I’m not sure what’s in the water, but there’s a general unrest right now with people in their jobs, careers, and industries. Especially people whose roles involve social, either officially or unofficially.
Actually, scratch that. I know exactly what’s in the water. Or at least part of it.
When it comes to roles that involve social media, community, or similar responsibilities, we made some mistakes in how we glorified them and set the expectations around their role (and dare I say, importance any more so than any other role in the company). It’s natural for that to happen when a new kind of skill set emerges on the scene; we did the same thing with web and e-commerce people in the 90s to a certain extent.
Social roles became the “rockstar” roles in companies, promising a kind of visibility and spotlight previously only reserved for publicists or prominent executives. We took marketers, communicators, and customer service people and put them visibly and actively center stage, making them a core part of the brands they were associated with.
For example, I had a very visible role as the head of social and community at Radian6 before they became part of Salesforce. It was my job to be out there, building the brand, supporting our customers, speaking at events, providing expertise at events and writing content.
But doing that kind of thing requires a keen balance.
Many companies even went out and hired a ‘name’ to lead their social efforts. And that approach was never awesome, but it’s really starting to show its weaknesses.
Me-First Isn’t Sustainable
Personally, I never forgot that while Radian6 was providing me with a great deal of opportunity to build a platform of professional expertise, my primary job was to help them build and grow an enterprise software brand and make sure that the brand was seen as the source of expertise and leadership in its field, not just me.
Social engagement made me more visible online perhaps, but that was an artifact of my work, not the focus of it.
Many people went into jobs like this thinking the opposite. That first and foremost, they needed to get seen. Get popular. Be influential. Whatever.
Now, many years into the maturity curve of social, I’m seeing a lot of people disappointed as these roles become less and less about being remarkable or special as an individual or a “personal brand” (cough), less about garnering some kind of independent fame within their industry or on the web, Â and more about being the person inside a company that can ignite a movement and make lots of other people shine.
More than once lately I’ve heard a disillusioned social media manager or community strategist confide in me, “It’s not what I thought it would be. I anticipated that I’d have a lot more visibility and freedom and that I’d be doing a lot more speaking and publishing and be more trusted to establish and guide change in my organization.”
The problem is that social within organizations is doing exactly what we’ve always wanted it to do: it’s maturing.
Which means we don’t need rockstars, we need performers. People that can further business goals within a system and build and implement strategies that fit as part of an entire organization, not just their personal agendas.
Behind The Curtain Is Critical
I think we’re in the very earliest stages of work becoming more fluid than it’s ever been before. Right now it’s starting with more distributed workforces and flatter organizations, but I think there’s even more disruption coming (like entire workforces that are purpose-built to be ad hoc, not “on staff”, based on skill sets and expertise vs. ‘roles’ in an organization, but I digress).
We talked in The Now Revolution about social becoming a skill rather than a job. A set of capabilities that every person will have, to some extent, and apply differently within an organization depending on their needs and responsibilities.
It’s already happening.
We need people who can understand social’s impact on an organization, but not just so they can be the ones to use the platforms and engage with customers online.
We need them so that they can socialize that knowledge, form key leadership teams within of centers of excellence and distribute what they know deeper and contextually inside a company so that everyone gets smarter and more immersed in social as a catalyst for better work (not necessarily the solution for it).
The social ‘superstars’ need to be the best enablers we’ve ever seen. Which means they might need to be behind the scenes, not right out in front.
These are people who are polymaths and understand the intersections of social with different corners of the company. People who are skilled in diplomacy and teaching and creating consensus, bringing lots of different people to a table to develop a unified vision and a plan to get from here to there. People who can and will do the hard work, slog through the inevitable trenches, work through the arduous process of resetting organizational memory, and sticking with the sometimes slow process of change.
This kind of talk scares the crap out of the amateurs and those drawn to this profession for the potential “stardom”, because they’re looking at the big picture and wondering where they fit. They’re worried that if they’re not the one with the obvious expertise and the visibility, that they’ll be forgotten. Invisible. Irrelevant.
Or worse yet…unnoticed and uncelebrated.
Finding Relevance in The Next Wave
If you’re a professional working in social right now, you need to think bigger. And you need to think beyond yourself.
You’ll only get so far by protecting your sandbox, worrying about who might be overstepping your job description and whether you’re the only community manager on a team. That’s role- and job-based thinking, which has strict limitations. Because once you reach the boundaries of tasks and projects, you’ve got nowhere to go.
Instead, you need to shift your mindset as a social professional to purpose-based thinking.
To remember that your purpose in your organization today is to help the entire company bridge the gap from social media to social business. In fact, you might even look at it as working yourself out of a job.
That may very well mean setting aside your own visibility in favor of making sure your knowledge and expertise gets in the hands of everyone who needs it in your company. Truth be told, the former probably happens pretty organically with the latter. But like I said before, it’s the artifact, not the focus of what you’re there to do.
This change is happening, and companies are making this shift.
The era of the superstar is giving way to the era of the enabler. The person that can help ignite and sustain this kind of transformation from within and activate others. The person who really understands the difference between being indispensable and being irreplaceable (hint: you want to be the former).
It means your job can be more important than it’s ever been, if you can handle the fact that your fame won’t come on Twitter but on the balance sheet and strategic results you help realize for your company.
That’s a pretty massive undertaking, but it’s what will legitimize social in organizations for the long term, and the professionals who understand its place in business, as well as their own.
Are you up for that challenge?
Amber – one of your best posts ever. Seriously.
Thanks, Steve. That’s a great compliment coming from you. Appreciate it.
Ditto. Really really on the mark Amber. Thank you.
