How many times have you asked this, or heard it asked?
Yes, but who OWNS social media? Is it marketing? PR? Customer service?
My answer? Yes.
You see, we’ve gotten so very matrixed and hierarchical in our approach to accountability and leadership (in everything, not just social media). We’ve told ourselves that something can’t possibly function unless we have one tie to tug, one person or role to point a finger at, one department with which to leave all the heavy lifting or all the glory (while giving ourselves the excuse that, well, that’s in their department).
Tomorrow’s successful and groundbreaking social businesses simply won’t see things that way.
The answers to how social applies inside our companies should never be one dimensional. Because social media isn’t vertical. It isn’t horizontal. It’s a business model that – if deployed well – permeates the very structure and practice of a business. It doesn’t just trickle down a spreadsheet into someone’s budget or list of accomplishments. It’s not a checklist.
But when it comes to management, hierarchies are cleaner. Excluding people by roles or functions is less messy, mostly because it requires less discussion. Parking social media in a singular box means that we somehow can understand and relate to it more familiarly. We can skip the hard work of weaving it throughout our enterprise. For if we label it as PR, we can therefore take the short road to the purpose, ownership, and even the measurements that PR has always implied. Right?
What a terrible waste that is.
The sustainable social organization will embrace the art of team-based innovation and leadership, and the collective accountability that goes along with it. They’ll build social media like a co-op. Driven by a team united voluntarily, toward common goals, and equally invested in the outcomes.
Collaboration is not just a feel-good buzzword. It’s the idea that our business is built more efficiently through shared knowledge, and shared responsibility. That multiple disciplines work together in order to see – from varied angles of expertise – how an organization works and can excel. What it’s challenges are. How to allocate resources, solve problems, innovate. Together.
The customers that we say we are trying to connect with do not care what our job description is or what department we work for. They care that we want to bring them inside the walls and make them a vital part of our business. No one department or discipline alone can accomplish that.
If you’re going to tell me you need to know which budget this fits in or whose strategic plan this falls under, I’m going to tell you all of them. It is your responsibility as a leader in your company to stop staring in the mirror when looking for how to achieve something greater, and start looking down the hallway. Across the aisle. Across the world. Check your ego at the door and realize that transformational ideas rarely have a singular source.
Find a team that cares enough to evaluate how and where social can make an impact. Let enthusiasm, curiosity, and passion be the criteria for participation, not rank and file. Put your plan together as a group, and hold each other accountable for progress. Build a cross-functional budget based on your objectives. Collectively outline your goals and divide and conquer the strategies intertwined areas of responsibility based on roles and expertise. Answer to your successes and failures as a team.
We’ve always wanted to feel like we all had a stake in our business’ success. We’ve all wanted to believe that our job description wasn’t what mattered, but our potential for innovation, cooperation, creativity, and execution on things that mattered. That we were all invested in the process, and that we’d reap the benefits together by watching our business grow.
It’s here. For all of us to do, collectively. The walls between us – internally and externally – have never mattered less. Shouldn’t we, once and for all, grasp the opportunity to show how team-based innovation wins?
Amber,
Thanks for your article and thoughts on social media ownership. Couldn’t agree with you more.
The best approach is for company execs to step back and consider their overall corporate agenda and objectives – for which social media will be a part.
The value of this approach is social media then becomes part of the company’s holistic strategy — and needs of all departments can be considered, whether SM will be used for customer-facing activities or internal collaboration.
It’s the best way to avoid the siloed effect. From here, the company can consider resource requirements and progressively drill into technology requirements to meet the overall corporate needs. It’s also the best way to select the right solution set(s).
Amber,
Thanks for your article and thoughts on social media ownership. Couldn’t agree with you more.
The best approach is for company execs to step back and consider their overall corporate agenda and objectives – for which social media will be a part.
The value of this approach is social media then becomes part of the company’s holistic strategy — and needs of all departments can be considered, whether SM will be used for customer-facing activities or internal collaboration.
It’s the best way to avoid the siloed effect. From here, the company can consider resource requirements and progressively drill into technology requirements to meet the overall corporate needs. It’s also the best way to select the right solution set(s).
Hi Amber,
Your article outlines some points that are important right now, but my guess is that in the near future this question will be as relevant as asking:
“Who owns telephone conversations?”
Organizations are still getting to grips with the whole phenomenon, but for many people social media already is what it is: a way of communication, a way of connecting.
