Is it possible that some organizations just simply aren’t ready for social media adoption?
Yep.
Why? Because they’re not equipped, ready, or open to evolve or change the way they’ve been doing things.
Sometimes, it’s because change is complex, as in industries that are highly matrixed, or have complex regulatory or compliance issues that will require lots of detailed, nuanced, and potentially frustrating conversations with the powers that oversee such things.
Sometimes, it’s because we just can’t seem to find a solution for the things standing in our way. We’re not prepared to have the conversations, or ask the hard questions, or make staffing or operational changes to make change happen.
Sometimes, it’s because of out and out fear of the unknown, and the unwillingness to risk known quantities and accepted norms for things that are unproven or lack precedent and success standards.
Sometimes, it’s the inability or unwillingness to reallocate human and capital resources to something that doesn’t have established procedures and processes that ensure some level of efficiency out of the gate.
Sometimes, it’s because we misunderstand or haven’t thought through all of the implications – both positive and negative – for new ideas, and aren’t willing to spend the time doing so.
Sometimes, it’s just willful ignorance.
Innovation isn’t everyone’s bag, and we are still in the phase with social media where the companies that are doing this at scale and with long term intent are deserving of the label of trailblazers. Not every company is prepared to be first. Not every company is prepared to take the risks that come with trying something new or different. And you know what? That’s okay.
Yes, there’s proof that social media works. More and more of it. But the critical mass of proof is going to be different for every organization’s culture and risk tolerance level.
If you are working in or with one of the organizations that is digging their heels in, you have two choices, and two only.
You can continue to work in small, progressive steps toward re-engineering your organization in whatever capacity you can. You will have to find like minds, recruit help, teach, re-teach, show, try, demonstrate, explain, justify, negotiate, compromise. You will need to be fiercely committed to the idea you are the translator and the illustrator, but it’s only time and tenacity that will help you make strides. Some will be small. Some steps will be backward. And eventually, you may find that you have either inched forward, or uncovered a lost cause.
The alternative is to walk away. Let them be. For some of you, that means being brave enough to go find a new job if this matters enough to you. For some, that means saying no to a client because they’re not yet ready to take advantage of what you can help them do. But sometimes, this is the only right answer. Not everyone is ready yet, nor should they be.
The only filter for deciding which situation you’re facing? You. Your experience and intuition and tolerance level.
Am I passionate about this? You bet I am. But there are plenty of people and organizations passionate but uneducated. Ready, but who need guidance. Curious, but who need reassurance and some help along the way. I’m ready to concentrate on them – the ones with the mindset if not the framework – and let the other folks find their way when they’re ready. I can’t save them all, and neither can you.
Our job is to illustrate and inform. Theirs is to choose. You can only lead the horse.
image by Allen Dale Thompson
In the legal industry it seems we have a definite division on the social media front. Some lawyers are embracing it wholehearted and seeing what it can do for client development, research, and networking. Others are curious, dipping their toe in, creating profiles, and lurking. A large majority however are still not convinced. This doesn’t surprise me as an ABA Technology Study revealed in 2005 that some partners in major law firms still didn’t have computers in their office b/c their secretaries had one! The Blackberry has done wonders for breaking the technology gap – we’ll have to wait and see what does it for the social media front. How does this affect the strategy of my company, LexisNexis (provider of tools and solutions for lawyers)? We are trying to learn all we can now about how lawyers can use social media, what the use cases are, how much time should a lawyer spend on it – these questions are guiding a lot of business decisions for us despite our industry’s hesitation. Having launched a community for lawyers (“Connected”) early this year, I can tell you that industry hesitation has impacted engagement efforts. It is difficult to engage a community that is reluctant to contribute, and with lawyers being a risk adverse bunch our task is no easier. As you say above “you can bring the horse to water;” hopefully they’ll get thirsty soon enough.
In the legal industry it seems we have a definite division on the social media front. Some lawyers are embracing it wholehearted and seeing what it can do for client development, research, and networking. Others are curious, dipping their toe in, creating profiles, and lurking. A large majority however are still not convinced. This doesn’t surprise me as an ABA Technology Study revealed in 2005 that some partners in major law firms still didn’t have computers in their office b/c their secretaries had one! The Blackberry has done wonders for breaking the technology gap – we’ll have to wait and see what does it for the social media front. How does this affect the strategy of my company, LexisNexis (provider of tools and solutions for lawyers)? We are trying to learn all we can now about how lawyers can use social media, what the use cases are, how much time should a lawyer spend on it – these questions are guiding a lot of business decisions for us despite our industry’s hesitation. Having launched a community for lawyers (“Connected”) early this year, I can tell you that industry hesitation has impacted engagement efforts. It is difficult to engage a community that is reluctant to contribute, and with lawyers being a risk adverse bunch our task is no easier. As you say above “you can bring the horse to water;” hopefully they’ll get thirsty soon enough.
