The more popular social media gets, the more we’re developing mantras about what’s right and wrong, what’s okay and not, what’s acceptable or valuable or measurable or tasteful. This happens with everything, especially in business, and it’s endemic to the humanity behind all of this stuff.
So many of us have been waiting for years for a communication approach for business that doesn’t feel contrived and scripted. We are passionate about people connections and really, truly personal relationships with individuals, and we’ve become fiercely protective of what many of us are hoping is a new way of approaching people and relationships, both personally and in business.
That’s all good. I’m in your camp. I love people. I love humanized and personalized communication. I love the idea that we’re bringing stale practices into the spotlight to pick them apart and hopefully build something better and more promising down the road.
But boy am I getting tired of the self-righteousness and negativity. There’s more than one way to skin a cat, isn’t there? Do we all have to be lemmings and do things the same way, and doesn’t the very opt-in nature of all of this mean that we can choose what we tolerate, change those choices, and eventually gather with like-minded individuals if we so choose?
To me, the only things that are universally unacceptable:
- personal and defamatory attacks
- forcing down barriers I have erected to keep you out, like violating opt-outs I have initiated.
- invasions of personal privacy, which alludes to both of the above
Do I find spam and MLM and all that stuff distasteful and annoying? You bet I do. I’ll likely whine about it, because I’m human and it interrupts my world. Then I’ll unfollow or unfriend you, even though it creates work for me, but that’s the price I pay for wanting to be part of the larger network. Work that’s worthwhile to keep my stream clean of the junk I don’t want. Thankfully, I have the option. If it gets too much to bear, you can bet I’ll be making some difficult decisions about whether I stay in these wide open spaces, or whether I choose to change my participation online and focus on places where the filters are tighter.
But please stop with the preaching about the sanctity of social media. The web is about business too, and people are experimenting and figuring out what works. That means you won’t like some of the approaches. You’ll be offended that someone is trying to make money off of something you hold so personally dear. That they’re sponsoring their tweets or putting ads on their blog or updating their Facebook status too much with games and quizzes.
Then stop giving them your attention. Focus elsewhere. Let them follow their own path and allow THEIR community or customers or audience or followers speak with THEIR attention. And above all, can we please stop vilifying and labeling people that do things differently than we do? It’s really driving me crazy, and it’s giving business the impression that we’re a snarky, negative bunch just waiting to pounce on the next person who doesn’t fit our mold. If their approach is truly broken, they’ll learn by virtue of an empty room.
Also, we as empassioned advocates of these tools and strategies need to understand something very clearly: many businesses and people aren’t even close to immersion in this stuff. Not even close. Some of them are just starting, many don’t understand it, and they need stepping stones along the way. They’re not going to go from zero to perfection (and again, that’s subjective). That means tolerance and guidance and patience and teaching from those of us hopping up and down that we know and understand the potential when it’s “done right”.
Same goes for the contrarians that have now decided it’s cooler instead to be the anti-social media folks. The ones saying that SM isn’t valuable, measurable, applicable, whatever. That’s fine. Don’t use it. No one is forcing you, and you’re certainly not going to hurt my feelings if you don’t want to follow me on Twitter anymore or if you don’t think any of this is worth your time. Do it your way. That’s the beauty of all of this. But stop beating people up because they do find value in this. Your negativity and snark alone isn’t teaching anyone a thing.
I try very hard to back up my frustrations with constructive alternatives. In other words, I lecture myself about this very subject. Because if I’m going to have any credibility at all in my field and using these approaches and tools to help businesses and their people do things better, I need to be able to explain why some strategies might be more effective than others. I can’t just tell them “don’t sell on Twitter” unless I can explain to them what approach is better and more fruitful, and prove it. And I can’t just say this stuff is valuable without articulating why and how it matters.
I am working my butt off each and every day to try and build value in this stuff, and share what I know with you. You don’t have to agree. And to that end, I welcome your discussion, your articulate arguments, your debate and your sharing of what you know and believe. There is beauty in graceful discourse.
