As I’ve said a couple of times before, my mission for now and ever is to pull back the cover on the social media engine and get greasy. I want to tinker with the moving parts and figure out how they work, and map all that out for businesses that are really trying to understand how to apply all this STUFF we keep talking about. No preaching. Real work.
Here’s some of the stuff I’ll be thinking about. Will you add yours?
Bridging Online and Off
The online world is teeming with life, but there’s still a big analog world out there. 2.0 brands are going to have to learn how to keep a foot in both universes. Up for consideration will be how offline communication in person and print can perpetuate cycles of communication, instead of being stopping points.
Can we effectively use concrete brand experiences – like tangible products, collateral, and in-person events – and bridge them back and forth to digital? How?
Building Without Walls
Flexibility is going to be key in a nimble digital world. Plans are going to be made, reworked, and all out broken. The days of the tabular marketing and communications plan are long gone. What’s next will be frameworks, scaffolding. Structure without permanence so that communicators like me (and you) can adapt and mold to the shapes that the conversations are taking online.
So what, exactly, does that plan look like? What factors need to drive our goals and objectives? That’s a big thing for us to chew on this year. I’m already doodling…
Inside Baseball
The foundation of external social media success is internal. It’s having the right mindset, the right team in place, the right resources allocated (and waiting in the wings) so that social media becomes part of the culture and operation of a business from the inside out. It just doesn’t work otherwise.
As more team members are using social networks in their personal lives, we’re going to see a gradual but distinctive bleed into business. Employees are going to expect that they can work with these tools to do their jobs better. So how do we structure the flow of information, empower and educate employees, engender trust between believers and skeptics? Are we meeting the needs of our internal clients – our bosses, our colleagues, our teams – and putting our own social media money where our mouth is? What does this mean for roles and responsibilities in tomorrow’s companies?
Information Workflow
Listening, learning, participating. All of our favorite buzzwords for social media. But from an operational business standpoint, just what are we doing with this new found wisdom? How are we adapting and evolving our operations and communications based on what we learn? Are we creating best practices and making our companies leaner and better at serving our customers, or are we preening?
The only way social media will be sustainable is to integrate the effective parts into the way we build businesses, and jettison the crap that weighs us down. Critical issues to think on will be how information flows through the business and exactly how those touchpoints affect day to day work.
You’ll note that there’s not a thing above that’s specific to using blogs or Twitter or Facebook advertising or RSS or anything else. The reason is simple: the tools come last (or close to last), only after figuring out what, exactly, we’re trying to accomplish. I’m going to keep thinking about the tools themselves, but from the angles of how they plug into the pieces above. Not for their own sake.
The questions above may be masquerading a bit as theory, but there will be no answers without practical application. And the answers are going to be different for each and every company. So I’m sketching blueprints right now. You’ll see them this year, because together, we’re going to figure out what works.
So you’re going to work every day, trying to assimilate this stuff. What should people like me be keeping in mind for people like you? What do *you* need on these blueprints so that you can take them to work with you and start building?
Well, my theory is, if everything is becoming social media, and we’re supposedly shortly to evolve further to Web 3.0, that we might want to rethink what we mean when we say social media.
You said it yourself that you’re playing both sides, therefore it follows that others are as well.
I’ll leave it up to you figure what that means….
Well, my theory is, if everything is becoming social media, and we’re supposedly shortly to evolve further to Web 3.0, that we might want to rethink what we mean when we say social media.
You said it yourself that you’re playing both sides, therefore it follows that others are as well.
I’ll leave it up to you figure what that means….
@Matches I agree, “social media” as we know it right now is evolving drastically and will continue to. The tools may stay the same, improve, or change all together. The practices behind it as well might.
@Amber I like how you say nothing involving specific tools. Because in the end they are just “tools.” You need to know how to facilitate communication properly both online and off for the tools to be effective. Plenty of companies are fine without them, and although more should be utilizing them, they don’t solve everything. Improvements in communication and customer service will have to come from multiple angles, both internal and external like you mention.
