A comment by Jen on my post about using Twitter DMs for business asked a specific question:
How do you know when to take a conversation into more private channel, versus continuing it out in the open?
In other words, you have a disgruntled customer on Twitter. Do you respond via @ reply or DM? You’ve got a negative post on your FB fan page. Do you respond there, or try to contact that person through Facebook mail instead? When do you address an emerging issue or question directly in a blog comment versus requesting a conversation in a different medium, like a phone call?
Something important to note: if the initial comment is made publicly, I always make sure there is *some* kind of public acknowledgment, even if it’s to indicate that I’ll be contacting them through other means, or providing my contact information. It demonstrates that you’re paying attention – both to the individual and the rest of the community (who may very well be watching how you respond).
But I have a few rules of thumb I follow for situations that might require a more closed conversation, and I’ll share them below. Would love you to give us your take, too.
“Boiling Point” Comments
Never throw gasoline on a fire online. Just don’t do it. Flame wars are far too easy to fan, especially in truncated social network conversations. If a customer or prospect is really angry, inflammatory, or derogatory, it’s always best to try and acknowledge the conversation publicly so they know they’ve been heard, but take the discussion elsewhere.
It’s much easier to calmly gather details and really get to the root of an issue in a quieter, more individualized venue. Plus, it communicates that the problem is important enough to you to address directly and personally.
Specific Account Issues
If you’re dealing with an issue that requires the exchange of any identifying account information or details of your work with a client, customer, or prospect, it belongs in a private communication. It might be okay to swap email addresses more publicly (using the [at] or [dot] conventions to try and minimize the scraping potential), but anything like phone numbers or account information should be taken out of the public stream. When in doubt, better to err on the side of private.
Proprietary/Confidential Business Discussion
This is probably the most obvious. If you need to discuss confidential business information – including trade secrets or competitive advantages – take the conversation off the public stream. That may include resolving troubleshooting or technical issues, too. Likewise for financial information that’s not public, discussions of personnel or human resource issues, or anything that your boss, client, or colleague wouldn’t be really happy to find in the public domain.
Need for Additional Details or People
If your conversation is specific to your one-to-one business relationship, and if it takes more than a couple of messages back and forth to resolve, it probably belongs in another channel. Your entire Twitter audience doesn’t need (or likely want) to see you hammer out your mutual calendars for a conference call. If you’re trying to resolve a business question, interview opportunity, or a customer service inquiry, you might also need to ask more in-depth questions or loop in other people on your team. All of that is probably better suited to a more closed network of communication.
Personal Conversation or Gossip
If you’re catching up with a friend or even a client or colleague about the family vacation or the details of last night’s date, a few pings back and forth might be okay. But depending on your audience and the nature of the network you’re using, the more extensive personal conversations might be better served in a one-to-one channel like IM or email. Regarding how and what you say to and about other people and businesses? The only answer here is to use your judgment. But in all cases, remember that words are awfully hard to retract.
So what else would you add? Are there other types of discussions that you think are better suited to private channels? What’s been your experience about what works well in public, and what works better in private? I’m sure there are more than I’ve thought of. Let’s chat?
* (aside: I hate the term “offline” to say “we’ll take this into a separate conversation”. That’s only a true statement if you’re moving from an online channel to an offline one. Taking something from a meeting to another meeting, or from phone to a meeting, or from a phone call to email is NOT taking it “offline”. There I said it. Carry on.)
image by tiffa130
Great points Amber.
I see many people make the mistake of trying to defend themselves in these sitations and end up looking worse in the process. The same thing holds true when using email. If your message could be mis-interpreted, then it is more effective to have a face-to-face conversation or at the very least, telephone call.
Keep up the great posts!
Kelley
http://www.FearlessSellingBlog.com
I agree. Sometimes people “assume” you are taking on maybe a nonchalant or upset tone, because they are forming an opinion in their head from what they read. With sensitive matters it is best to converse by phone or face-to-face like you said. That way both parties can actually hear the tone of the conversation, and reduce the risk of giving off negativity accidentally.
With conversations face-to-face or over the phone you can hear how one another sounds, happy, sad, angry, ok, excited, and so on.
.-= Shala´s last blog .."The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a…" =-.
Great points Amber.
I see many people make the mistake of trying to defend themselves in these sitations and end up looking worse in the process. The same thing holds true when using email. If your message could be mis-interpreted, then it is more effective to have a face-to-face conversation or at the very least, telephone call.
Keep up the great posts!
Kelley
http://www.FearlessSellingBlog.com
I agree. Sometimes people “assume” you are taking on maybe a nonchalant or upset tone, because they are forming an opinion in their head from what they read. With sensitive matters it is best to converse by phone or face-to-face like you said. That way both parties can actually hear the tone of the conversation, and reduce the risk of giving off negativity accidentally.