But I’m all done with the preaching and blustering and “you’re doing it wrong” stuff. This is far too vast a countryside for there to be one path through the dirt. And I’m going to follow my own advice, choose to focus elsewhere, and build something instead (now that I’ve got this post out of my system 🙂 ).
So, hey. If I’m doing it wrong and if my approach is all bent out of shape, go prove me wrong. Go build something bigger and better and kick my butt. We have the same tools at our disposal and the same 24 hours in each day, what differs is our priorities, work ethic, approach, mindset, and strategy. Do it differently. Show me up. Create something amazing. Lead by example. You have a choice. I’m eager to learn from you.
Amen.
Amen.
I presume that at least part of the catalyst for this is the “sponsored tweets” debate being carried out on David Spinks’s blog, among other places.
You have hit exactly the right tone here. Frankly, having developed a relationship and a certain level of trust with you, if you were to promote something, I would take it seriously. If you got paid to do so, that would not alter my interest one tiny little bit. I have greater faith in you than that.
And I would really like for you to get paid. I presume you would wish the same for me.
If you go over the line, I’ll unfriend you, unfollow you, whatever, exactly as you would me in return. @bethharte had a post on self-promotion last week, and it was a good one. Most of us assume the line is so far back that we don’t promote even those things we really believe in – like ourselves. I think my community could stand a bit more commercialization, personally.
And there will be some that disagree, and they may leave or not. There will be countless millions that use Twitter as a push-advertising medium anyway, who will be utterly unaffected by any of this. We shall all find ways to coexist, I predict. But then, you did too, and much more eloquently, above.
What a great post.
I presume that at least part of the catalyst for this is the “sponsored tweets” debate being carried out on David Spinks’s blog, among other places.
You have hit exactly the right tone here. Frankly, having developed a relationship and a certain level of trust with you, if you were to promote something, I would take it seriously. If you got paid to do so, that would not alter my interest one tiny little bit. I have greater faith in you than that.
And I would really like for you to get paid. I presume you would wish the same for me.
If you go over the line, I’ll unfriend you, unfollow you, whatever, exactly as you would me in return. @bethharte had a post on self-promotion last week, and it was a good one. Most of us assume the line is so far back that we don’t promote even those things we really believe in – like ourselves. I think my community could stand a bit more commercialization, personally.
And there will be some that disagree, and they may leave or not. There will be countless millions that use Twitter as a push-advertising medium anyway, who will be utterly unaffected by any of this. We shall all find ways to coexist, I predict. But then, you did too, and much more eloquently, above.
What a great post.
It was actually only tangentially related to the sponsored tweets thing. It’s an issue that I’m seeing more and more, about everything. It’s not just about Tweets. It’s the idea that you know better than me or vice versa. No one has all the answers. As Jeremy deftly points out below, humility needs to play a role in all of this, and it’s too easily forgotten.
Great as always, Amber.
I wanted to address a few points, though. Its funny how global the “if you dont like it, change the channel” statement is with regards to culture in general, but specifically relevant to social networking, being a 99% opt-in medium.
Although there are those ‘anti-SM’ folks who are really just using that tirade to try to make that a differentiator for them in the SM space, there are those who honestly and accurately take issue with certain aspects of the culture that has grown up around people in the SM space. In any group or industry, there are ‘bad apples’ and folks who take thing to a self-serving place, and to not call them out on it makes those of us who believe in a more balanced approach look bad by getting lumped in.
I feel like most of the criticisms lodged against “social media d-bags” are more based on personality and how the medium is treated, revered and corrupted by them than any criticism of actual authentic b2c communication.
Lots of bad people do it right and lots of well-meaning people do it wrong.
It’s not necessarily our “job,” as people with a particular viewpoint on where the value lies, to “educate” the “unenlightened”, but those who are well-known and respected may feel a sense of obligation to be a resource for those who have questions. It’s a fine line, and basically a humility judgment.
Great as always, Amber.