@Matches I agree, “social media” as we know it right now is evolving drastically and will continue to. The tools may stay the same, improve, or change all together. The practices behind it as well might.
@Amber I like how you say nothing involving specific tools. Because in the end they are just “tools.” You need to know how to facilitate communication properly both online and off for the tools to be effective. Plenty of companies are fine without them, and although more should be utilizing them, they don’t solve everything. Improvements in communication and customer service will have to come from multiple angles, both internal and external like you mention.
I’m a big fan of communication theory from all facets and I’m glad you emphasized that the tools are only means to end (or ongoing) results. I agree with Matches in that I think too many people only think about the tools, whether they be Twitter, Facebook, RSS, etc. when they think “social media,” and that’s only part of the picture. What we need to do is stress more on their applications to whatever it is we want to do, and also outline pros/cons of each, user demographics (though I’m noticing a lot more lately, see Shannon Paul’s recent post), and most importantly, continue to study past strategies in various case studies to learn best practices, what not to do, what worked well for one but not the other, yada yada yada … to develop our own “blueprints” in the future. I’m not a fan of “cookie cutter” anything but I am a fan of learning from others to make our own cookies.
My deepest interest is actually how we can use our new tools on old communication theories and how they can be integrated into college curricula. My worry is that existing professors know only as much (or maybe less) than their students in this realm, and such a quickly-changing social media “world” may be hard to integrate. This stuff is too important to ignore, though.
Stacy Lukass last blog post..People like this guy need to be called out.
I’m a big fan of communication theory from all facets and I’m glad you emphasized that the tools are only means to end (or ongoing) results. I agree with Matches in that I think too many people only think about the tools, whether they be Twitter, Facebook, RSS, etc. when they think “social media,” and that’s only part of the picture. What we need to do is stress more on their applications to whatever it is we want to do, and also outline pros/cons of each, user demographics (though I’m noticing a lot more lately, see Shannon Paul’s recent post), and most importantly, continue to study past strategies in various case studies to learn best practices, what not to do, what worked well for one but not the other, yada yada yada … to develop our own “blueprints” in the future. I’m not a fan of “cookie cutter” anything but I am a fan of learning from others to make our own cookies.
My deepest interest is actually how we can use our new tools on old communication theories and how they can be integrated into college curricula. My worry is that existing professors know only as much (or maybe less) than their students in this realm, and such a quickly-changing social media “world” may be hard to integrate. This stuff is too important to ignore, though.
Stacy Lukass last blog post..People like this guy need to be called out.
Amber, Good Morning
I have a different story, in that, when applying Social Media to business it IS about the Tools, assuming you understand the basics of Social Media. My simplistic vision and experience of Social Media applied to business marketing is it is an “Opportunity to participate in the conversation with your customer”.
The tools, or differently said the median in which our CUSTOMER chooses to communicate are the tools that are appropriately applied. Point here is, we don’t get to choose which tools, the customer does. We need to match the tools to where the customer chooses to participate.
In our small business we are applying strategies that worked years ago, to this new thing called Social Media with compelling results. But,………, one venue or tool doesn’t fit all. Some of our customers communicate best on MySpace, some on facebook, some on Twitter, some on our Ning site, the point is, you need to get out there in the various places, and Listen for Your Customer. They may allow you to participate in a conversation on one site but not the other.
Eric Browns last blog post..Are you keeping tabs on brand experience?
Amber, Good Morning
I have a different story, in that, when applying Social Media to business it IS about the Tools, assuming you understand the basics of Social Media. My simplistic vision and experience of Social Media applied to business marketing is it is an “Opportunity to participate in the conversation with your customer”.
The tools, or differently said the median in which our CUSTOMER chooses to communicate are the tools that are appropriately applied. Point here is, we don’t get to choose which tools, the customer does. We need to match the tools to where the customer chooses to participate.