That’s exactly it. At Radian6, we talk about it just like that – the social phone. And instead of treating it like some discipline, we need to treat it like a part of the business process, to deploy as warranted. Thanks for the comment. Spot on.
I agree. But as the telephone changed the way we did business so will social media.And the interaction of the company components internally and externally will shift the organization chart and change the business tactics and strategies. It’s like the engine: it brought a new tool and this tool changed the tactics of production and the way the organization did business.
The question will be
Who owns social media
-as a marketing channel?
-as a costumer service tool?
-as an internal communication tool?
-as a promotional tool?
-as a corporate social responsibility tool?
Everybody owns it as long as it makes sense to use it. And the response, customization, adaptation of products that users ask because of social media is what will drive an organizational change.
Hi Amber,
Your article outlines some points that are important right now, but my guess is that in the near future this question will be as relevant as asking:
“Who owns telephone conversations?”
Organizations are still getting to grips with the whole phenomenon, but for many people social media already is what it is: a way of communication, a way of connecting.
That’s exactly it. At Radian6, we talk about it just like that – the social phone. And instead of treating it like some discipline, we need to treat it like a part of the business process, to deploy as warranted. Thanks for the comment. Spot on.
I agree. But as the telephone changed the way we did business so will social media.And the interaction of the company components internally and externally will shift the organization chart and change the business tactics and strategies. It’s like the engine: it brought a new tool and this tool changed the tactics of production and the way the organization did business.
The question will be
Who owns social media
-as a marketing channel?
-as a costumer service tool?
-as an internal communication tool?
-as a promotional tool?
-as a corporate social responsibility tool?
Everybody owns it as long as it makes sense to use it. And the response, customization, adaptation of products that users ask because of social media is what will drive an organizational change.
Absolutely spot on .. as the English say. But I would add this dynamic is required for all innovation..not simply social. I recently developed an iphone app at my company where we ignored budgets, departments and roles, and worked together as a team. And it was clearly a success from a corporate perspective, as well as a personal perspective. We leveraged our passion, dedication and collaboration in a very agile, non waterfall approach, to create something new and unique. These days innovation rules. People who have spent their lives learning how things have always been done are suffering, while those who are discovering new ways to get things done are leading. These are amazing days, no?
Innovation is imperative, isn’t it? And that means we’re leading, not just following, so we don’t always have precedent to rely on. Teams can be great champions of each other, and wonderful internal checks and balances to get great ideas out in front.
Completely agree here – innovation is critical to survival, regardless of whether it is a new widget, or a new way of connecting with customers. At the risk of getting too philosophical, it seems that the structures that traditional businesses were built upon are now jeopardizing their ability to adapt to the rapidly changing reality of the market. The collaboration on the iPhone app described above is a great example of the future of successful business. The walls are coming down, like it or not.
Thanks for the great topic Amber!
Absolutely spot on .. as the English say. But I would add this dynamic is required for all innovation..not simply social. I recently developed an iphone app at my company where we ignored budgets, departments and roles, and worked together as a team. And it was clearly a success from a corporate perspective, as well as a personal perspective. We leveraged our passion, dedication and collaboration in a very agile, non waterfall approach, to create something new and unique. These days innovation rules. People who have spent their lives learning how things have always been done are suffering, while those who are discovering new ways to get things done are leading. These are amazing days, no?
Innovation is imperative, isn’t it? And that means we’re leading, not just following, so we don’t always have precedent to rely on. Teams can be great champions of each other, and wonderful internal checks and balances to get great ideas out in front.
Completely agree here – innovation is critical to survival, regardless of whether it is a new widget, or a new way of connecting with customers. At the risk of getting too philosophical, it seems that the structures that traditional businesses were built upon are now jeopardizing their ability to adapt to the rapidly changing reality of the market. The collaboration on the iPhone app described above is a great example of the future of successful business. The walls are coming down, like it or not.
Thanks for the great topic Amber!
Hey Amber, another great article. Thank you! I’m a software developer for a biotech company, which is maybe a non-traditional SM contribution role, but I’ve got a huge interest in it and know I could really help with my company’s efforts to that effect. Luckily, there seems so far to be some support for cross-functional participation, so I’m hopeful. I think the idea of bringing people to the table who actually care about the success of a particular goal regardless of their job description is so smart, but also fairly rare. Those hierarchies and messy accountability paths do get in the way. Here’s hoping that happens less and less, because it just seems like a win-win all around. Happy customers, more successful companies. No-brainer, right?