I wanted to address a few points, though. Its funny how global the “if you dont like it, change the channel” statement is with regards to culture in general, but specifically relevant to social networking, being a 99% opt-in medium.
Although there are those ‘anti-SM’ folks who are really just using that tirade to try to make that a differentiator for them in the SM space, there are those who honestly and accurately take issue with certain aspects of the culture that has grown up around people in the SM space. In any group or industry, there are ‘bad apples’ and folks who take thing to a self-serving place, and to not call them out on it makes those of us who believe in a more balanced approach look bad by getting lumped in.
I feel like most of the criticisms lodged against “social media d-bags” are more based on personality and how the medium is treated, revered and corrupted by them than any criticism of actual authentic b2c communication.
Lots of bad people do it right and lots of well-meaning people do it wrong.
It’s not necessarily our “job,” as people with a particular viewpoint on where the value lies, to “educate” the “unenlightened”, but those who are well-known and respected may feel a sense of obligation to be a resource for those who have questions. It’s a fine line, and basically a humility judgment.
That’s very well said, Jeremy. Like I said, I don’t take issue with disagreement. That’s healthy. Discussion is good, providing that we’re discussing alternatives and points of substance, not just – as you point out – the railing against things for the sake of being different.
I have issues with some of the ways SM is done, too. And I understand that getting lumped in with the dumbasses can be damaging. But.
I’m a HUGE believer that your actions and what you build speaks volumes, more so than anything else. Get out there and change it with what you do. By all means speak your mind. But the real proof, as they say, is in the pudding.
Obviously, I’ve been guilty of the occasional SM-related rant, but it comes from a place of wanting to call out behaviors that take away from the ultimate goal in a broad sense, and make it more difficult for people to sell-through the ideas to companies that may benefit.
The whole “we had some guy who wanted to get us on twitter but he was such an asshole we scrapped the whole thing” doesn’t do any good for anyone.
That’s absolutely true, and I understand where those rants come from. I’ve written a few myself, and several more that I never published. Frustration is part of the deal, and I really do get it.
I suppose what I’m after is more people calling out the behavior if they think it’s wrong, but making the case for the alternative instead. So rather than just say “this approach sucks”, tell me why it sucks, and what I might be able to do instead.
I get your point that it’s not everyone’s job to teach or guide. But if you’re going to stand on a pulpit and preach against the sins of social media and it’s related douchebags, I guess my point is that you’d better have in hand your version of what’s better to show for it.
That approach doesn’t do any good for anyone, true. But neither does railing against it without some indication of what the alternative might look like.
If that was a rant, nicely put, love the high road you take in this post. As someone just venturing into SM it’s encouraging to hear a nurturing yet pragmatic voice.
Thanks,
jg
If that was a rant, nicely put, love the high road you take in this post. As someone just venturing into SM it’s encouraging to hear a nurturing yet pragmatic voice.
Thanks,
jg
What bothers me more than the purism are the complaints without action. Maybe it’s to create conversation through controversy? Look, if you’re a purist, if you want only non-commercial content in your social media experience, make it happen. Filter your Twitter stream, moderate your blog, don’t let the commercial side find its way in. But, if you don’t do your part to keep your communities “pure”, then be quiet.
Admittedly, I think we’ve all had our moments of elitism and purism around here because we’re so excited that a space finally exists to foster actual conversation, not be blasted or talked AT, and we want to keep it that way. There’s a fear that if you give someone an inch they’ll take a mile and then the whole relationship-building, conversation-having party will be ruined. So now this fierce protectiveness abounds to keep social media out of the mire. The reality is there will always be a different way to get to Point B, and not everyone will do it the best or most pure way, but who are we to say the other way is crappy and ineffective? You’re right, they’ll figure out that their method doesn’t work when the leads dwindle.
To me, the divide is highlighted by those who teach versus those who preach. The teachers are focused on doing what they can to enlighten people to the good that social technologies can foster for business. They’re quiet on the complaints, loud on the questions and discussions that get people to have “Ah ha!” moments. The preachers get mad at those doing it wrong and chastise them without offering them an alternative.