GREAT post, very relevant in the association community, where there is lots of passion on the part of those who “get” social media and lots of resistance from those who, well, don’t. Rather than take up your whole comment section, if anyone is interested in the association world’s take on how this is playing out, there’s a great post on the American Society for Association Executives blog:
http://blogs.asaecenter.org/Acronym/2009/11/social_media_managers_are_we_d.html
GREAT post, very relevant in the association community, where there is lots of passion on the part of those who “get” social media and lots of resistance from those who, well, don’t. Rather than take up your whole comment section, if anyone is interested in the association world’s take on how this is playing out, there’s a great post on the American Society for Association Executives blog:
http://blogs.asaecenter.org/Acronym/2009/11/social_media_managers_are_we_d.html
Absolutely! Working with Insurance clients I have found that they are not yet sure how to enter the Social Media arena, from a legal point of view. Theirs is an industry tied by government and legal obligations. Disclosures, language and representation are all of concern. As is when knowing too much (of a customer or potential customer) is breaching rules of confidentiality or impartiality. As an industry, standards need to be set before they can truly embrace this channel.
Another business model facing unique challenges is that of the Franchisee/Corporate structure. Working with these types of businesses, I have found that Franchisees do not always comply with Corporate policy, nor are they always aware of them. It is difficult for Corporate to police Social Media activity of their Franchisees because they don’t have that built into their infrastructure, yet. There are instances of brand inconsistencies and watering down of message or vision because of this lack of clarity. Not to mention the lack of an “Official” voice, or voices. This can lead to confusing or misleading the consumer and thus defeat the purpose of Social Media engagement all together.
I believe that these are all issues that can and will be addressed, with time, research and commitment (as you so adeptly point out). The crux is who will invest in those things to be the case study for everyone else? And will results or standards be shared across the board or will they be held close to the vest?
Absolutely! Working with Insurance clients I have found that they are not yet sure how to enter the Social Media arena, from a legal point of view. Theirs is an industry tied by government and legal obligations. Disclosures, language and representation are all of concern. As is when knowing too much (of a customer or potential customer) is breaching rules of confidentiality or impartiality. As an industry, standards need to be set before they can truly embrace this channel.
Another business model facing unique challenges is that of the Franchisee/Corporate structure. Working with these types of businesses, I have found that Franchisees do not always comply with Corporate policy, nor are they always aware of them. It is difficult for Corporate to police Social Media activity of their Franchisees because they don’t have that built into their infrastructure, yet. There are instances of brand inconsistencies and watering down of message or vision because of this lack of clarity. Not to mention the lack of an “Official” voice, or voices. This can lead to confusing or misleading the consumer and thus defeat the purpose of Social Media engagement all together.
I believe that these are all issues that can and will be addressed, with time, research and commitment (as you so adeptly point out). The crux is who will invest in those things to be the case study for everyone else? And will results or standards be shared across the board or will they be held close to the vest?
I think you hit a key factor – not every client will be the same. There isn’t a cookie cutter strategy to implement social media. It is really a tailored solution that may not even be right for every fit just yet. That or sometimes we have to be that much more creative with how and why it is implemented.
Great post – thank you.
I think you hit a key factor – not every client will be the same. There isn’t a cookie cutter strategy to implement social media. It is really a tailored solution that may not even be right for every fit just yet. That or sometimes we have to be that much more creative with how and why it is implemented.
Great post – thank you.
Yep – you’re right on as usual Amber. One of the first questions I ask when working with a new client or agency partner is ‘Are you (or your client) prepared to have an open, honest, and ONGOING dialogue with your audience?’
This is usually followed by a period of silence as you can imagine. The fact is, not everyone IS ready for this type of commitment, and if they are not, they shouldn’t be forced into it. However, we should encourage them as much as possible. Seth had a great post on this earlier:
http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/12/is-it-too-late-to-catch-up.html
Thanks for the post Amber!
Yep – you’re right on as usual Amber. One of the first questions I ask when working with a new client or agency partner is ‘Are you (or your client) prepared to have an open, honest, and ONGOING dialogue with your audience?’
This is usually followed by a period of silence as you can imagine. The fact is, not everyone IS ready for this type of commitment, and if they are not, they shouldn’t be forced into it. However, we should encourage them as much as possible. Seth had a great post on this earlier:
http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/12/is-it-too-late-to-catch-up.html
Thanks for the post Amber!
Some organizations may want to engage online but face regulatory constraints. A company making medical devices, for example, needs to comply with FDA regulations regarding claims about the device. More than that, they need to document and address every complaint they receive about their products — which means they have to asses every comment on a blog they publish, for example, to determine if it would be considered a complaint.
This isn’t to say they should avoid social media. It means though that they must plan more carefully and assign more resources.
I fear we social media advocates sometimes underestimate the differences in others’ business environments. Thanks for highlighting the variability.
Some organizations may want to engage online but face regulatory constraints. A company making medical devices, for example, needs to comply with FDA regulations regarding claims about the device. More than that, they need to document and address every complaint they receive about their products — which means they have to asses every comment on a blog they publish, for example, to determine if it would be considered a complaint.
This isn’t to say they should avoid social media. It means though that they must plan more carefully and assign more resources.
