think the expiration date is when the norms within the majority of companies and people change to accept social media and personal outreach as what companies are supposed to do. We aren’t there yet.
We both know that social media is still fairly new. If this were a norm that every company knew about, I’d be a little more upset that they violated the norms.
But this storm of drama surrounding the ad isn’t going to convince other companies that it’s safe out here. To be personal and right now reaching those companies is important.
I saw the ad. I didn’t think it was particularly insensitive. I do realize it could make mom’s upset. I would have advised against releasing it.
Amber, thanks for writing a level-headed positive advice post for the folks at Motrin. Hopefully this won’t scare other companies away for fear of getting their heads lopped off.
Michelle / chelpixies last blog post..Biography ? destiny
Mack, your question: “Does the ‘free pass’ for a ‘first time offender’ have an expiration date?”
I think the expiration date is when the norms within the majority of companies and people change to accept social media and personal outreach as what companies are supposed to do. We aren’t there yet.
We both know that social media is still fairly new. If this were a norm that every company knew about, I’d be a little more upset that they violated the norms.
But this storm of drama surrounding the ad isn’t going to convince other companies that it’s safe out here. To be personal and right now reaching those companies is important.
I saw the ad. I didn’t think it was particularly insensitive. I do realize it could make mom’s upset. I would have advised against releasing it.
Amber, thanks for writing a level-headed positive advice post for the folks at Motrin. Hopefully this won’t scare other companies away for fear of getting their heads lopped off.
Michelle / chelpixies last blog post..Biography ? destiny
As usual Amber. Great post. Thanks.
Jack Hadleys last blog post..What’s in a name?
As usual Amber. Great post. Thanks.
Jack Hadleys last blog post..What’s in a name?
Nice post Amber.
I see a few things happening here, none of them particularly positive:
1. BACKLASH: As more and more moms (like yourself, for that matter) are speaking up and saying “they might have worded it differently, but you know, it wasn’t that big a deal” the buzz is growing that a mountain was made out of a mole hill and that the mountaineers had no small degree of self-interest in mind.
2. OVERREACTION: This was not the release of a multi-million dollar national campaign. It was an ad that Motrin and their agency assumed would induce a small chuckle and that any flack could be dealt with on Monday. Yet to hear the Social Media Gurus crow on about it, they should have had a dozen people monitoring everything from Twitter to Orkut as if this was a space launch or something. What’s forgotten is that people cost money. As in salaries paid. And that unless they had a very good reason to believe the spots would be controversial, there was no need to spend “all weekend monitoring it.” They responded in 24 hours as it was. But to hear certain of our peers yammer on, they should have been sending gift baskets to everyone who issued a negative tweet about the ad.
3. POOR RESEARCH – A little digging and I figured out why this was such a hot button issue. And I’m not that smart. It seems that the idea of babywearing is a major tenet of a parenting philosophy called Attachment Parenting. Many people regard this philosophy as fringe, at best (you can Google it to learn more). But babywearing has recently become trendy with families who have never even heard of attachment parenting. For those who believe in the value of attachment parenting, babywearing is not a silly fashion trend- it’s a core belief, and so they are understandably upset when people (and advertisers) refer to it as a fashion trend and not a key part of a child rearing philosophy. Someone should have known this.
BOTTOM LINE: We’re all still learning how to do this– clients and their advisors. The takeaway from this is that social media makes it much easier for protesters to come together quickly and make their voices heard. And that social media happens whether you want it to or not.
(I may cut and paste this as my own blog post later. Just so you know;) )
Alan Wolks last blog post..Did Motrin Suffer From NASCAR Blindness?
Nice post Amber.
I see a few things happening here, none of them particularly positive:
1. BACKLASH: As more and more moms (like yourself, for that matter) are speaking up and saying “they might have worded it differently, but you know, it wasn’t that big a deal” the buzz is growing that a mountain was made out of a mole hill and that the mountaineers had no small degree of self-interest in mind.
2. OVERREACTION: This was not the release of a multi-million dollar national campaign. It was an ad that Motrin and their agency assumed would induce a small chuckle and that any flack could be dealt with on Monday. Yet to hear the Social Media Gurus crow on about it, they should have had a dozen people monitoring everything from Twitter to Orkut as if this was a space launch or something. What’s forgotten is that people cost money. As in salaries paid. And that unless they had a very good reason to believe the spots would be controversial, there was no need to spend “all weekend monitoring it.” They responded in 24 hours as it was. But to hear certain of our peers yammer on, they should have been sending gift baskets to everyone who issued a negative tweet about the ad.
3. POOR RESEARCH – A little digging and I figured out why this was such a hot button issue. And I’m not that smart. It seems that the idea of babywearing is a major tenet of a parenting philosophy called Attachment Parenting. Many people regard this philosophy as fringe, at best (you can Google it to learn more). But babywearing has recently become trendy with families who have never even heard of attachment parenting. For those who believe in the value of attachment parenting, babywearing is not a silly fashion trend- it’s a core belief, and so they are understandably upset when people (and advertisers) refer to it as a fashion trend and not a key part of a child rearing philosophy. Someone should have known this.
BOTTOM LINE: We’re all still learning how to do this– clients and their advisors. The takeaway from this is that social media makes it much easier for protesters to come together quickly and make their voices heard. And that social media happens whether you want it to or not.
(I may cut and paste this as my own blog post later. Just so you know;) )
Alan Wolks last blog post..Did Motrin Suffer From NASCAR Blindness?
Great post about the Motrin Moms fiasco. I completely agree with you and even guest blogged about the idea of social media mob mentality at http://portagemedia.com/socialcommentary/ the idea that we may be scaring off corporate America is not good.
Thanks for sharing your insights!
Beverly Cornells last blog post..Help UNICEF and Complete Our Survey
Great post about the Motrin Moms fiasco. I completely agree with you and even guest blogged about the idea of social media mob mentality at http://portagemedia.com/socialcommentary/ the idea that we may be scaring off corporate America is not good.
Thanks for sharing your insights!
Beverly Cornells last blog post..Help UNICEF and Complete Our Survey