With conversations face-to-face or over the phone you can hear how one another sounds, happy, sad, angry, ok, excited, and so on.
.-= Shala´s last blog .."The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a…" =-.
This should all already be obvious to everyone, but our social media timelines so often show they aren’t. You’ve pretty much covered all the axioms of both personal and professional communication on-line and off-line here.
Re Boiling point: Our tone is always very important in any conversation and can often be misconstrued when read instead of heard. That tone is almost impossible to present in 140 characters, comments, IMs et al. I find e-mail or an actual phone/Skype conversation is best for settling any issues, misunderstandings or other potentially combustible situations, personal or business.
Thanks for taking the time to write this. Will be passing it on and often.
I really like SKYPE it comes in handy with trying to meet up with people who have conflicting schedules. It allows you to have that one-on-one conversation with facial expressions and audible tones without having to meet at a physical place. Plus, most times the people I talk to are constantly at the computer and it works better for us to have the conversation on the computer while we continue working on the computer. Lastly, it is definitely awesome for working with people located in different states, and it is free, lol.
.-= Shala´s last blog .."The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a…" =-.
This should all already be obvious to everyone, but our social media timelines so often show they aren’t. You’ve pretty much covered all the axioms of both personal and professional communication on-line and off-line here.
Re Boiling point: Our tone is always very important in any conversation and can often be misconstrued when read instead of heard. That tone is almost impossible to present in 140 characters, comments, IMs et al. I find e-mail or an actual phone/Skype conversation is best for settling any issues, misunderstandings or other potentially combustible situations, personal or business.
Thanks for taking the time to write this. Will be passing it on and often.
I really like SKYPE it comes in handy with trying to meet up with people who have conflicting schedules. It allows you to have that one-on-one conversation with facial expressions and audible tones without having to meet at a physical place. Plus, most times the people I talk to are constantly at the computer and it works better for us to have the conversation on the computer while we continue working on the computer. Lastly, it is definitely awesome for working with people located in different states, and it is free, lol.
.-= Shala´s last blog .."The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a…" =-.
Thanks for this, Kelley. It’s also helpful to consider the motivation before communicating. If you don’t really know, it’s probably not that important. More important is that our digital comms will outlive us. What do we want to leave behind?
Amber, I am completely with you on the “offline” comment. Meeting to meeting does not an offline conversation make.
The best public questions can be answered with yes, no or a link. Beyond that, it’s typically better to provide someone with your email address, if just to avoid long winded blog comments or 140+ character DMs. The major exception I’ve seen (and several companies do this very well), is to relate a problem one customer is having to one that many others may have as well. By taking a wide view of the issue, you may answer more than one question at the same time.
Amber, I am completely with you on the “offline” comment. Meeting to meeting does not an offline conversation make.
The best public questions can be answered with yes, no or a link. Beyond that, it’s typically better to provide someone with your email address, if just to avoid long winded blog comments or 140+ character DMs. The major exception I’ve seen (and several companies do this very well), is to relate a problem one customer is having to one that many others may have as well. By taking a wide view of the issue, you may answer more than one question at the same time.
Yup. On like all fronts.
We CONSUMERS have grown way too accustomed to instantaneous flame-throwing. As BRANDS, best thing we can do in all the instances above is (1) acknowledge receipt and (2) move the convo to a private forum.
Oh and picking up the Gosh Darn Phone won’t hurt us brands, too.
As always, thanks for stimulating conversation.
.-= Dave Van de Walle´s last blog ..Why Turning Down PR is GOOD for Business =-.
Yup. On like all fronts.
We CONSUMERS have grown way too accustomed to instantaneous flame-throwing. As BRANDS, best thing we can do in all the instances above is (1) acknowledge receipt and (2) move the convo to a private forum.
Oh and picking up the Gosh Darn Phone won’t hurt us brands, too.
As always, thanks for stimulating conversation.
.-= Dave Van de Walle´s last blog ..Why Turning Down PR is GOOD for Business =-.
Nice clear and concise wrap-up on the various options people should consider when communicating in public vs private.
Not surprisingly, we still see too many public conversations that ought to be private. Too many users, not enough common sense and understanding how permanent our digital footprints become.
And as you stated, fighting in a public forums is never a good idea. There are no winners no matter what the outcome. Always take the high road and in the long run you’ll be better off. That’s the approach I live by anyway.
.-= David Benjamin´s last blog ..Gaining an Edge vs. Your Competition =-.
Nice clear and concise wrap-up on the various options people should consider when communicating in public vs private.
Not surprisingly, we still see too many public conversations that ought to be private. Too many users, not enough common sense and understanding how permanent our digital footprints become.