There needs to be less berating, more teaching. For all of us. This was a good reminder for me, too. Thanks, Amber. 🙂
What bothers me more than the purism are the complaints without action. Maybe it’s to create conversation through controversy? Look, if you’re a purist, if you want only non-commercial content in your social media experience, make it happen. Filter your Twitter stream, moderate your blog, don’t let the commercial side find its way in. But, if you don’t do your part to keep your communities “pure”, then be quiet.
Admittedly, I think we’ve all had our moments of elitism and purism around here because we’re so excited that a space finally exists to foster actual conversation, not be blasted or talked AT, and we want to keep it that way. There’s a fear that if you give someone an inch they’ll take a mile and then the whole relationship-building, conversation-having party will be ruined. So now this fierce protectiveness abounds to keep social media out of the mire. The reality is there will always be a different way to get to Point B, and not everyone will do it the best or most pure way, but who are we to say the other way is crappy and ineffective? You’re right, they’ll figure out that their method doesn’t work when the leads dwindle.
To me, the divide is highlighted by those who teach versus those who preach. The teachers are focused on doing what they can to enlighten people to the good that social technologies can foster for business. They’re quiet on the complaints, loud on the questions and discussions that get people to have “Ah ha!” moments. The preachers get mad at those doing it wrong and chastise them without offering them an alternative.
There needs to be less berating, more teaching. For all of us. This was a good reminder for me, too. Thanks, Amber. 🙂
This comment is pure gold, Teresa. Good stuff. Thanks so much for being here.
Obviously, I’ve been guilty of the occasional SM-related rant, but it comes from a place of wanting to call out behaviors that take away from the ultimate goal in a broad sense, and make it more difficult for people to sell-through the ideas to companies that may benefit.
The whole “we had some guy who wanted to get us on twitter but he was such an asshole we scrapped the whole thing” doesn’t do any good for anyone.
I find the discussion around Social Media lately to be akin to people discussing how to date. If you gather 10 people around and have a discussion on the right way to date – you’ll get 10 different answers. Sure, you’ll come to some consensus on socially acceptable behaviors, but that’s about it. Social Media is the same.
The sponsored tweet discussion bores me simply because, as you said above, there is more than one way to skin a cat. I’m lucky enough to work for a company that has a diverse and engaged community but not all companies or brands have that luxury. Sometimes you have to pay to play – and that’s fine. I’d rather have it done in a structured, transparent way that adheres to what I think are the socially acceptable behaviors of the sphere than have it be a cut-throat, no rules wasteland that it potentially will be if people don’t open themselves up to alternative methodologies and discuss proper behaviors for them (because money/sponsorship was ultimately going to enter this realm regardless of the purists or not).
And finally, in the end – it’s an opt-in culture. If the masses truly don’t want the sponsored tweets, they’ll unfollow people that do them and ultimately that person won’t see a revenue potential there. So, act – don’t just complain (said much better by Teresa above).
I find the discussion around Social Media lately to be akin to people discussing how to date. If you gather 10 people around and have a discussion on the right way to date – you’ll get 10 different answers. Sure, you’ll come to some consensus on socially acceptable behaviors, but that’s about it. Social Media is the same.
The sponsored tweet discussion bores me simply because, as you said above, there is more than one way to skin a cat. I’m lucky enough to work for a company that has a diverse and engaged community but not all companies or brands have that luxury. Sometimes you have to pay to play – and that’s fine. I’d rather have it done in a structured, transparent way that adheres to what I think are the socially acceptable behaviors of the sphere than have it be a cut-throat, no rules wasteland that it potentially will be if people don’t open themselves up to alternative methodologies and discuss proper behaviors for them (because money/sponsorship was ultimately going to enter this realm regardless of the purists or not).
