I’m not sure what’s in the water, but there’s a general unrest right now with people in their jobs, careers, and industries. Especially people whose roles involve social, either officially or unofficially.
Actually, scratch that. I know exactly what’s in the water. Or at least part of it.
When it comes to roles that involve social media, community, or similar responsibilities, we made some mistakes in how we glorified them and set the expectations around their role (and dare I say, importance any more so than any other role in the company). It’s natural for that to happen when a new kind of skill set emerges on the scene; we did the same thing with web and e-commerce people in the 90s to a certain extent.
Social roles became the “rockstar” roles in companies, promising a kind of visibility and spotlight previously only reserved for publicists or prominent executives. We took marketers, communicators, and customer service people and put them visibly and actively center stage, making them a core part of the brands they were associated with.
For example, I had a very visible role as the head of social and community at Radian6 before they became part of Salesforce. It was my job to be out there, building the brand, supporting our customers, speaking at events, providing expertise at events and writing content.
But doing that kind of thing requires a keen balance.
Many companies even went out and hired a ‘name’ to lead their social efforts. And that approach was never awesome, but it’s really starting to show its weaknesses.
Me-First Isn’t Sustainable
Personally, I never forgot that while Radian6 was providing me with a great deal of opportunity to build a platform of professional expertise, my primary job was to help them build and grow an enterprise software brand and make sure that the brand was seen as the source of expertise and leadership in its field, not just me.
Social engagement made me more visible online perhaps, but that was an artifact of my work, not the focus of it.
Many people went into jobs like this thinking the opposite. That first and foremost, they needed to get seen. Get popular. Be influential. Whatever.
Now, many years into the maturity curve of social, I’m seeing a lot of people disappointed as these roles become less and less about being remarkable or special as an individual or a “personal brand” (cough), less about garnering some kind of independent fame within their industry or on the web, and more about being the person inside a company that can ignite a movement and make lots of other people shine.
More than once lately I’ve heard a disillusioned social media manager or community strategist confide in me, “It’s not what I thought it would be. I anticipated that I’d have a lot more visibility and freedom and that I’d be doing a lot more speaking and publishing and be more trusted to establish and guide change in my organization.”
The problem is that social within organizations is doing exactly what we’ve always wanted it to do: it’s maturing.
Which means we don’t need rockstars, we need performers. People that can further business goals within a system and build and implement strategies that fit as part of an entire organization, not just their personal agendas.
Behind The Curtain Is Critical
I think we’re in the very earliest stages of work becoming more fluid than it’s ever been before. Right now it’s starting with more distributed workforces and flatter organizations, but I think there’s even more disruption coming (like entire workforces that are purpose-built to be ad hoc, not “on staff”, based on skill sets and expertise vs. ‘roles’ in an organization, but I digress).
We talked in The Now Revolution about social becoming a skill rather than a job. A set of capabilities that every person will have, to some extent, and apply differently within an organization depending on their needs and responsibilities.
It’s already happening.
We need people who can understand social’s impact on an organization, but not just so they can be the ones to use the platforms and engage with customers online.
We need them so that they can socialize that knowledge, form key leadership teams within of centers of excellence and distribute what they know deeper and contextually inside a company so that everyone gets smarter and more immersed in social as a catalyst for better work (not necessarily the solution for it).
The social ‘superstars’ need to be the best enablers we’ve ever seen. Which means they might need to be behind the scenes, not right out in front.
These are people who are polymaths and understand the intersections of social with different corners of the company. People who are skilled in diplomacy and teaching and creating consensus, bringing lots of different people to a table to develop a unified vision and a plan to get from here to there. People who can and will do the hard work, slog through the inevitable trenches, work through the arduous process of resetting organizational memory, and sticking with the sometimes slow process of change.
This kind of talk scares the crap out of the amateurs and those drawn to this profession for the potential “stardom”, because they’re looking at the big picture and wondering where they fit. They’re worried that if they’re not the one with the obvious expertise and the visibility, that they’ll be forgotten. Invisible. Irrelevant.
Or worse yet…unnoticed and uncelebrated.
Finding Relevance in The Next Wave
If you’re a professional working in social right now, you need to think bigger. And you need to think beyond yourself.
You’ll only get so far by protecting your sandbox, worrying about who might be overstepping your job description and whether you’re the only community manager on a team. That’s role- and job-based thinking, which has strict limitations. Because once you reach the boundaries of tasks and projects, you’ve got nowhere to go.
Instead, you need to shift your mindset as a social professional to purpose-based thinking.
To remember that your purpose in your organization today is to help the entire company bridge the gap from social media to social business. In fact, you might even look at it as working yourself out of a job.
That may very well mean setting aside your own visibility in favor of making sure your knowledge and expertise gets in the hands of everyone who needs it in your company. Truth be told, the former probably happens pretty organically with the latter. But like I said before, it’s the artifact, not the focus of what you’re there to do.
This change is happening, and companies are making this shift.
The era of the superstar is giving way to the era of the enabler. The person that can help ignite and sustain this kind of transformation from within and activate others. The person who really understands the difference between being indispensable and being irreplaceable (hint: you want to be the former).