Thank you, Lee!
This is excellent, spot-on stuff, Amber. I was having a conversation with someone late last week, and they said something to the effect of “Aren’t you worried about just being known as ‘the Facebook person?'” That’s thinking small.
From my perspective, I’m the voice of the brand to the consumer, and the voice of the consumer to the brand. That’s not a small or trivial role, and it’s certainly not a role that’s about my personal visibility. In fact, my job is largely to keep my personality out of the way of that interaction between brand and customer.
What I learn from interacting with our customers on social media is valuable for informing much bigger strategies than what goes on our Facebook page. I don’t need to own or direct those strategies, but if I hoard that information, I’m only hurting myself and my company.
A “sage/advisor” role is always backstage, behind the curtain. Social media has been dominated by “chief/kings” for l a whole nowThis is just the logical progression, as you said.
Thanks, Kat! There’s nothing trivial about these roles when they’re put in the proper context. We’ve made them about the ships (the tools and the vehicles) instead of the destinations, and that’s been a mistake. A natural one, but a mistake nonetheless.
Once we define our jobs based on what our objectives and achievements are rather than the mechanisms we used to get there, we’ll be much better off.
Great post Amber.
Thanks, Robin.
I love this and needed to read this today. Thank you!
Well then I’m glad I could help!
So timely and so spot on! Everyone needs to read this, I have always preferred to be behind the scenes and enable others and the larger good to succeed. My success comes at others being successful and the project I am working on completed and having a positive impact. Keep doing what you do!
I think it’s okay for people to want and enjoy more visible roles, so long as it isn’t at the expense of the business purpose that they’re there for. That’s really my issue; one has been sacrificed for the other, and that doesn’t do any of us any favors.
I think that’s the real risk for individuals and organizations. When people get a taste of that “fame” and continually feed it, they can lose track of their goals and purpose.
Good stuff. My post on the Death of the Social Media Strategist went viral, so maybe your GREAT POST will also shoot skyward. Of course with peeps like Steve Woodruff sayin so, I’m sure it will. Good stuff Amber.
The only reason that matters to me is if the message is one that’s valuable AND maybe helps someone rethink how they’re approaching either their role or the one they’re hiring for.
Kudos. I love this post! Yo’re right – It’s about results. And there are plenty of *rockstars* in our space who unfortunately don’t get that. Ultimately, even though hashtag social is still cool, people are figuring out it’s either got to drive revenue or improve margin. You know, like boring old business. Nothing wrong with being the rockstar behind the curtain – especially if it means you’re meeting customers and prospects on their platform of choice with interactions that are meaningful!
Thanks, Jen. I think there are more ways to quantify social’s value than just revenue and margin, especially once you get out of the marketing realm, but regardless, those leading the charge need to understand impact, not just activity.
Brilliant, truly. Part of the problem though are companies that hire people for their social connections or acumen without realizing that understanding how things actually get done in corporations is a much different skill set. You can’t just plop somebody into a huge company and say “go get em.” Inertia is the default state. And politics. And turf wars. You saw that difference yourself in your R6 experience vs. your Salesforce experience, I presume. That’s why the best social change agents are typically those that come from the existing ranks….they know where the skeletons are buried, and how to unearth them.
Quite true re: how to work inside of corporations vs. just a social skill set. Though I’m not sure I always believe that the best change agents come from within the ranks. There’s upsides and downsides to that, and I’ve seen it work pretty compellingly both ways depending on the organization. As for me, I’ve worked in a pretty broad swath of companies over the years and the skills I’ve been most grateful to gather have had little to do with social and everything to do with business fundamentals.
It’s not so much “social business” but business with social.
Thanks for writing this. This is one of the most honest pieces I’ve read on social in quite a while. I think you have it right when you call out that companies need people willing to get their hands dirty and help everyone else be successful. In my experience, the biggest challenge is how organizations define objectives for that role.
Thanks, Greg. The real work is crossing the bridge from where a business is today to where they want to be tomorrow. Getting there is often hard, and messy, and it means that people have to dig in and do the hard stuff. As for objectives for these kinds of roles…stay tuned. Posts coming on that very topic. 🙂
Thanks for sharing your perspective on this. For years working inside large corporations pushing for change and seeing the “rockstars”, I wondered if I was missing something. I had leadership that wanted me to hire the person with the most followers, etc and it was a constant battle. I need people that can connect the opportunities presented by social and merrier them with our business objectives. Those folks are few and far between!
I long for the day that social isn’t a separate part of the organization but who we are as a company.
Nah, you’re not missing anything, though I suspect you knew that. It can just be frustrating watching and hearing people get swept up in people and activities that are flashy. But you’ve got it right, and I’m with you. I’m eager for the day when social stops being an ancillary concept and is simply a fundamental approach to a business model. I think we’ve got our work cut out for us. 🙂
Amen, Trish!
Great post, Amber.
Thanks, Courtney. Appreciate it.
“It’s maturing.” Very true. It’s also a JOB. : )
I think many folks have very unrealistic expectations when it comes to glamour and social media. It is still a job in a political organization. It is still a company with expectations that you will be a team contributor, not a star on the speaking circuit. The personal brand is subsumed for the greater good or you will probably be attacked as a diva or whatever the man word for diva is. Divan? No I don;t think that is it.
You also have me thinking about the opposite situation. Why don;t more companies hire established rock stars? The Scoble – Rackspace model. Seems like in the age of influence this provides an instant pipeline and cred as long as they behave and not make a video of themselves in the shower with google glasses or something.
LOLOLOL. I seriously let out a big, roaring laugh. Best comment ever.