And as you stated, fighting in a public forums is never a good idea. There are no winners no matter what the outcome. Always take the high road and in the long run you’ll be better off. That’s the approach I live by anyway.
.-= David Benjamin´s last blog ..Gaining an Edge vs. Your Competition =-.
These are great recommendations, especially the one about acknowledging a disgruntled customer publicly before solving the problem privately. I also think that if a customer concern is a FAQ, it would be best to post the response and public, thank them for asking, and then integrate the issue into its official FAQs.
These are great recommendations, especially the one about acknowledging a disgruntled customer publicly before solving the problem privately. I also think that if a customer concern is a FAQ, it would be best to post the response and public, thank them for asking, and then integrate the issue into its official FAQs.
I regularly have received commendation emails after a public conflict (or an attempt at one!) – and that encourages me to keep public responses positive and affirming, with a promise to send a private message to follow up so the regular chat can go on. My donors seem to be ‘watching’ me, which is both creepy and affirming. lol.
I see too many companies who let a negative comment slide down the page, and I always wonder – how many people un-subscribe or lose interest when they see comments getting ignored. They may not like the original snarky poster, but people really do watch the voice of a company or org and make their judgments accordingly.
Thanks for your great articles.
I regularly have received commendation emails after a public conflict (or an attempt at one!) – and that encourages me to keep public responses positive and affirming, with a promise to send a private message to follow up so the regular chat can go on. My donors seem to be ‘watching’ me, which is both creepy and affirming. lol.
I see too many companies who let a negative comment slide down the page, and I always wonder – how many people un-subscribe or lose interest when they see comments getting ignored. They may not like the original snarky poster, but people really do watch the voice of a company or org and make their judgments accordingly.
Thanks for your great articles.
I work for a nonprofit organization and we make it a policy to always respond to any comment that was made publicly ( on our FB page or Twitter) in an appropriate public way. If it is something that would have the tendency to continue on in a negative manner then sometimes I will add onto the end of my response “If you would like more information about _____ you can email me at ______” or “If you would like to speak with our ______ about this issue you can email him at ____” to give the commenter the hint that we are happy to continue the discussion but it is best taken off of the social sphere if possible. I try to never end the conversation without presenting the commenter with an option to keep it going, if they feel the need, but perhaps in a more appropriate manner.
I’m sure it is similar with any for-profit, but especially with a non-profit you lose your donors trust if you do not respond equally in-depth and quickly to both negatives and positives.
I work for a nonprofit organization and we make it a policy to always respond to any comment that was made publicly ( on our FB page or Twitter) in an appropriate public way. If it is something that would have the tendency to continue on in a negative manner then sometimes I will add onto the end of my response “If you would like more information about _____ you can email me at ______” or “If you would like to speak with our ______ about this issue you can email him at ____” to give the commenter the hint that we are happy to continue the discussion but it is best taken off of the social sphere if possible. I try to never end the conversation without presenting the commenter with an option to keep it going, if they feel the need, but perhaps in a more appropriate manner.
I’m sure it is similar with any for-profit, but especially with a non-profit you lose your donors trust if you do not respond equally in-depth and quickly to both negatives and positives.
**disclaimer: apparently I decided to use Amber’s blog to make a post of my own! I really had no idea my soapbox comment would be this long.
Great post Amber! Thank you for sharing from your vantage point. I’m happy to know that I’ve been thinking/acting this same way.
My ‘start’ in the online web/social media was in 1999 when I started a Yahoo Group for my company. We had thousands of consultants who were based all over the US and these “Groups” proved to be the lifeline for our company–even back then, we couldn’t afford NOT to engage in social media.
In addition to the great points you’ve already listed, I found the following CRM practices to be invaluable:
Re: “Boiling Point” Comments – (When a customer feels they have been wronged)
1. Never, ever get defensive when replying to a negative post or comment. Stay cool and humble. When in doubt, take more of the blame than necessary. Everyone makes mistakes and for the most part, consumers are very understanding. It’s when brands deny wrongdoing or continually make the same mistakes over and over that the customer gets fed up and disgruntled.
2. Validate their concerns or issue. And as much as we want to be snide or prideful, its important to not come across as condescending.
3. Make a point to not only rectify the situation, but make it up to the customer by giving them the experience they should have received initially and then some. This can be something as small as a $5-10 gift card (who doesn’t love them some Amazon.com?), the gesture itself will create a brand ambassador who’s worth is tenfold. If you have to justify the spend, consider it a marketing expense.
When this can be done immediately and digitally, all the better. You’ll find what was once a negative situation, quickly turn into a public love-fest between the brand rep and customer–right within the very space that started out distressed (did I really just type love-fest?).