You’d think so! 🙂 Keep doing what you’re doing. Passion really goes a long way, and sooner or later, you’ll find the people that are ready to tap what you’ve got to offer.
Hey Amber, another great article. Thank you! I’m a software developer for a biotech company, which is maybe a non-traditional SM contribution role, but I’ve got a huge interest in it and know I could really help with my company’s efforts to that effect. Luckily, there seems so far to be some support for cross-functional participation, so I’m hopeful. I think the idea of bringing people to the table who actually care about the success of a particular goal regardless of their job description is so smart, but also fairly rare. Those hierarchies and messy accountability paths do get in the way. Here’s hoping that happens less and less, because it just seems like a win-win all around. Happy customers, more successful companies. No-brainer, right?
You’d think so! 🙂 Keep doing what you’re doing. Passion really goes a long way, and sooner or later, you’ll find the people that are ready to tap what you’ve got to offer.
Amber – I think you points are bang on. I’m very passionate about social being used by the entire enterprise. But there’s an old saying that “if everybody takes ownership of this, nobody takes ownership”. If these social tools are going to penetrate deep into a company, somebody has to be responsible for it. Which means that somebody needs to be given a budget to implement it.
I don’t think this is going to change until somebody from McKinsey comes in and says that social tools need to be implemented across the board an that along with it we should blow up silos and budgets. I think we have a much better shot at the end goal (“social media is a co-op”) if we start by playing the game like they want it played.
That’s just my practical side speaking.
Steve,
Ordinarily I’d agree with your practical side, but not this time. I see where you’re going, and you might be right for some of the lagging adoption or companies that need the analysts to tell them what to do. But I’m saying that everyone HAS budgets, and if they’re working as a team, they figure out how to use their bits and pieces to put it together.
Innovation and leading edge stuff has to happen before the analysts say so. If companies are willing to follow rather than lead, then maybe “playing the game” is the way to go.
For me, I’m not content to put that approach out there. I believe that the case can be made without waiting for all the pundits to arrive at some weighty conclusion. Agility wins today.
A
Amber – I think you points are bang on. I’m very passionate about social being used by the entire enterprise. But there’s an old saying that “if everybody takes ownership of this, nobody takes ownership”. If these social tools are going to penetrate deep into a company, somebody has to be responsible for it. Which means that somebody needs to be given a budget to implement it.
I don’t think this is going to change until somebody from McKinsey comes in and says that social tools need to be implemented across the board an that along with it we should blow up silos and budgets. I think we have a much better shot at the end goal (“social media is a co-op”) if we start by playing the game like they want it played.
That’s just my practical side speaking.
Steve,
Ordinarily I’d agree with your practical side, but not this time. I see where you’re going, and you might be right for some of the lagging adoption or companies that need the analysts to tell them what to do. But I’m saying that everyone HAS budgets, and if they’re working as a team, they figure out how to use their bits and pieces to put it together.
Innovation and leading edge stuff has to happen before the analysts say so. If companies are willing to follow rather than lead, then maybe “playing the game” is the way to go.
For me, I’m not content to put that approach out there. I believe that the case can be made without waiting for all the pundits to arrive at some weighty conclusion. Agility wins today.
A
100% agreed! And thanks for elevating the issue and setting it in its proper perspective Amber. Super stuff.
100% agreed! And thanks for elevating the issue and setting it in its proper perspective Amber. Super stuff.
Hierarchies are but another way of controlling — not just the message but also the people delivering it. Silos are created in part to make problems easier to fix. Making a social media program the responsibility of one department means it can be cut if it doesn’t work. Of course, making it that department’s responsibility also stacks the deck against it.
This might be one of the strongest arguments for starting a social media program internally — allowing employees to communicate and collaborate freely, allowing the higher-ups to see how it works and all of the possibilities, before slowly extending outward to customers.
I love the idea of doing things internally. It opens up lots of eyes and points to all sorts of possibilities, while working out some of the kinks AND identifying some of the potential culture barriers.
Hierarchies are but another way of controlling — not just the message but also the people delivering it. Silos are created in part to make problems easier to fix. Making a social media program the responsibility of one department means it can be cut if it doesn’t work. Of course, making it that department’s responsibility also stacks the deck against it.