I think more companies don’t do that precisely because of the perceived risks it carries, and the tacit understanding of the diva syndrome we’re talking about. Businesses take one look at someone who might be in it for themselves more than they are the company, and chalk them up to someone that not only won’t contribute at depth, but who won’t be loyal and who will chase the next offer in a heartbeat. Which is really no different than the rockstar sales reps of days past, now they’re just leveraging the rolodex in a different way.
I think there are progressive companies that will and do look to people with industry and category influence, but social already sets off alarm bells with most organizations, and adding a visible person to the mix to head that up complicates matters. I also think a lot of orgs like the idea of ‘home growing’ their talent in social roles so they get to ensure that it fits with their existing ethos.
Not to say that won’t change or couldn’t, but … well… shower pictures. (Though there are certainly some companies wishing they had EXACTLY that kind of thing going on right now).
What would be the Return on Influence of that, Mark? 😉
Quite high if means I make money on the deal. : )
Scoble in the shower will torment me for decades…
Hey Amber. You have more rockstar opportunities: content marketing, mobile, #socbiz or do like Brian: reinvent digital experiences and touchpoints and call it the next shift from social. All kidding aside (not really): you know how it is with rockstars. I prefer people like you who think and look at the bigger picture, starting from those tiny little detail some rockstars forgot: 1) customers a.k.a. people who are about much more than social and 2) businesses a.k.a. people who work in slightly different circumstances and processes than the next happy shiny organizational graph wants us to make buy reports. Imagine the CEO: “what you sold me social media and now you want me to be a publisher, get out you moron, I’m expanding to China, you little creep”. Keep on rocking. PS: can you call me a rockstar for once, pleeeeeaaassseee 😉 Love the post.
You’re such a rockstar. 🙂 I want to be clear: there’s value in expertise. There is value in having talented AND visible professionals. But you said it: the big picture is what’s important, not what’s in front of our noses today. And that’s what I think we need to remember if we’re going to make social truly embedded and seamless in business like we say we want it to be. Thanks for the comment.
Sorry for the late reply. I’m still celebrating the fact someone finally called me a rockstar 😉 You’re right, Amber. Of course you are.
Love this post Amber. Agree 100%, and sharing it everywhere.
So while agree with you, the question remains: When will the businesses out there understand who/what they need to hire in the first place? You say the companies are making the shift now, but the majority I see are still stuck in their old ways and not budging. And if they are budging, the job listings are ridiculous… if not laughable.
A lot of companies look to pay crap for this very important role. They still try to just hire out interns and call it good. Though no one in their right mind would hire an on staff accountant intern to run the books.
While myself, and many others are up to the challenge, it is time for a lot of companies to wake up. Companies need to stop looking at social as a risk, and as an investment. Invest in the right talent, and from the top down embrace social, content etc. Allow this person (the new non-rockstar) you speak of to actually teach and deploy strategies that work, and make social become part of a companies culture.
While the Superstar/Ninja/Gurus should to be put to pasture, the architects must be allowed to rise.
Thanks for the awesome post.
Doc
I think businesses are starting to understand who they need. And frankly, there are some core characteristics, but I think the actual shape of these professionals looks different from company to company. Some may have the talent inside their orgs that they can tap and develop. Some may need to look outside.
The trickiest part is that I believe in order to be *truly* effective, these roles need to be centralized and reach beyond departmental boundaries, and historically the only roles that have done that are the CEO, HR, and IT. Social should be a layer, which means you need it to pervade each area of the business, and it’s hard to do that when you park it in one department over another.
The challenge is in viewing the role as a strategic one, not as a tactical one. And that’s something that some companies are doing, but it’s going to take time for it to become standard practice.
Fantastic post, Amber!
I love this and think it really needed to be said.
Like you, people seem to know who I am in the social media space, but this is mainly only because of the role I play at my company. I came here to help make the company I work for better (both in-house and in the social arena). I always put that first. If people know me because of that, then I hope that more reflects on my company than on me. Like you said, this is just an artifact of my job.
And, like you said, my role is now shifting. I’m still doing what I’ve always done, but now as more people from within our organization start to get involved and realize the power of social media, I’m here to help teach and support them. Not to try and out-do them for my own personal gain.
People think that my job consists of me talking to people like you on Twitter all day and getting free things from companies. They don’t understand the hard work that I put in behind the scenes at all hours of the day to make my company (and not myself) look awesome. (Although, if I do say so myself, I do look awesome anyways without any effort). People always say “I want your job,” but when they realize what I actually do, they quickly change their minds. They want the public side of what I do, but not all the stuff that goes on behind the scenes to make that public part look as good as it does.
My job has been and always will be to make the company I work for shine in the social arena. By any means necessary. That’s it. So it doesn’t matter if I get seen or our CEO or one of our awesome sales people. We’re all working towards the goal of making our company awesome both in and outside of social.
Sorry for the gigantic comment. I just got going as I was reading this.
Cheers,
Sheldon, community manager for Marketwired
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it many more times. The ones that will thrive in the long term are the ones who can adapt. That goes for individuals as well as companies. It’s not just about how much work you put in, it’s all about where you direct your efforts.
Oh my goodness. This is some spot on blogging right here. Great message: be a rockstar at doing your job first!
Christopher, I think people forget that it’s a JOB sometimes. We’ve gotten so blinded by the flash, and our focus needs to be on impact, not activity.
Love the post, Amber. As always, your thoughts have sparked a lot of conversation.