It means your job can be more important than it’s ever been, if you can handle the fact that your fame won’t come on Twitter but on the balance sheet and strategic results you help realize for your company.
That’s a pretty massive undertaking, but it’s what will legitimize social in organizations for the long term, and the professionals who understand its place in business, as well as their own.
Are you up for that challenge?
Amber – one of your best posts ever. Seriously.
Thanks, Steve. That’s a great compliment coming from you. Appreciate it.
Ditto. Really really on the mark Amber. Thank you.
Thank you, Lee!
This is excellent, spot-on stuff, Amber. I was having a conversation with someone late last week, and they said something to the effect of “Aren’t you worried about just being known as ‘the Facebook person?'” That’s thinking small.
From my perspective, I’m the voice of the brand to the consumer, and the voice of the consumer to the brand. That’s not a small or trivial role, and it’s certainly not a role that’s about my personal visibility. In fact, my job is largely to keep my personality out of the way of that interaction between brand and customer.
What I learn from interacting with our customers on social media is valuable for informing much bigger strategies than what goes on our Facebook page. I don’t need to own or direct those strategies, but if I hoard that information, I’m only hurting myself and my company.
A “sage/advisor” role is always backstage, behind the curtain. Social media has been dominated by “chief/kings” for l a whole nowThis is just the logical progression, as you said.
Thanks, Kat! There’s nothing trivial about these roles when they’re put in the proper context. We’ve made them about the ships (the tools and the vehicles) instead of the destinations, and that’s been a mistake. A natural one, but a mistake nonetheless.
Once we define our jobs based on what our objectives and achievements are rather than the mechanisms we used to get there, we’ll be much better off.
Great post Amber.
Thanks, Robin.
I love this and needed to read this today. Thank you!
Well then I’m glad I could help!
So timely and so spot on! Everyone needs to read this, I have always preferred to be behind the scenes and enable others and the larger good to succeed. My success comes at others being successful and the project I am working on completed and having a positive impact. Keep doing what you do!
I think it’s okay for people to want and enjoy more visible roles, so long as it isn’t at the expense of the business purpose that they’re there for. That’s really my issue; one has been sacrificed for the other, and that doesn’t do any of us any favors.
I think that’s the real risk for individuals and organizations. When people get a taste of that “fame” and continually feed it, they can lose track of their goals and purpose.
Good stuff. My post on the Death of the Social Media Strategist went viral, so maybe your GREAT POST will also shoot skyward. Of course with peeps like Steve Woodruff sayin so, I’m sure it will. Good stuff Amber.
The only reason that matters to me is if the message is one that’s valuable AND maybe helps someone rethink how they’re approaching either their role or the one they’re hiring for.
Kudos. I love this post! Yo’re right – It’s about results. And there are plenty of *rockstars* in our space who unfortunately don’t get that. Ultimately, even though hashtag social is still cool, people are figuring out it’s either got to drive revenue or improve margin. You know, like boring old business. Nothing wrong with being the rockstar behind the curtain – especially if it means you’re meeting customers and prospects on their platform of choice with interactions that are meaningful!
Thanks, Jen. I think there are more ways to quantify social’s value than just revenue and margin, especially once you get out of the marketing realm, but regardless, those leading the charge need to understand impact, not just activity.
Brilliant, truly. Part of the problem though are companies that hire people for their social connections or acumen without realizing that understanding how things actually get done in corporations is a much different skill set. You can’t just plop somebody into a huge company and say “go get em.” Inertia is the default state. And politics. And turf wars. You saw that difference yourself in your R6 experience vs. your Salesforce experience, I presume. That’s why the best social change agents are typically those that come from the existing ranks….they know where the skeletons are buried, and how to unearth them.
Quite true re: how to work inside of corporations vs. just a social skill set. Though I’m not sure I always believe that the best change agents come from within the ranks. There’s upsides and downsides to that, and I’ve seen it work pretty compellingly both ways depending on the organization. As for me, I’ve worked in a pretty broad swath of companies over the years and the skills I’ve been most grateful to gather have had little to do with social and everything to do with business fundamentals.
It’s not so much “social business” but business with social.
Thanks for writing this. This is one of the most honest pieces I’ve read on social in quite a while. I think you have it right when you call out that companies need people willing to get their hands dirty and help everyone else be successful. In my experience, the biggest challenge is how organizations define objectives for that role.
Thanks, Greg. The real work is crossing the bridge from where a business is today to where they want to be tomorrow. Getting there is often hard, and messy, and it means that people have to dig in and do the hard stuff. As for objectives for these kinds of roles…stay tuned. Posts coming on that very topic. 🙂
Thanks for sharing your perspective on this. For years working inside large corporations pushing for change and seeing the “rockstars”, I wondered if I was missing something. I had leadership that wanted me to hire the person with the most followers, etc and it was a constant battle. I need people that can connect the opportunities presented by social and merrier them with our business objectives. Those folks are few and far between!
I long for the day that social isn’t a separate part of the organization but who we are as a company.