And finally, in the end – it’s an opt-in culture. If the masses truly don’t want the sponsored tweets, they’ll unfollow people that do them and ultimately that person won’t see a revenue potential there. So, act – don’t just complain (said much better by Teresa above).
Remember play-doh? Didn’t come with a lot of instructions did it? Open the can, squish it around, mix the colors, just don’t leave it out in the sun too long. I don’t recall anyone telling me that I was playing my play-doh wrong. If someone did do this, they’d be laughed off the spot.. or ignored.
Social Media reminds me of play-doh. Make what you want. Do what you want. Maybe there are better ways for people to be using social media. That’s fine. I come from the perspective that maybe they don’t know better. As Teresa Basich pointed out this is an opportunity to share and teach, which becomes a mutual opportunity to learn.
Play with social media. Use the social media fun factory to experiment and try new things. But like Play-Doh, just don’t eat it… or maybe we should…
Remember play-doh? Didn’t come with a lot of instructions did it? Open the can, squish it around, mix the colors, just don’t leave it out in the sun too long. I don’t recall anyone telling me that I was playing my play-doh wrong. If someone did do this, they’d be laughed off the spot.. or ignored.
Social Media reminds me of play-doh. Make what you want. Do what you want. Maybe there are better ways for people to be using social media. That’s fine. I come from the perspective that maybe they don’t know better. As Teresa Basich pointed out this is an opportunity to share and teach, which becomes a mutual opportunity to learn.
Play with social media. Use the social media fun factory to experiment and try new things. But like Play-Doh, just don’t eat it… or maybe we should…
I love the approach you take in this post. Your clear openness and encouragement to let people do what they’re going to do in social media is awesome. Too many are criticizing, whining, and claiming the “higher knowledge” without realizing we are all learning and growing… Great post 🙂
I love the approach you take in this post. Your clear openness and encouragement to let people do what they’re going to do in social media is awesome. Too many are criticizing, whining, and claiming the “higher knowledge” without realizing we are all learning and growing… Great post 🙂
Amber, you are my hero for writing this.
Amber, you are my hero for writing this.
Thumbs up to the string of thoughts, and chuckles in mass quantities over these conversations. The analogy of playing with social media like we did with Play-Doh hit me where I personally live. While I always preferred the Kangaroo Paste (and playing with all of the above can be sticky) what is truly accomplished, I believe, is exposure.
Limiting our skill sets and thoughts to an immediate working group these days seems defeating. Kindof like drinking our own bathwater because that’s the most immediate relief for thirst.
I’m thinking I like taste options.
Thumbs up to the string of thoughts, and chuckles in mass quantities over these conversations. The analogy of playing with social media like we did with Play-Doh hit me where I personally live. While I always preferred the Kangaroo Paste (and playing with all of the above can be sticky) what is truly accomplished, I believe, is exposure.
Limiting our skill sets and thoughts to an immediate working group these days seems defeating. Kindof like drinking our own bathwater because that’s the most immediate relief for thirst.
I’m thinking I like taste options.
Amber, you said it well re: “the proof is in the pudding.” People can talk all they want, but if there is no action, then there’s really nothing else left to talk about is there? Another good point above is that while these conversations about what is perceived as right and wrong in social media are going on, there is still a large part of the population who hasn’t even learned the basics yet!! Let’s hope those folks know enough to stick with people like you who can mentor them into knowing the difference between what’s real and BS. I consider you a credible source and your efforts in generating helpful, educational content are amazing! As far as what’s right or wrong in social media, there are plenty of blog posts out there on that, but you have to pick them apart because they may not apply to everyone.
Amber, you said it well re: “the proof is in the pudding.” People can talk all they want, but if there is no action, then there’s really nothing else left to talk about is there? Another good point above is that while these conversations about what is perceived as right and wrong in social media are going on, there is still a large part of the population who hasn’t even learned the basics yet!! Let’s hope those folks know enough to stick with people like you who can mentor them into knowing the difference between what’s real and BS. I consider you a credible source and your efforts in generating helpful, educational content are amazing! As far as what’s right or wrong in social media, there are plenty of blog posts out there on that, but you have to pick them apart because they may not apply to everyone.