Although most of this process happens privately, you’ve publicly validated their issue and everyone knows you’re taking care of it offline. 95% of the time the consumer will immediately post again to the original space and tell everyone how amazing your brand is. #customerforlife
.-= Jen Grant´s last blog ..cr8tivejen: Reading NOW 🙂 #crazyday RT @AmberCadabra Thx to @cr8tivejen for inspiring today’s post: When to Take it Private http://bit.ly/cFnrAU =-.
**disclaimer: apparently I decided to use Amber’s blog to make a post of my own! I really had no idea my soapbox comment would be this long.
Great post Amber! Thank you for sharing from your vantage point. I’m happy to know that I’ve been thinking/acting this same way.
My ‘start’ in the online web/social media was in 1999 when I started a Yahoo Group for my company. We had thousands of consultants who were based all over the US and these “Groups” proved to be the lifeline for our company–even back then, we couldn’t afford NOT to engage in social media.
In addition to the great points you’ve already listed, I found the following CRM practices to be invaluable:
Re: “Boiling Point” Comments – (When a customer feels they have been wronged)
1. Never, ever get defensive when replying to a negative post or comment. Stay cool and humble. When in doubt, take more of the blame than necessary. Everyone makes mistakes and for the most part, consumers are very understanding. It’s when brands deny wrongdoing or continually make the same mistakes over and over that the customer gets fed up and disgruntled.
2. Validate their concerns or issue. And as much as we want to be snide or prideful, its important to not come across as condescending.
3. Make a point to not only rectify the situation, but make it up to the customer by giving them the experience they should have received initially and then some. This can be something as small as a $5-10 gift card (who doesn’t love them some Amazon.com?), the gesture itself will create a brand ambassador who’s worth is tenfold. If you have to justify the spend, consider it a marketing expense.
When this can be done immediately and digitally, all the better. You’ll find what was once a negative situation, quickly turn into a public love-fest between the brand rep and customer–right within the very space that started out distressed (did I really just type love-fest?).
Although most of this process happens privately, you’ve publicly validated their issue and everyone knows you’re taking care of it offline. 95% of the time the consumer will immediately post again to the original space and tell everyone how amazing your brand is. #customerforlife
.-= Jen Grant´s last blog ..cr8tivejen: Reading NOW 🙂 #crazyday RT @AmberCadabra Thx to @cr8tivejen for inspiring today’s post: When to Take it Private http://bit.ly/cFnrAU =-.
Your approach to “boiling point” comments is great. I think people tend to shy away from these kinds of comments. Ignoring the comment or even deleting it can even add to the fire. I agree with you and I think there should be some kind of response. Who knows maybe you can receive some beneficial feedback.
Your approach to “boiling point” comments is great. I think people tend to shy away from these kinds of comments. Ignoring the comment or even deleting it can even add to the fire. I agree with you and I think there should be some kind of response. Who knows maybe you can receive some beneficial feedback.
I do have conversations with people on Twitter and I do know it is permanent but they do eventually get moved to a DM or an email if I feel it should be. I tend to talk a lot back and forth and I am okay with it. I probably should move it to DM sooner then I do though. I don’t know I am on the fence with this.
.-= Jamie Favreau´s last blog ..Social Media to Save the NHL (Last installment a bit late) =-.
I do have conversations with people on Twitter and I do know it is permanent but they do eventually get moved to a DM or an email if I feel it should be. I tend to talk a lot back and forth and I am okay with it. I probably should move it to DM sooner then I do though. I don’t know I am on the fence with this.
.-= Jamie Favreau´s last blog ..Social Media to Save the NHL (Last installment a bit late) =-.
I feel it is important to realize and decide on the best channel to carry on certain conversations like you say, because your followers are watching you like you mentioned. You could inadvertently hurt or increase the loyalty in your followers by what you say publicly.
.-= Shala´s last blog .."The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a…" =-.
I feel it is important to realize and decide on the best channel to carry on certain conversations like you say, because your followers are watching you like you mentioned. You could inadvertently hurt or increase the loyalty in your followers by what you say publicly.
.-= Shala´s last blog .."The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a…" =-.
Great points! As someone who manages various social media networks on behalf of the country, I’m very careful about the conversations I have publicly. But I totally agree with you in that there should be some sort of public acknowledgement to a customer service issue; I always do this.
Thanks for the post!
.-= Ashley K. Edwards´s last blog ..FTC Regulations and Me =-.
Great points! As someone who manages various social media networks on behalf of the country, I’m very careful about the conversations I have publicly. But I totally agree with you in that there should be some sort of public acknowledgement to a customer service issue; I always do this.
Thanks for the post!
.-= Ashley K. Edwards´s last blog ..FTC Regulations and Me =-.