In our small business we are applying strategies that worked years ago, to this new thing called Social Media with compelling results. But,………, one venue or tool doesn’t fit all. Some of our customers communicate best on MySpace, some on facebook, some on Twitter, some on our Ning site, the point is, you need to get out there in the various places, and Listen for Your Customer. They may allow you to participate in a conversation on one site but not the other.
Eric Browns last blog post..Are you keeping tabs on brand experience?
Thank you for the thought provoking post Amber. As the Director of Marketing/Communications for a ski resort I am always looking for the right ways to communicate with my targeted audiences whether they be our internal team, guests, community or media. As Stacy mentioned above, it’s about trying to figure out where my demographic is and then what messages I want to communicate to them. I am looking for ways where I can create dialogue and engagement to these audiences. Some tools work for one and not the other and some tools don’t work at all. It’s about being willing to change and not just focusing on the term I love “ROI.” Brand advocates is something you can’t put a price on.
Krista Parrys last blog post..Why I Waited to Ski Until Today
Thank you for the thought provoking post Amber. As the Director of Marketing/Communications for a ski resort I am always looking for the right ways to communicate with my targeted audiences whether they be our internal team, guests, community or media. As Stacy mentioned above, it’s about trying to figure out where my demographic is and then what messages I want to communicate to them. I am looking for ways where I can create dialogue and engagement to these audiences. Some tools work for one and not the other and some tools don’t work at all. It’s about being willing to change and not just focusing on the term I love “ROI.” Brand advocates is something you can’t put a price on.
Krista Parrys last blog post..Why I Waited to Ski Until Today
What do people need when talking theory and practice? That is a good question Amber. Here are my 2 bits.
Any theory, scientific or otherwise, does have some sort of ultimate intent of applicability. I agree. And I’m seeing a lot of wishy washy talk about web 2.0 and I think it’s adding to confusion for non-geeks as to what the heck the geeky/techy types are so excited about.
I applaud you trying to get greesy and bridge some gaps. The more I get to know you, the more of an incredible bridge builder you seem.
So…I think right now the theories need proper clarification. i.e. Glossaries and nice colourful and clear diagrams for exactly what the heck is being talked about. Social media for dummies/text book style.
Remember what the great physicist Richard Feynman said (paraphrasing): If you can’t teach it to a 5 year old, you don’t really know what the heck you are talking about.
Otherwise, real world peeps are not going to get it. They might jump on the bandwagon b/c they are told to jump on, but do we want sheep or educated useage of this media?
Also:
1. Why is it important? Why should I (as newbie or skeptic) care?
2. Who is it for and how?
3. How it it really making life any better? Is it just a cool new toy, or is it really adding something of efficiency to what we already do or an actual new item of value?
4. Clarification of online vs. offline worlds — delineate the geography. Some things online just seem to be online and real world support that online world (like SIMS). Whereas other online things support the real world.
These are at least some things that I would like to see…
All the best, Maria
Maria Laviss last blog post..Lessons in Love
What do people need when talking theory and practice? That is a good question Amber. Here are my 2 bits.
Any theory, scientific or otherwise, does have some sort of ultimate intent of applicability. I agree. And I’m seeing a lot of wishy washy talk about web 2.0 and I think it’s adding to confusion for non-geeks as to what the heck the geeky/techy types are so excited about.
I applaud you trying to get greesy and bridge some gaps. The more I get to know you, the more of an incredible bridge builder you seem.
So…I think right now the theories need proper clarification. i.e. Glossaries and nice colourful and clear diagrams for exactly what the heck is being talked about. Social media for dummies/text book style.
Remember what the great physicist Richard Feynman said (paraphrasing): If you can’t teach it to a 5 year old, you don’t really know what the heck you are talking about.
Otherwise, real world peeps are not going to get it. They might jump on the bandwagon b/c they are told to jump on, but do we want sheep or educated useage of this media?