What a refreshing and, most importantly, insightful post, Amber. I think I may be as guilty as anyone of being protective of the SM realm. I fear losing the transparent conversation I enjoy with others by getting mired down by all the salesmanship going on in the wings of social media. Thankfully, you’ve somehow managed to assuage some of that fear.
I believe you’re correct when you say the abusers will “learn by virtue of an empty room” while the rest of us will continue to learn from and shape the way we communicate, and that’s what really matters, right?
Thanks again for the post. It’s encouraging to see some personality behind a social media post. You’ve gained a happy subscriber. Mike
What a refreshing and, most importantly, insightful post, Amber. I think I may be as guilty as anyone of being protective of the SM realm. I fear losing the transparent conversation I enjoy with others by getting mired down by all the salesmanship going on in the wings of social media. Thankfully, you’ve somehow managed to assuage some of that fear.
I believe you’re correct when you say the abusers will “learn by virtue of an empty room” while the rest of us will continue to learn from and shape the way we communicate, and that’s what really matters, right?
Thanks again for the post. It’s encouraging to see some personality behind a social media post. You’ve gained a happy subscriber. Mike
“Extreme positions are not succeeded by moderate ones, but by contrary extreme positions.” –Nietzsche
What worries me about all of this is that our normal human instinct to shut out those that aren’t like us denies the opportunity for the very conversation that is at the heart and soul of what I think social media–communication–is all about.
Don’t get me wrong, I unfollow the spammers and block the porn, too, so I haven’t found the answer. Clearly, by some set of values that I do not understand, what these folks do is okay with them. And, one must assume, they are okay with others that do it, too. They are not decrying the actions of their peers, because they must, at some level, understand what I simply do not. But I do wish there were some forum (and clearly blog comments and tweets ain’t it) where we could also just figure each other out a bit more.
Is it possible that this is just a normal part of group dynamics (forming, storming, norming, performing) writ on a massive, and public scale?
But if we close the avenues for dialogue, how do we move forward? And if the current modes of dialogue aren’t working, what options can we find…or make?
“Extreme positions are not succeeded by moderate ones, but by contrary extreme positions.” –Nietzsche
What worries me about all of this is that our normal human instinct to shut out those that aren’t like us denies the opportunity for the very conversation that is at the heart and soul of what I think social media–communication–is all about.
Don’t get me wrong, I unfollow the spammers and block the porn, too, so I haven’t found the answer. Clearly, by some set of values that I do not understand, what these folks do is okay with them. And, one must assume, they are okay with others that do it, too. They are not decrying the actions of their peers, because they must, at some level, understand what I simply do not. But I do wish there were some forum (and clearly blog comments and tweets ain’t it) where we could also just figure each other out a bit more.
Is it possible that this is just a normal part of group dynamics (forming, storming, norming, performing) writ on a massive, and public scale?
But if we close the avenues for dialogue, how do we move forward? And if the current modes of dialogue aren’t working, what options can we find…or make?
While I don’t advocate for cat-skinning of any sort, I really enjoyed this post, Amber.
We sometimes forget that social media is largely free, opt-in and open. In order for it to evolve, people have to try new things. Not everyone will like the results, and that’s fine. We all have options available to us to turn off what we think is annoying. Instead of fighting to get everyone to “conform” to the somewhat arbitrary standards the early adopters have created for social media platforms, it may be a better use of our time to thin out follower lists, opt-out of certain services or enable privacy controls on our profiles.
Hopefully the annoying stuff won’t work and will eventually fade away as it’s proven to be ineffective. I certainly don’t get too many e-mail chain letters anymore.
While I don’t advocate for cat-skinning of any sort, I really enjoyed this post, Amber.