For a long time, many folks in the social media industry positioned their individual networks and influence as a “value-added feature” to any company that would hire them. It was less about what they accomplished inside organizations and more about “I spoke there,” “I was quoted here” or “I can tweet about our product/service and X number of people will see it.” This sort of mentality still runs rampant today. It won’t go away anytime soon.
I don’t think there is a simple fix here, but I do feel like a social media renaissance is not too far away. Companies will get better at understanding general best practices and holding social media folks accountable. The social media pros will improve the way they communicate regarding outcomes and organizational impact. The industry as a whole will do a better job of calling “bullshit” when they see it.
Maybe the death of the social media superstar will signal this new period of enlightenment?
I look at it this way: The honeymoon phase is coming to an end. If you work in social media, now is the time to capture and clearly articulate how you help your respective organizations/clients get to the next level. You’ll be better positioned (and protected) when these shifts start to take place.
This is a pretty typical maturity cycle for organizations, it’s not really anything new. It was once the sales people who would (and still do) get hired for who they know as much as what they know. Or the PR people who had the media contacts.
The reality is that companies want people who can bring positive visibility to the business, and that’s a good and healthy thing. The distinction is what I mentioned above: getting that as a RESULT of doing strong and valuable work in the first place, not having the notoriety be the focus of the investment. It’s a subtle distinction, but it’s an important one.
The honeymoon phase always does come to an end, the question is how well we handle the transition and what we do next. The opportunity is really big for us to do something meaningful and that’s what I want.
Thank you for writing this. Soooo needed.
Glad that we can stop asking rock stars for business advice.
Some rockstars have awesome business advice. Some don’t. I don’t ever throw the baby out with the bathwater and say that rockstars and popular professionals have nothing to add (not to mention how hypocritical that would be and how that would be insulting my own work along the way).
The point isn’t that rockstars are bad. It’s that focusing on perception vs. impact isn’t where the value is for today’s professionals, or the ones that will make the most difference tomorrow.
Disqus needs a “star” button. Great post, great responses in the comment threads.
Good riddance, I say! We clean up more rock star crap than the downtown LA IHOP. Great post.
Yeah, that’s another sign of a maturing market. Lots of people ran in early, and now the cream is starting to rise to the top by way of bad investments and inexperienced professionals being a bit more exposed. The rubber is starting to hit the road and lots of companies are going to have to take a few steps back to reset before they can effectively move forward with a more scalable strategy.
Intelligent, thought provoking, spot on analysis. It has all been said in the comments above. Amber thanks for always challenging us to think.
Thanks, Rick. Very much appreciate that.
Anybody can learn to send a tweet or post on Facebook. A great community manager is one, who can think bigger and provide overall strategies that impact key business goals. This includes teaching and enabling key players throughout the company how to utilize social media effectively.
I want to challenge you to think even bigger than that. It’s not just about teaching people how to use social media. It’s uncovering and pointing out the challenges and opportunities that are *caused* by social media. In other words, if you’re wildly successful doing social media “stuff”, what could that mean for your organization as a whole? If we can get social professionals to spark THAT kind of perspective shift in organizations rather than just what the tools are capable of, THAT would really be something indeed.
Thomas Paine is credited with having said, “Lead, follow or get out of the way.” I like your “leader as enabler” model — helping build the community’s inertia and then getting out of its way. If it needs a boost or a course correction, give it a gentle push, rather than a pull. By refusing to leave the forefront, you might well become an impediment.
Great post, Amber.
I think the best leaders are always enablers. They’re the ones who create the conditions for success. I like your “build inertia and get out of the way” statement. And for the love of Pete, get in and contribute, too. This kind of shift is going to take help from everyone we can get in organizations today. It’s a big one.
OK, yes… let’s do it for Pete’s sake. Wait — who’s Pete?
FABULOUS STUFF. It’s easy to measure success based on superficial social media metrics. It’s much more difficult to use complex indicators of success to demonstrate ROI for social media. Many senior execs who think themselves social media savvy will ask for traditional indicator numbers, too. I think that’s why many PR practitioners still focus energy on maintaining the traditional indicators of sm success including follower count, Klout score (I know – cringe!), engagement via Twitter, etc.
I think building trust with senior execs is supremely important when measuring social media. The execs need to know that you know what you’re doing and trust your measurement or you’ll be caught up justifying every change and wasting valuable time explaining new possibilities.
What execs listen to is hearing how social initiatives support business objectives. The reason we stick with easy metrics that are more about activity than impact is because they’re readily available, they’re easy to put on a graph, quick to understand. But if you really want to get the attention of an exec, start connecting the dots between a more collaborative organization and reduced talent turnover. Or talk about reduced spend in R&D or shorter development times thanks to better communication between product teams.
ROI shouldn’t be attached to the medium (social), it should be attached to the outcome (customer service). That’s where most of these discussions go totally sideways.
Thanks nailing it on so many levels and elegantly stating what pros marketing our brands vs ourselves, have been thinking since day one. This is a must read for all new grads / people looking to transition into ‘social media’.
It’s easy to get swept up in the validation that comes with being popular, recognized, or seen. And those things can have value for an organization. When the value isn’t mutual, however, is when the issues start to arise.
I’ve been so jaded towards social in the past year or so and I think you nailed what I’ve been going through personally in my chosen profession, Amber. I hope that this post gets lots of reads and people take it to heart/practice. Great stuff.
Thanks, Stacey. You aren’t alone in those feelings. I think it’s the settling and maturing that’s doing it. The hype and the noise is dying down, and we’re looking for the substance. It’s there for the people who want to find it.
Where to start? Well, amazing post. That’s where.