I fear we social media advocates sometimes underestimate the differences in others’ business environments. Thanks for highlighting the variability.
…And sometimes, it’s a conscious choice. I’m glad you are not falling into the trap of painting all companies who are reluctant to wade into social media as companies that “just don’t get it.” Some companies may get it, judge the risks to be unacceptable, and move on. Different companies manage risks differently. Companies that take risks intelligently AND companies that intelligently minimize risk can both be successful.
It’s all the companies in between that don’t get it 🙂
…And sometimes, it’s a conscious choice. I’m glad you are not falling into the trap of painting all companies who are reluctant to wade into social media as companies that “just don’t get it.” Some companies may get it, judge the risks to be unacceptable, and move on. Different companies manage risks differently. Companies that take risks intelligently AND companies that intelligently minimize risk can both be successful.
It’s all the companies in between that don’t get it 🙂
Amber-
Great points.
I liken the social media ‘industry’ to the early stages of the search marketing side of the online ledger. As social has gone more mainstream the earliest adopters will say that social media and search have grown up together. Maybe so but not at the same rate. Search is a much ore mature environment and it is STILL a mystery to some industries and many smaller businesses.
Social will experience a similar cycle but may accelerate when there is the connection made that search and social are direct cousins. Maybe at that point the people who can truly produce results will be a hybrid.
It should be fun!
Amber-
Great points.
I liken the social media ‘industry’ to the early stages of the search marketing side of the online ledger. As social has gone more mainstream the earliest adopters will say that social media and search have grown up together. Maybe so but not at the same rate. Search is a much ore mature environment and it is STILL a mystery to some industries and many smaller businesses.
Social will experience a similar cycle but may accelerate when there is the connection made that search and social are direct cousins. Maybe at that point the people who can truly produce results will be a hybrid.
It should be fun!
The point of ‘small steps’ vs. ‘walk away’ is key Amber, as we have limited time and need to make it productive. At least those with the right mindset can be coached along the path, and that will lead to long term rewards.
I still encounter firms that believe it’s all a passing fad, who are not even concerned about what people are saying on the social media platforms.
On the other side are those companies who grasped email marketing long ago and paid attention to opens, click through rates and ultimate conversions. They understand that it’s another way to communicate and are willing to take the small steps, and they have the foundation to appreciate the results.
The point of ‘small steps’ vs. ‘walk away’ is key Amber, as we have limited time and need to make it productive. At least those with the right mindset can be coached along the path, and that will lead to long term rewards.
I still encounter firms that believe it’s all a passing fad, who are not even concerned about what people are saying on the social media platforms.
On the other side are those companies who grasped email marketing long ago and paid attention to opens, click through rates and ultimate conversions. They understand that it’s another way to communicate and are willing to take the small steps, and they have the foundation to appreciate the results.
“Audiences know what they expect and that is all they are prepared to believe in”
– The Player (from Rosencrantz and Gildenstern are Dead)
“Audiences know what they expect and that is all they are prepared to believe in”
– The Player (from Rosencrantz and Gildenstern are Dead)
When they get it, they’ll get it. Until then, don’t bother. You can’t do social media at bayonet point. You’re just setting yourself up for disaster.
When they get it, they’ll get it. Until then, don’t bother. You can’t do social media at bayonet point. You’re just setting yourself up for disaster.
Companies are slow to social media because WE make it more complicated than it is.
We FORMALIZE the discipline in an attempt to MONETIZE it. Our formalization backfires and breeds over-analysis from the people who can actually pay us.
I know Chipotle has a robust social media program, though I’ve managed to avoid it. I ate one of their burrito’s today. It was good.
I don’t want to be friends with Chipotle. If they have a social media plan I’ve managed to avoid it.
I don’t want a twitter update from Chipotle on my cell phone, I don’t want to visit the BurritoBlogger’s lair, but I’m sure some social media know-it-all is pitching all this to them right now, and we wonder why they’re slow to adopt: it’s stupid.
The guy in charge KNOWS it’s stupid. He can’t shake the feeling that he needs to retire and let the world as he knows it collapse.
When this guy retires, what a delightfully ridiculous social world will all be living in. Wee.
weirdguyinmask.wordpress.com
Companies are slow to social media because WE make it more complicated than it is.
We FORMALIZE the discipline in an attempt to MONETIZE it. Our formalization backfires and breeds over-analysis from the people who can actually pay us.
I know Chipotle has a robust social media program, though I’ve managed to avoid it. I ate one of their burrito’s today. It was good.
I don’t want to be friends with Chipotle. If they have a social media plan I’ve managed to avoid it.
I don’t want a twitter update from Chipotle on my cell phone, I don’t want to visit the BurritoBlogger’s lair, but I’m sure some social media know-it-all is pitching all this to them right now, and we wonder why they’re slow to adopt: it’s stupid.
The guy in charge KNOWS it’s stupid. He can’t shake the feeling that he needs to retire and let the world as he knows it collapse.
When this guy retires, what a delightfully ridiculous social world will all be living in. Wee.
weirdguyinmask.wordpress.com
Really good one…!
Really good one…!