We sometimes forget that social media is largely free, opt-in and open. In order for it to evolve, people have to try new things. Not everyone will like the results, and that’s fine. We all have options available to us to turn off what we think is annoying. Instead of fighting to get everyone to “conform” to the somewhat arbitrary standards the early adopters have created for social media platforms, it may be a better use of our time to thin out follower lists, opt-out of certain services or enable privacy controls on our profiles.
Hopefully the annoying stuff won’t work and will eventually fade away as it’s proven to be ineffective. I certainly don’t get too many e-mail chain letters anymore.
AMEN!
I just read @jaybaer’s blog and commented what you say above about what is UNacceptable!
Being mean, spiteful, or unprofessional just doesn’t cut it. Social media is about relationships and, if you wouldn’t say what you post anonymously (or as spam) on the social networks or on blogs to a person’s face, you shouldn’t say it all.
And about it being opt-in? I agree. I talk to business owners daily who give me 16,000 reasons they can’t/won’t/don’t want to try social media. My answer is always the same…It’s no skin off my nose if you don’t participate. I’m just here to tell you what’s going on in the world right now.
AMEN!
I just read @jaybaer’s blog and commented what you say above about what is UNacceptable!
Being mean, spiteful, or unprofessional just doesn’t cut it. Social media is about relationships and, if you wouldn’t say what you post anonymously (or as spam) on the social networks or on blogs to a person’s face, you shouldn’t say it all.
And about it being opt-in? I agree. I talk to business owners daily who give me 16,000 reasons they can’t/won’t/don’t want to try social media. My answer is always the same…It’s no skin off my nose if you don’t participate. I’m just here to tell you what’s going on in the world right now.
Thank you for sharing this, Amber. I think the reason many people find social media networks (particularly Twitter) overwhelming is because there are so many voices talking about what’s the best/worst way to have a social media presence and who we should/shouldn’t be listening to. And when those people shell out conflicting opinions, it’s bound to drive anyone nuts! I agree with your thoughts on what’s universally unacceptable and think people would enjoy social media more if they didn’t feel so pressured to follow the so-called “rules”.
Thank you for sharing this, Amber. I think the reason many people find social media networks (particularly Twitter) overwhelming is because there are so many voices talking about what’s the best/worst way to have a social media presence and who we should/shouldn’t be listening to. And when those people shell out conflicting opinions, it’s bound to drive anyone nuts! I agree with your thoughts on what’s universally unacceptable and think people would enjoy social media more if they didn’t feel so pressured to follow the so-called “rules”.
This is great Amber. I have been thinking about all of this a lot lately myself and wrote on my blog about a similar subject. I’m a bit tired of people being classified as either the “thought leaders” or not, either a leader or a follower. There obviously are the hard core SM people that everyone knows and follows (and some seem to worship every word. This bothers me. Social Media is a relatively new outlet for communication. It is in constant flux; changing and developing. Businesses are experimenting and finding new ways to utilize social media. There are obvious spammers and abusers that annoy just about everyone, but that those people aside, who is to say what is right and wrong? I am getting tired of the holier than thou attitude of some of the “thought leaders.” I have never been a follower type, nor would I want anyone to blindly follow what I have to say. I just do what I do in the best way that I can. I learn what I can from others and maybe others can even learn from me. We should all be open to let people utilize tools in ways that work for them, listen to what people are saying and watch how people are utilizing tools regardless of their name recognition, years in the business or subscriber/follower numbers. We do have options to unfollow, block, express our opinions, but the rules are being built as we go. Pioneering social media gurus don’t have ownership of Internet. We are all here together. Learning can take place from surprising places.