You and others saw earlier than most that the business underpinnings were being lost in the fray. People were somehow mistaking “tweet a lot” for a business tactic. That SideraWorks (which means you and Matt) jumped in to say “hey wait! There’s a lot more that needs doing here,” is a really important part of the story of the evolution.
Recently, a well-meaning person asked if she could barter a ticket to an upcoming event of mine in exchange for tweeting and blogging to promote the event. It was one of the first times that the absurdity of how little effect that would have slapped me so hard in the face.
In my own shifts (business in this case), I rearranged the order of operations a bit and went closer to my 2006 position, which was that this new media stuff is neato (now evidently named content marketing). And even then, I love that graphic that’s floating around about a plumber pushing his free ebook. The tool isn’t for every job.
Anyway, long winded reply to say, hey wow!
You mean tweeting every 22.65 seconds isn’t how to be an influencer? Come on.. 😛
Thanks, Chris. I can’t say that I’ve always seen the forest for the trees. I’ve had my own moments early on of being enamored of the fact that anyone was reading my writing, or reading a book I wrote. It’s easy to do, and I’m sure I’m just as guilty as the next person.
But for anyone who’s spent any time in a corporate career, you realize that the meat of the work is behind the curtain. And as much as it can feel nice for someone to be excited for a talk I’m going to give, I much prefer the feeling that comes after a killer client meeting when they’re absolutely elated about the impact we’re going to make on their business. THAT’s what drives me.
The problem is that we have a hard time acknowledging the evolution that happens, to both people and companies. It’s OKAY to have ridden the crazy wave of early social; in fact, you could make lots of arguments about why that’s exactly what was needed at the time. Now, the needs are changing, and we have to adapt. And that’s also okay. What we need is to stop caring what people were doing two years ago and instead focus on how we individually and collectively are going to help our industry move FORWARD to where it needs to be.
So I guess that’s a long winded reply to your reply to say: Thanks.
Thank you. Well observed. Â Working yourself out of a job is what great professionals do, like medical doctors. Â
Or, applied to a company vision and mission, a great one is when the organization reaches that, it will not be needed any more.Â
That’s the way I look at it.
Because frankly, the most valuable professionals aren’t amazing because of what they do. They’re amazing because of their ability to take methods they’ve learned and apply them consistently in new situations to solve new problems.
There’s always a role for that.
Wow Amber, this is so bang on. Help a company hit it’s business objectives/KPIs and your reputation will follow, not vice versa. Love the phrase ‘Me-First Isn’t Sustainable’ – can I borrow it for my deck on recruiting for SM? Full cred of course.
Great post and thanks.
Thanks, Gregg. You’ve got it. And sure, use whatever you like, attribution appreiciated.Thanks!
Thank goodness I came across this post. For awhile there I thought I was the only one thinking this way, and it was causing me some concern. Thank you for speaking up and bringing this important but often avoided conversation to the forefront.
Oh hell no you’re not alone. And you’re a fantastic example of someone who has always seen why this is important. I know we’ve talked about it before, in fact. Keep doing what you’re doing, Dave. You’ve got an awful lot to contribute to your company and the industry as a whole, and I’m glad you’re on our side!
Excellent post Amber. You have a great ability to write what I am thinking in a way that makes sense. I am happy to see the pendulum swing towards the place it is needed and you put it succinctly here.
Thanks, Karin. I always think a maturing market is SO exciting. Feeling the shift, seeing the changes, solving new puzzles…I guess there’s a reason I love the work I do. It’s more science and discovery than engineering. And I think that’s awesome.
So many great takeaways and illustrations on the way social business is changing organizations and the people who work in social roles. Sad, that many in social business roles are focused on building their own platform when the promise and reality of social is all about community. Thanks for making the case Amber.
There will always be (and always have been) people who put themselves first, always. It’s not new, we just have all sorts of ways to make that visible now and watch it as it happens more than ever before. Business has *always* been about community, too. The mechanisms are different, the philosophy is not.
We just need to get back to, uh, brass tacks. 🙂
Every employee has to tie their work to the company’s revenue stream. And that’s a huge problem for people who defined their role in social since it is incredibly difficult to prove a tangible ROI. The ugly truth.
Hmmm. I’m not at all sure I agree with that statement. Every employee has to show their role’s *value*, which can and does ultimately end in a revenue stream (or cost savings) but it doesn’t always tie in a direct line to either.
As for the social ROI discussion, that’s much too much to tackle here, but the ROI is found in the objectives that social supports (like customer satisfaction or brand visibility or organizational culture development), not in the social mediums and activities themselves. But ROI is absolutely provable, as are many success metrics that influence revenue but don’t directly drive it.
Great post, Amber.
Where I diverge in my opinion is that every company is different. There are some instances where you absolutely need to have one voice and face for the company, and so, by default, the “Rockstar”. I worked for a company where we had staff going off on customers, throwing colleagues under the bus or giving out incorrect information. To be consistent and make sure the proper messages were being delivered across all platforms (SM, blogs, discussion forums), we had no choice but to assign one individual and severely restrict the rest of the team. We had to rebuild the trust of the community, they needed to know that this was the person to listen to and to believe. However, in this type of situation, it’s even MORE critical that the “rockstar” remember to focus on improving the company image, not their own.
Granted it’s probably a one-off situation but the point is that every company is different, it’s important to adapt your role so you can deliver exactly what they need.
I’ll always agree that every company is different. In fact, I would be a really crappy consultant if I didn’t know that.
That doesn’t mean that the principles don’t still apply in general, but need to be implemented in context. That’s no different than any other general business “theory”. How it looks in every company might be different, but the desired outcome is still the same.