This might be one of the strongest arguments for starting a social media program internally — allowing employees to communicate and collaborate freely, allowing the higher-ups to see how it works and all of the possibilities, before slowly extending outward to customers.
I love the idea of doing things internally. It opens up lots of eyes and points to all sorts of possibilities, while working out some of the kinks AND identifying some of the potential culture barriers.
I think if you have a person who is open to new ideas and you have an innovative leader then they are more then likely to buy into this concept. I think it gets harder when they just don’t understand.
I agree… customers don’t care which department you are in. You just need to be the voice of the answer to the question.
I think if you have a person who is open to new ideas and you have an innovative leader then they are more then likely to buy into this concept. I think it gets harder when they just don’t understand.
I agree… customers don’t care which department you are in. You just need to be the voice of the answer to the question.
Great Post Amber,
I think the graphic way to put this is take the organization chart and draw a cloud on top of all of it, that’s what Social Media is. It doesn’t belong to a department it’s something that must involve all the organization because it changes our surroundings and therefore all the strategy. Now our job is to educate the people on top about how this affects business and what will taking no action mean in the future.
The problem is that companies still organize in an old way while some others apply a Spaghetti Bowl Organization (you see a disorganized mess but when you pull a Spaghetti there’s a group of people doing something, and people can be part of many Spaghettis at once – taken from a book named Funky Business).
As Caroline says what should matter to a business is not who is accountable for it it should just be ‘How do I make my costumers happy’ because that makes a company successful and happy too.
Great Post Amber,
I think the graphic way to put this is take the organization chart and draw a cloud on top of all of it, that’s what Social Media is. It doesn’t belong to a department it’s something that must involve all the organization because it changes our surroundings and therefore all the strategy. Now our job is to educate the people on top about how this affects business and what will taking no action mean in the future.
The problem is that companies still organize in an old way while some others apply a Spaghetti Bowl Organization (you see a disorganized mess but when you pull a Spaghetti there’s a group of people doing something, and people can be part of many Spaghettis at once – taken from a book named Funky Business).
As Caroline says what should matter to a business is not who is accountable for it it should just be ‘How do I make my costumers happy’ because that makes a company successful and happy too.
Amber, interesting point of view.
In my opinion, “social media” is not a distinct discipline in that sense that PR or advertising or customer service or market research are.
In reality, what we have dubbed “social media” are a set of platforms and tactics that can be used by many different business functions. Ray D’s analogy to the telephone is exactly right.
I think what’s holding social media back is that we’re imagining that it is one ginormous practice area rather than a collection of modest-sized tactics.
Amber, interesting point of view.
In my opinion, “social media” is not a distinct discipline in that sense that PR or advertising or customer service or market research are.
In reality, what we have dubbed “social media” are a set of platforms and tactics that can be used by many different business functions. Ray D’s analogy to the telephone is exactly right.
I think what’s holding social media back is that we’re imagining that it is one ginormous practice area rather than a collection of modest-sized tactics.
Amber,
Great points! Social media is here to stay and thus needs to be an integral part of any organization.
The best organizations won’t try and “pass the buck,” but instead take on the important task of integrating social media throughout the entire organization.
Thanks for this important reminder.
Amber,
Great points! Social media is here to stay and thus needs to be an integral part of any organization.
The best organizations won’t try and “pass the buck,” but instead take on the important task of integrating social media throughout the entire organization.
Thanks for this important reminder.
Amber,
I kind of agree. The idea that social media and usage of social media should flow through the entire org is correct IMHO. However, the reality of corp america is that it has to live somewhere. It has to have a budget line and most importantly, it has to be item #1-5 on someone’s daily to-do list. Otherwise, it falls victim to “not my job” and “dude i just ran out of hours today.” So it starts off with a bang, like most new programs in any company, but after time it falls victim to “next shiny object” syndrome and the whole effort starts to fall apart.
My 02.
@TomMartin
Amber,
I kind of agree. The idea that social media and usage of social media should flow through the entire org is correct IMHO. However, the reality of corp america is that it has to live somewhere. It has to have a budget line and most importantly, it has to be item #1-5 on someone’s daily to-do list. Otherwise, it falls victim to “not my job” and “dude i just ran out of hours today.” So it starts off with a bang, like most new programs in any company, but after time it falls victim to “next shiny object” syndrome and the whole effort starts to fall apart.
My 02.
@TomMartin