This is great Amber. I have been thinking about all of this a lot lately myself and wrote on my blog about a similar subject. I’m a bit tired of people being classified as either the “thought leaders” or not, either a leader or a follower. There obviously are the hard core SM people that everyone knows and follows (and some seem to worship every word. This bothers me. Social Media is a relatively new outlet for communication. It is in constant flux; changing and developing. Businesses are experimenting and finding new ways to utilize social media. There are obvious spammers and abusers that annoy just about everyone, but that those people aside, who is to say what is right and wrong? I am getting tired of the holier than thou attitude of some of the “thought leaders.” I have never been a follower type, nor would I want anyone to blindly follow what I have to say. I just do what I do in the best way that I can. I learn what I can from others and maybe others can even learn from me. We should all be open to let people utilize tools in ways that work for them, listen to what people are saying and watch how people are utilizing tools regardless of their name recognition, years in the business or subscriber/follower numbers. We do have options to unfollow, block, express our opinions, but the rules are being built as we go. Pioneering social media gurus don’t have ownership of Internet. We are all here together. Learning can take place from surprising places.
Whenever I read your thoughts…I think…is she reading my mind?! I preach to those that complain– you have a choice….make the choice, don’t knock something because you feel a certain way. Opt in, or out…it is your choice.
The world we live in will connect us in newer ways that ever imagined. I’m part of the X Generation–work hard, learned from my elders, and continue to want to learn from the Y’s out there…because we are all part of one big world. Let’s learn from each other!
Whenever I read your thoughts…I think…is she reading my mind?! I preach to those that complain– you have a choice….make the choice, don’t knock something because you feel a certain way. Opt in, or out…it is your choice.
The world we live in will connect us in newer ways that ever imagined. I’m part of the X Generation–work hard, learned from my elders, and continue to want to learn from the Y’s out there…because we are all part of one big world. Let’s learn from each other!
Yes, well said…
I’ve blogged about this too as I have been working with sports teams to monetize their social media strategies with sponsorship…
Thanks Amber
Yes, well said…
I’ve blogged about this too as I have been working with sports teams to monetize their social media strategies with sponsorship…
Thanks Amber
There’s right and wrong, and then there’s just plain dumb. Some of the stuff on social media may not break those rather unclear “rules,” but in my opinion, it’s just plain dumb to go about offending large numbers of people!
Even seemly sane people can get caught up in the MLM pep rallies and lose their heads in offending their readers. One contact even scolded me not to miss the “blessings” her MLM company had to offer. Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad!
There’s right and wrong, and then there’s just plain dumb. Some of the stuff on social media may not break those rather unclear “rules,” but in my opinion, it’s just plain dumb to go about offending large numbers of people!
Even seemly sane people can get caught up in the MLM pep rallies and lose their heads in offending their readers. One contact even scolded me not to miss the “blessings” her MLM company had to offer. Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad!
The comments are sometimes the best part of your posts! Love what you write (as always), but man…great comments. My favorite one is from Teresa:
“To me, the divide is highlighted by those who teach versus those who preach. The teachers are focused on doing what they can to enlighten people to the good that social technologies can foster for business. They’re quiet on the complaints, loud on the questions and discussions that get people to have “Ah ha!” moments. The preachers get mad at those doing it wrong and chastise them without offering them an alternative.”
Teachers vs Preachers. That’s a blog post in and of itself.
DJ Waldow
Director of Community at Blue Sky Factory
@djwaldow
The comments are sometimes the best part of your posts! Love what you write (as always), but man…great comments. My favorite one is from Teresa:
“To me, the divide is highlighted by those who teach versus those who preach. The teachers are focused on doing what they can to enlighten people to the good that social technologies can foster for business. They’re quiet on the complaints, loud on the questions and discussions that get people to have “Ah ha!” moments. The preachers get mad at those doing it wrong and chastise them without offering them an alternative.”
Teachers vs Preachers. That’s a blog post in and of itself.
DJ Waldow
Director of Community at Blue Sky Factory
@djwaldow
Amber,
Great post. You make great points that everyone should take to heart.
@sethgoldstein
Amber,
Great post. You make great points that everyone should take to heart.
@sethgoldstein
Wonderfully cogent presentation! I’ve said it/tweeted it before, and I’ll say it again. SNARK does not equal SMART. Well done! @karyncooks
Wonderfully cogent presentation! I’ve said it/tweeted it before, and I’ll say it again. SNARK does not equal SMART. Well done! @karyncooks