Great post. The out-front people were the mavericks who created the necessary awareness for engagement, and they succeeded. Now we’re in the era of operationalizing that work.
Most definitely, which I actually find fascinating. And I love that you pointed out that the awareness was necessary, because it was (and still is). It’s always about the balance.
Great post! and I see (and have seen) a lot of these things in my career trajectory. Early on, I was one of those bloggers hired to be a “voice”–only later to find out my voice, the one I got hired to use, wasn’t what the company wanted. I later found out that I wasn’t the only one that this sort of thing happened to. Mostly because companies really didn’t know nor understand what social was all about….
Now, though, as the field has matured, I find it’s more my expertise in things like copyright, fair use, SEC regulations, FTC and FCC regulations, First Amendment and citizen journalism/self-publishing are what makes me worthwhile to a company or endeavor (usually a start-up.) As well as how I can interpret analytics and give the company “social media person” the confidence to engage and convert. It’s not *me* that makes it happen but empowering others for *their* company. I like that role a heck of a lot better than being the rockstar.
Trish, how interesting how your role has evolved, and how great! And it sounds like you’ve got just the right balance between doing and teaching, and ultimately that’s an incredibly valuable asset to any organization. Good for you, and good for your organization for understanding that and adapting their investment accordingly.
Fantastic post Amber. Change is in the air. Kudos!
Indeed! I love it. Thank you.
Amber – a vitally important perspective. There are a lot of people in businesses who “get” social now. Even four years ago, that wasn’t nearly as true. It’s quite similar to being an expert in internal communications — ideally, you’d work yourself out of a job; the culture and practice of communication within an organization would improve so much that you didn’t need anyone to foster it, to champion it. Social is maturing past the marketing and PR flags, it’s becoming something that people just do. So, if it happens that we missed our big chance to bill $22,000 a day to talk social, so be it.
Thanks, Sean. We absolutely needed the emergent phase of social just like any other shift in business. But I like your parallel to internal comms. Ideally we wouldn’t need centralized expertise. The reality is that we probably always will, but it’ll be about always pursuing that goal. Social practitioners need to evolve with their discipline and the parallel needs of business. Again, not a new concept, just a new context.
First thing I have read by you, but wanted to thank you for the fresh and vitally important perspective you have shared here…
Thanks so much, Ralph, and hope to see you here again.
Well written Amber. Loved it.
Thanks, Patrick!
Amber,
I think we have to remember, that we are more than our social media celebrity, and in fact we are here to do a job, whatever that may be. I work in an industry that is relatively slow to adopt social media and technology. That is HR. We are 24 months or more behind the curve of adjusting, integrating and understanding the technology and how it can be used in companies whether recruiting, employee engagement for for employment branding. We are just beginning to this trend emerge in my space and its exhausting.
People are more than their social media celebrity and those that share knowledge, learning and training are the true innovators and leaders in the space. You have to go beyond social media to be strategic, global and effective for the long term.
Jessica
Absolutely. And I personally believe HR really has the opportunity to be quite a catalyst for change in this realm if they’re willing to look beyond just technology and recruiting and start thinking about org culture development and even organizational design. There’s a lot of shift that will happen there and I think HR can play a critical role.
Your post captured things perfectly, well done and well stated!
Thank you, Adam.
It’s been awhile since I’ve commented on a blog post, let alone yours Amber. it’s weird how in a prodigal type of way that I found myself to this post. You’re right and i think everyone who has commented here feels the same way. The space has matured and those of us who are in it for the long haul want to be known as much for the great work we do for companies NOW and the results that it will reap as we did back then for being the first ones who used twitter, the first who had a popular blog, the first ones who said, “Hey Plurk is interesting…” OK maybe we didn’t say that but…
Nevertheless the point is that those here who commented are probably not the ones really making a living on showing people how to use twitter as much as they are those who are saying, “By using these tools and platforms across the enterprise, and by measuring the right things, here’s what you can expect and here are the results and here is the value.” A whole lot different than saying, “Here’s how to grow your followers….” I’m glad I stopped by. Hope you’re well since i havent talked to you in like 2-3 years! 🙂
Hey now, I loved Plurk. 🙂
I actually see and hear a lot more of the disciplined pros than the industry gets credit for. There are some vocal narcissists that I think color the perception overall, but I’m encouraged by who and what I’m seeing behind the scenes in lots of different organizations. The hype cycle never fully corrects itself, but it does settle down and the maturity of an industry always manages to weed out the opportunists, or at least keep most of them out of the way.
Nice to see you.
Good post Amber.
It is in line with my thinking when responding to Chris Brogan’s post earlier, as well. The luxury of spending time, dare I say ‘playing’ in some cases, in the innumerable social platforms, is one allowed to a very privileged few.
Which network one spends time on, doesn’t matter on which network they like, rather which network their customers are on. At the end of the day, whether you’re a social media manager, assembly worker, or executive, there are only two reasons we are employed. We help with Productivity, Revenue, or both. If your efforts don’t contribute, if you can’t show how they do, you’re certainly not on the ‘indispensable’ list.
I think there are a lot more ways to ascribe value to contributions, but I take your point.
And I don’t think spending time learning is a luxury, it’s a necessary investment. How else would we come to understand where the value is and isn’t? We all do it to some extent in our jobs, whether they have to do with social or not.
I alluded to this above and it comes from a TED talk that Matt Ridings pointed me to. The phase we’ve been in with social has been a lot about the discovery and the understanding and the science of grasping something new.
We’re gradually moving toward doing that in parallel with engineering, or designing the processes and systems that will support it in practice. Neither are more valuable, they’re just different disciplines. And the pros that want a future in this element need to understand a bit of both.