Also:
1. Why is it important? Why should I (as newbie or skeptic) care?
2. Who is it for and how?
3. How it it really making life any better? Is it just a cool new toy, or is it really adding something of efficiency to what we already do or an actual new item of value?
4. Clarification of online vs. offline worlds — delineate the geography. Some things online just seem to be online and real world support that online world (like SIMS). Whereas other online things support the real world.
These are at least some things that I would like to see…
All the best, Maria
Maria Laviss last blog post..Lessons in Love
Amber –
Two things immediately come to mind.
As the tools and use of those tools increase dramatically, we are going to be more in need of elegant organization and easy contextualization. I think it is going to take quite a marriage between social media tools and semantic web tools to make that happen.
As we try to transform a traditional media company into a C3 – Complete Community Connection, your statement rings very true:
The foundation of external social media success is internal. It’s having the right mindset, the right team in place, the right resources allocated (and waiting in the wings) so that social media becomes part of the culture and operation of a business from the inside out. It just doesn’t work otherwise.
Chuck Peterss last blog post..Relationship = Attention x Trust
Amber –
Two things immediately come to mind.
As the tools and use of those tools increase dramatically, we are going to be more in need of elegant organization and easy contextualization. I think it is going to take quite a marriage between social media tools and semantic web tools to make that happen.
As we try to transform a traditional media company into a C3 – Complete Community Connection, your statement rings very true:
The foundation of external social media success is internal. It’s having the right mindset, the right team in place, the right resources allocated (and waiting in the wings) so that social media becomes part of the culture and operation of a business from the inside out. It just doesn’t work otherwise.
Chuck Peterss last blog post..Relationship = Attention x Trust
Hi Amber,
Some interesting thoughts on this one. This is one of the big challenges of the day, bridging the business as usual approach with new media. New media takes a different type of personality and charisma and many employees & employers have difficulty making this switch.
My thought is that social media and business will do the dance for the next year or two and there will eventually be a recognition that the investment and training are worth the effort.
New media like Linkedin and Twitter are excellent for authors or individual entrepreneurs since they are easy to adapt to change, but corporations will take some time.
Kevin
Kevin Boons last blog post..I’m Now on Soundclick & Twitter
Hi Amber,
Some interesting thoughts on this one. This is one of the big challenges of the day, bridging the business as usual approach with new media. New media takes a different type of personality and charisma and many employees & employers have difficulty making this switch.
My thought is that social media and business will do the dance for the next year or two and there will eventually be a recognition that the investment and training are worth the effort.
New media like Linkedin and Twitter are excellent for authors or individual entrepreneurs since they are easy to adapt to change, but corporations will take some time.
Kevin
Kevin Boons last blog post..I’m Now on Soundclick & Twitter
I like that you’re taking us back to theory. In my small PR business I work with marine companies who have limited budgets and who are used to very traditional ways of marketing and advertising. I think it’s extremely helpful to talk about why to bridge the gap between the online and offline worlds and then talk about how to do that with all the available tools.
Natalie Fritons last blog post..Print vs. Digital: An Ongoing Debate
I like that you’re taking us back to theory. In my small PR business I work with marine companies who have limited budgets and who are used to very traditional ways of marketing and advertising. I think it’s extremely helpful to talk about why to bridge the gap between the online and offline worlds and then talk about how to do that with all the available tools.
Natalie Fritons last blog post..Print vs. Digital: An Ongoing Debate
Three simple things that need to be firmly in place in order to find any treasure in Online Internet Marketing.
You have to know where to look for it…
You have to know what to look for…
You need the right tools to bring it to surface.
Regards,
treasurehuntreview.co.cc
Three simple things that need to be firmly in place in order to find any treasure in Online Internet Marketing.
You have to know where to look for it…
You have to know what to look for…
You need the right tools to bring it to surface.
Regards,
treasurehuntreview.co.cc