Holy hell I’m a year ahead of the curve again! Sheesh. I need to stop thinking myself a weirdo. Excellent post!
Thanks for the compliment.
Wow. Just wow. You nailed it Amber. I couldn’t agree more that it is indeed time to move past the social rockstar mentality and onto smarter integrated marketing. I don’t plan on having social in my title for the long run but it has paved the way for me to be a very well rounded marketer. That’s what we should all strive to be at the end of the day. Better marketers provide better marketing, and that’s good for everyone.
It’s not just marketing, though I understand that’s the lens that’s relevant to you.
Social applies to marketing. It also applies to HR, to customer affairs, to IT, to organizational culture, to partner relations, to investor relations, to R&D and product and sales.
The challenge is learning to separate the concepts from the applications, and learning to connect the dots between business objectives and ALL of the methods we use to get there. Social is much more of a catalyst for these changes than it is a solution in itself.
As I was reading your article, I kept being reminded of Frank Eliason who came to our attention as the voice, the person behind @comcastcares. He had it totally right from the beginning, never forgetting his role, mission, and purpose. The grace in the way he functioned spoke volumes for Comcast and then, for Frank.
I think he’s the ultimate role model for anyone aspiring to a social media role in a corporate environment. We can all learn from his example.
Frank’s a good guy and a good friend. And he definitely understands how important it is to be able to tie social to a larger business impact, and that makes him a super valuable person to have on your team. Citi is lucky to have him!
Good article Amber! I think the actually users (customers) are the real social media superstars. The customer tends to know more about the social platforms and how to use them. Key point for me here is … social media is just a new form of marketing and reaching your audience. Every single CMO, Marketing person just needs to add this “social media” skill to their list and understand a new form of digital marketing. Leaders of companies need to be apart of this enabling process or identify the intrapreneur who can make it happen. Great read! Thanks for sharing
Weeeeelll….I’d go way beyond “social is just a new form of marketing”. But in the context of marketing alone, yes, it’s a new discipline that needs to be integrated with the rest and approached from a holistic perspective, not just one that looks at how you use the tools. They’ll always change, anyway.
Great article Amber!
Finally we are witnessing the maturity of social within companies and finally we can focus the conversation on what social can mean for organizations (both profit and non-profit).
We are getting ready for the next step, i.e.: community development around projects that matter. As an organizational change practitioner I have been waiting for this moment.
To the same extent I have been frustrated by the rock-stars and popularity-score-systems because they have inhibited for a long time what our organizations need to desperately: communities that make good use of the social media tools in order to cross the silos. It’s time for the real work: building social architectures.
Thanks again for the article and for the space you are holding in these very comments.
Luc
The issue I have with most of the popularity metrics and systems is that they distract from the real value behind social (and there is lots). They’re easy and visible, so we gravitate to them, but they’re not really meaningful.
I like the idea of social architectures. We talk a lot about frameworks in our work. Same idea. Building the systems and structure that will help social thrive as an ethos, not just a set of tools and activities.
I’m currently diving deeper into social architecture (got into the finals of the MiX leadership challenge with that last year) and how we can apply it on organizations.
I’m discovering that community development lies at the core.
I found Peter Block’s book ‘Community, The Structure of Belonging’ particularly helpful in that context (although Peter Block is not at all into digital communities – and then again, this may be the very reason he is able to distill the essence of community).
So true, Amber. Well said.
Thanks, Dave.
Holy hell this makes my head hurt! And will piss many off.. Love it..
I don’t know if pissing people off is the right metric for success here, but glad you liked the post (I think you were saying your head hurt in a good way?).
Great post, Amber and you really nailed the social rockstar phenomenon. I’ve seen too many examples of people that no one heard of, put into a lead social role at a big brand and use their title to justify their righteous behaviors. Often times, there’s nothing on their resume to back that attitude up, yet they throw it around like it’s their right. I’ve actually heard one of these social rocks stars say “I’m head of social at xyz, I can do anything… just because”.
The real social stars are those within an organization that are making things happen everyday. They’re enabling and empowering employees, finding new ways to integrate social technology and the insights gathered into the business and making impact. They may not be the head of social and we may not know their name because they’re workin’ it – for the brand or company they work for, not their own.
I think it’s important to point out again that jackasses exist in all disciplines. There are always people who will take advantage of their position, or fight for themselves first, or justify poor behavior. That’s a personality and character flaw, not the fault of social.
However, social gives people like that a stage and a spotlight more so than it ever has. So we can see it more readily.
But your point is correct: the real work is taking place inside of organizations. What matters is what you can DO with what you know, not how loudly you can preach it (irony noted).
I agree with your post 100%, Amber. This is one reason why, while most people might not know who I am, my clients rehire and refer me. I’m good with that (although, for purely selfish reasons, I would like the #BaldIsBeautiful hash tag to trend some day). 🙂
Haha! That’s awesome. The fact that your clients rehire and refer you is more important than anything else. Regardless of what changes, that will forever be the thing that makes the business world go round.
I don’t know what speaks better of you: The amazing insightfulness of the post or the way you create interaction and input from other people here in the comments. Reading your posts is always a long time task because it is not only the text but all the comments that give so much great food thought! congrats on all that.
not much to say about all this, the other great thinkers before me have said it. I can only sigh from my LATAM vision where reading this post makes me realize that LATAM is farther behind in strategy and vision about social business than what we think.
It is not only rockstars over here, but as you say at the beginning: We created the idea on a lot of them that they have the magic keys of business in their hands and that nobody else in the company “gets it”. Thus now we have not only rockstars who love the attention but also a lot of people who almost think they should be running the company and guiding it because THEY know the customer, they engage with him and cause the “old guy” doesn’t understand that ROI is not important and all that b.s.
The first “experts” created them, with their quickbuck trainings that told them they were the greatest, even if they were only trainees or entry level guys. I’ve found a lot of CMs here in Mexico who actually have NO aspirations of getting higher in the company or doing other things, they actually think that being the CM is the ultimate position, and while i may agree in some degree… come on!
anyways… great post and hope to see you soon!
I thank you for the kind words, as always. I take zero credit for anything other than raising the topic. The conversation is created by the people here in the comments.
Social business concepts are slowly but surely making their way into companies, and we’re actually talking to a few orgs in Mexico and Brazil right now that are very much on board with it. So it’s out there, it just takes time. And we’re hoping to bring some of that to the LATAM market, actually, because we see lots of potential there.
Awesome,
That sounds great and hope you can someday share or convince some of those companies to come forward as flagships of the social business change in the region, we really need case studies and examples that act as starters.
And would love to see a SideraWorks office in Mexico 😉 hey! would love to be part of it! 😉 let me know!
Very nice job with this post Amber. It’s thoughtful, self-aware and constructive. Really, good work. When I left a relatively high profile job running content / social for Eloqua, fresh off an IPO, to join a relatively unknown start-up, a number of people (most in fact) thought the move was crazy. Maybe it was. Time will tell. But I was betting on exactly what you say in this post: the longest career will go to those who make a meaningful difference for the business, not those with the highest “influencer score.” Said another way, never go long on a trend. -Joe
The crazy moves are the ones that define you, Joe. And they’re almost always worthwhile in some way or another. I had a successful independent firm when I took my job with this little Canadian startup back in 2008…. I was crazy, too. And I was crazy again when I LEFT Salesforce after the acquisition to risk it all and start my own firm, again.
The trick here is that there are trends AND an undercurrent of substance that really will matter in the long run. I’m incredibly confident of that. Whether we always call it social business? I doubt that. But the shift and the change is real, and impact never goes out of style. Keep it up!
The “Superstars” work for themselves usually because who’s going to continuously pay someone $425/hr?
Lots of companies who have had agencies, consultancies, and outside experts like lawyers on their payrolls for years. There is *always* a market for adding business value, and a premium one at that.
I think this is a generalization that’s aiming at the wrong problem, and I know plenty of superstars working in organizations, too.
The question isn’t charging the rate, it’s proving that you’re delivering more than that in value. That’s always what separates the opportunists from the investors.
Interesting read, it looks like a lot of folks are watching this scenario play out in real time. Thanks!
It’s definitely happening in real-time, that’s for sure! Quickly.
Amber, I cannot tell you how much this speaks to me. You have articulated what I’ve been sensing, and certainly live every day now. Thank you for putting this out there!
Great post. Thanks!
This is a very crafty piece, it is obvious to me you are an excellent writer, communicator, as well as an innovative thinker, however rock stars are in the spotlight and play in bands, usually make millions and produce something their fans die for. Did I miss something, or did someone actually get famous simply by using social media? Hey look there’s that Twitter guy! The problem is the notion that you can take social media, which was never really designed to be used as a business tool, in the first place and simply use it as a one size fits all. The fact of the matter is corporate starting using these platforms, I think because of the obvious reason, there are over a billion people there, but also for reputation management, to remain in the driver seat, and to stay current with something potentially very disruptive. And oh boy has it been right! Another thing social media does is intertwine personal feelings and opinions into a new form of marketing which is muddying the waters. I believe they are personal media tools, but it’s not cool enough, I mean if you named this piece “The Begrudging Death of The Personal Media Superstar” that would not have been nearly as cool. It’s all smoke and mirrors, The real players and people who get ahead in life and in business are hard working. No matter if they are rock stars, or communications specialists. There is no magic formula for success really, you cannot bottle it and sell it. I may personally hate a company, you or your brand, but my friend may like it and vice verse. You may be right, I may be crazy, but it just may be a lunatic your looking for, (sorry little levity) Billy Joel popped in there. No but seriously, as the smoke settles and personal media does mature, people are going to expect companies to use the tools to meet their needs and if not they will simply do business else ware. I think so, but nice insightful post Amber. I poured my soul into this comment. I apologize in advance for it being a little lengthy. You certainly got my attention.
Great advice! It’s important for marketers to focus on the strategy and tactics that work. Thanks for sharing.
When I was a community organizer, we used to say that a great community organizer NEVER EVER spoke to the press. A great organizer stayed behind the scenes and encouraged community leaders to take the credit and share their stories. Same with a great social media community manager, strategist, and employee at a company.
I hate the terms “rock star, guru, and expert.” Seriously – those people just die out in blazes of glory or fade into the ether.
Great post, Amber.
With the greatest possible respect to the author, the article confuses social media oriented roles with that of a brand ambassador.
Anyone with any real knowledge of the social media landscape already knows that social media executives are firmly entrenched in the background, and rarely venture out into the field. Close links are formed with the SEO, working on ways where organic brand awareness can be achieved.
I don’t dispute that the role of the brand ambassador or community engagement officer will go through a transition, but that was never questioned.
Anyway, whilst I don’t agree, it’s certainly a well written piece.
Good thing that you shared this kind of information.
This is a nice post in an interesting line of content.Thanks for sharing this article.
Heya i’m for the primary time here. I came across this board and I to find It
truly useful & it helped me out a lot. I am hoping to provide onne thing back and
help others like youu aided me.